| Literature DB >> 30546915 |
Woineshet Asrat1, Teferi Mekonnen2, Melkamu Bedimo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ethiopia is a Sub Saharan African country with an estimated contraceptive prevalence rate of 36% and 22% unmet need for family planning service among married women. Client satisfaction influences the use of Family Planning and other reproductive health services. There is limited information on satisfaction with family planning service among Family planning users particularly in the northern part of Ethiopia. Hence, this study aimed to provide information on client satisfaction and its determinant among women in Public Health facilities of Northwestern Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Bahir Dar Ethiopia; Client satisfaction; Family planning; Public health facility
Year: 2018 PMID: 30546915 PMCID: PMC6282313 DOI: 10.1186/s40834-018-0079-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contracept Reprod Med ISSN: 2055-7426
Socio-Demographic characteristics of Family planning user’s at the public health facility in Bahir Dar city administration, from March 1,2017, to 30, 2017(n = 490)
| Variable | Category | Number | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years | 15–19 | 37 | 7.6 |
| 20–24 | 110 | 22.4 | |
| 25–29 | 177 | 36.1 | |
| 30–34 | 110 | 22.4 | |
| 35 & above | 56 | 11.4 | |
| Residence | Rural | 109 | 22.2 |
| Urban | 381 | 77.8 | |
| Educational status | Unable to read and write | 117 | 23.9 |
| Read and write only | 90 | 18.4 | |
| Grade 1 to 8 | 58 | 11.8 | |
| Grade 9 to 12 | 117 | 23.2 | |
| Certificate and above | 108 | 22.7 | |
| Occupational Status | Government employee | 96 | 19.6 |
| Private employee | 58 | 11.8 | |
| Merchant | 67 | 13.7 | |
| Housewife | 164 | 33.5 | |
| Unemployed | 17 | 3.5 | |
| Student | 23 | 4.7 | |
| Daily laborer | 65 | 13.3 | |
| Religion | Orthodox Christian | 394 | 80.4 |
| Muslim | 68 | 13.9 | |
| Other | 28 | 5.7 | |
| Marital status | Married | 407 | 83.1 |
| Single | 62 | 12.7 | |
| Divorced | 17 | 3.5 | |
| Widowed | 4 | 0.8 |
Family planning service utilization, health facility related characteristics’ among family planning user’s at public health facility in Bahir Dar city administration, from March 1,2017 to March 30, 2017(n = 490)
| Variable | Category | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of Health facility visited | Health Center | 389 | 79.4 |
| Hospital | 101 | 20.6 | |
| Frequency of visit | New | 122 | 24.9 |
| Repeat | 368 | 75.1 | |
| Number of children | Have no child | 122 | 24.9 |
| 1–4 children | 343 | 70.0 | |
| > 4 children | 25 | 5.1 | |
| Clients receiving their method of choice | Yes | 334 | 68.2 |
| No | 156 | 31.8 | |
| Method that the client was using | Pills | 32 | 6.5 |
| Inject able | 303 | 61.8 | |
| Implant | 126 | 25.7 | |
| IUCD | 29 | 5.9 | |
| Time it takes to reach the health facility for FP service | Less than half hour | 314 | 64.1 |
| Half hour to 1 h | 134 | 27.3 | |
| 1 to 2 h | 24 | 4.9 | |
| More than 2 h | 18 | 3.7 | |
| Waiting time to received the service | Less than half hour | 226 | 46.1 |
| Half hour to 1 h | 210 | 42.9 | |
| 1 to 2 h | 33 | 6.7 | |
| More than 2 h | 21 | 4.3 | |
| Perceived waiting time for the FP service | Short waiting time | 302 | 61.6 |
| Long waiting time | 61 | 38.4 | |
| FP service hour convenient for you | Convenient | 407 | 83.1% |
| Inconvenient | 83 | 16.9% |
Fig. 1Client-provider interaction and information given by family planning service provider characteristics of family planning user’s at public health facility in Bahir Dar city administration, from March 1 to 30, 2017(n=490)
Proportion of client Satisfaction among family planning users at public health facility at public health facility in Bahir Dar city, from March, 2017(n = 490)
| Characteristics | Very dissatisfied [No (%)] | Dissatisfied [No(%)] | Neutral [No(%)] | Satisfied [No. (%)] | Very satisfied [No. (%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration staff warmly welcomed you | 31(6.3) | 126(25.7) | 152(31.0) | 128(26.1) | 53(10.8) |
| Professionals* informed you where FP service department | 10(2.0) | 102(20.8) | 171(34.9) | 152(31.0) | 55(11.2) |
| Professionals* were available when required | 10(2.0) | 39(8.0) | 126(25.7) | 241(49.2) | 74(15.1) |
| Professionals* introduce their name to you | 181(36.9) | 182(37.1) | 57(11.6) | 52(10.6) | 18(3.7) |
| Professionals* spent enough time in consultation | 19(3.9) | 44(9.0) | 177(36.1) | 203(41.4) | 47(9.6) |
| Professionals* were respectful | 9(1.8) | 67(13.7) | 192(39.2) | 166(33.9) | 56(11.4) |
| Professionals* performs the procedure with cleanliness and sanitation | 5(1.0) | 4(0.8) | 50(10.2) | 287(58.6) | 144(29.4) |
| Professionals* explanation was clear and straightforward | 3(0.6) | 11(2.2) | 51(10.4) | 266(54.3) | 159(32.4) |
| Choice of methods available | 14(2.9) | 6(1.2) | 32(6.5) | 219(44.7) | 219(44.7) |
| Professionals* gave adequate information | 16(3.3) | 43(8.8) | 123(25.1) | 206(42.0) | 102(20.8) |
| Health facility easily accessible | 13(2.7) | 23(4.7) | 119(24.3) | 237(48.4) | 98(20.0) |
| Location of family planning service department | 7(1.4) | 37(7.6) | 160(32.7) | 198(40.4) | 88(18.0) |
| Waiting room has enough sitting chairs | 33(6.7) | 27(5.5) | 115(23.5) | 180(36.7) | 135(27.6) |
| Cleanliness of the health facility | 5(1.0) | 18(3.7) | 128(26.1) | 228(46.5) | 111(22.7) |
* Professionals* in this table indicated that those who provide family planning service in Public Health facilities of Bahir Dar city administration
Factors associated with client satisfaction with family planning service among respondents at public health facilities in Bahir Dar city administration, North West Ethiopia, March, 2017 (n = 490)
| Variables | Family planning Service User | COR(95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfied (%) | Not satisfied (%) | |||||
| Marital status | Married | 275(67.6%) | 132(32.4%) | 1.4(0.9, 2.3)* | 1.76(0.9,3.3) | 0.080 |
| Others | 49(59%) | 34(41%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Occupational status | Government employee | 46(47.9%) | 50(52.1%) | 1 | 1 | 0.007 |
| Private employee | 29(50.0%) | 29(50.0%) | 1.1(0.7,2.1) | 1.2(0.6,2.5) | ||
| Merchant | 48(71.6%) | 19(28.4%) | 2.7(1.4,5.3)** | 2.5(1.2, 5.2)** | ||
| Housewife | 21(73.8%) | 43(26.2%) | 3.1(1.8,5.2)** | 2.4(1.3, 4.4)*** | ||
| Unemployed | 13(76.5%) | 4(23.5%) | 3.5(1.1,11.6)** | 3.3(0.8,12.8) | ||
| Student | 15(65.2%) | 8(34.8%) | 2.0(0.8,5.3 | 1.9(0.7, 5.8) | ||
| Daily laborer | 52(80.0%) | 13(20.0%) | 4.3(2.1, 9.0) | 3.9(1.8,8.6)*** | ||
| FP visit | New | 88(72.1%) | 34(27.9%) | 1.2(0.9, 2.3)* | 2.3(1.3,4.0)*** | 0.004 |
| Repeat | 236(64.1%) | 132(35.9%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Service hour convenience | No | 35(42.2%) | 48(57.8%) | 1 | 1 | 0.002 |
| Yes | 289(71.0%) | 18(29.0%) | 3.4(2.1,5.5) | 2.4(1.4, 4.3)*** | ||
| Waiting time | < 1/2 h | 166(73.5%) | 60(26.5%) | 6.9(2.6,18.7)** | 9.7(3.2, 29.3)*** | .001 |
| ≥1/2to 1 h | 132(62.9%) | 78(37.1%) | 4.23(1.6,11.2) | 6.4(2.1, 19.2)*** | ||
| > 1 to 2 h | 20(60.6%) | 13(39.4%) | 3.85(1.2,12.5) | 4.6(1.3, 16.7)** | ||
| > 2 h | 6(28.6%) | 5(71.4%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Privacy | No | 33(39.3%) | 51(60.7%) | 1 | 1 | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 291(71.7%) | 115(28.3%) | 3.9(2.4,6.37)*** | 3.2(1.8, 5.5)*** | ||
NB: *P-Value < 0.2, **P-Value < 0.05, ***p-value < 0.01