Literature DB >> 16034225

A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices.

Jennifer L Johansson1, Delsey M Sherrill, Patrick O Riley, Paolo Bonato, Hugh Herr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although variable-damping knee prostheses offer some improvements over mechanically passive prostheses to transfemoral amputees, there is insufficient evidence that such prostheses provide advantages at self-selected walking speeds. In this investigation, we address this question by comparing two variable-damping knees, the hydraulic-based Otto Bock C-leg and the magnetorheological-based Ossur Rheo, with the mechanically passive, hydraulic-based Mauch SNS.
DESIGN: For each prosthesis, metabolic data were collected on eight unilateral amputees walking at self-selected speeds across an indoor track. Furthermore, kinetic, kinematic, and electromyographic data were collected while walking at self-selected speeds across a 10-m walkway in a laboratory.
RESULTS: When using the Rheo, metabolic rate decreases by 5% compared with the Mauch and by 3% compared with the C-leg. Furthermore, for the C-leg and Rheo knee devices, we observe biomechanical advantages over the mechanically passive Mauch. These advantages include an enhanced smoothness of gait, a decrease in hip work production, a lower peak hip flexion moment at terminal stance, and a reduction in peak hip power generation at toe-off.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that variable-damping knee prostheses offer advantages over mechanically passive designs for unilateral transfemoral amputees walking at self-selected ambulatory speeds, and the results further suggest that a magnetorheological-based system may have advantages over hydraulic-based designs.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034225     DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000174665.74933.0b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  29 in total

1.  Design of a Semi-Powered Stance-Control Swing-Assist Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Authors:  J T Lee; H L Bartlett; M Goldfarb
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.303

2.  Performance Evaluation of Jaipur Knee Joint through Kinematics and Kinetics Gait Symmetry with Unilateral Transfemoral Indian Amputees.

Authors:  Pawan Mishra; Sachin Singh; Vinayak Ranjan; Sonu Singh; Ankit Vidyarthi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Towards Biomimetic Virtual Constraint Control of a Powered Prosthetic Leg.

Authors:  Robert D Gregg; Jonathon W Sensinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.485

4.  Virtual Constraint Control of a Powered Prosthetic Leg: From Simulation to Experiments with Transfemoral Amputees.

Authors:  Robert D Gregg; Tommaso Lenzi; Levi J Hargrove; Jonathon W Sensinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Robot       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.567

5.  Intuitive Clinician Control Interface for a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Study.

Authors:  David Quintero; Emma Reznick; Daniel J Lambert; Siavash Rezazadeh; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.316

6.  Gait asymmetry of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.

Authors:  Kenton R Kaufman; Serena Frittoli; Carlo A Frigo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.

Authors:  Kenton R Kaufman; James A Levine; Robert H Brey; Shelly K McCrady; Denny J Padgett; Michael J Joyner
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography.

Authors:  He Huang; Todd A Kuiken; Robert D Lipschutz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Powered knee and ankle prosthesis with indirect volitional swing control enables level-ground walking and crossing over obstacles.

Authors:  Joel Mendez; Sarah Hood; Andy Gunnel; Tommaso Lenzi
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2020-07-22

10.  Development of a biomechanical energy harvester.

Authors:  Qingguo Li; Veronica Naing; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.