| Literature DB >> 32801953 |
Daniel Wogu1, Tsegaye Lolaso1, Mengistu Meskele1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Client satisfaction influences the use of family planning and other reproductive health services. This study aimed to assess the magnitude of client satisfaction with family service and its associated factors among reproductive-age women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a facility-based cross-sectional study. A total of 411 clients, nested in four health facilities, were included in the analysis. Systematic sampling was employed to select study units for the exit interview. Data collection instruments for this study were pre-tested structured questionnaires. Client satisfaction was assessed using fifteen Likert-scaled question items. Each item of question has 5 points ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and, finally, mean was computed. The pre-coded data were entered into Epi Data version 4.2.0 and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independently associated factors at a confidence interval of 95% and a significance level of p-value less than 0.05.Entities:
Keywords: Southern Ethiopia; client satisfaction; family planning service
Year: 2020 PMID: 32801953 PMCID: PMC7394595 DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S258831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access J Contracept ISSN: 1179-1527
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Respondents, Tembaro, September 2019
| Background Characteristics | Frequency | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 15–24 | 119 | 29.2 |
| 25–34 | 232 | 57 | |
| 35–44 | 56 | 13.8 | |
| Residence | Rural | 250 | 61.4 |
| Urban | 157 | 38.6 | |
| Marital status | Single | 28 | 6.9 |
| Married | 368 | 90.4 | |
| Divorced | 10 | 2.5 | |
| Widowed | 1 | 0.2 | |
| No formal education | 82 | 20.1 | |
| Educational level | Primary | 128 | 39.4 |
| Secondary | 103 | 31.7 | |
| College and above | 94 | 28.9 | |
| Religion | Protestant | 182 | 44.7 |
| Orthodox | 119 | 29.2 | |
| Catholic | 63 | 15.5 | |
| Muslim | 42 | 10.3 | |
| Ethnicity | Tembaro | 288 | 71 |
| Hadiya | 53 | 13 | |
| Kembata | 36 | 9 | |
| Dawuro | 14 | 3 | |
| Wolaita | 8 | 2 | |
| Other | 8 | 2 | |
| Occupation | Housewife | 123 | 30 |
| Merchant | 26 | 6 | |
| Government employee | 107 | 27 | |
| No occupation | 19 | 5 | |
| Student | 117 | 29 | |
| Others | 14 | 3 | |
| Frequency of visit | New | 84 | 21 |
| Repeat | 323 | 79 | |
Clients Responses with Aspects of FP Services Organization in Government Health Facilities in Tembaro, September 2019
| Clients Response | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Opening time convenience | ||
| Yes | 352 | 86.5 |
| No | 55 | 13.5 |
| Working hour convenience | ||
| Yes | 362 | 89 |
| No | 45 | 11 |
| Privacy ensured during the procedure | ||
| Yes | 211 | 51.8 |
| No | 196 | 48.2 |
| Comfortable with the cleanliness of the clinic | ||
| Yes | 113 | 27.8 |
| No | 294 | 72.2 |
| Clinical staff showed respect | ||
| Yes | 317 | 77.9 |
| No | 90 | 22.1 |
| Waiting room has a poster on family planning | ||
| Yes | 158 | 38.8 |
| No | 249 | 61.2 |
| Client waiting time | ||
| Less than 30 minutes | 131 | 32 |
| 30 minutes up to an hour | 135 | 33 |
| Greater than one hour | 141 | 35 |
| Follow up card filled with date of appointment was given | ||
| Yes | 354 | 87 |
| No | 53 | 13 |
Perceived Technical Competence of Family Planning Providers, Tembaro. September 2019
| Technical Competence | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Provider explained how the method work | ||
| Yes | 291 | 71.5 |
| No | 116 | 28.5 |
| Demonstrate how to use the method | ||
| Yes | 285 | 70 |
| No | 122 | 30 |
| Describe possible side effects | ||
| Yes | 246 | 60.4 |
| No | 161 | 39.6 |
| Describe what to do when a problem occurs | ||
| Yes | 281 | 70.8 |
| No | 119 | 29.2 |
| Describe the possibility of changing method if not happy | ||
| Yes | 322 | 79.1 |
| No | 85 | 20.9 |
| Describe follow-up visit | ||
| Yes | 358 | 88 |
| No | 49 | 12 |
| Information regarding complication | ||
| Yes | 243 | 59.7 |
| No | 164 | 40.3 |
Factors Associated with Client Satisfaction on Family Planning Services. Tembaro, 2019
| Variable | Category | Satisfaction | UOR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfied | Not-Satisfied | ||||
| Residence | Rural | 108 | 142 | 0.75(0.50–1.12) | 3.07(1.10–8.62)* |
| Urban | 79 | 78 | 1 | 1 | |
| Age | 18–24 | 56 | 63 | 0.66(0.35–1.26) | 0.77(0.16–3.78) |
| 25–34 | 99 | 133 | 0.55(0.31–1.00) | 0.68(0.16–2.90) | |
| 35+ | 32 | 24 | 1 | 1 | |
| Educational level | Primary | 52 | 42 | 1 | 1 |
| Secondary | 39 | 64 | 0.83(0.48–1.42) | 0.41(0.13–1.35) | |
| College and above | 65 | 63 | 0.49(0.27–0.87) | 0.22(0.07–0.70)* | |
| Waiting time | <30 minutes | 114 | 17 | 32.7(16.7–64) | 7.80(2.48–24.48)** |
| 30 minute-1 hr | 49 | 86 | 2.77(1.58–4.87) | 2.57(0.92–7.15) | |
| >1 hr | 24 | 117 | 1 | 1 | |
| FP room localized in bold letters | Yes | 95 | 45 | 4.01(2.59–6.20) | 2.31(0.88–6.10) |
| No | 92 | 175 | 1 | 1 | |
| Privacy ensured during the procedure | Yes | 161 | 50 | 21(12.5–35.4) | 7.16(2.89–17.69)** |
| No | 26 | 170 | 1 | 1 | |
| Room have posters with key messages on FP | Yes | 131 | 27 | 16.7(10–27.8) | 9.00(3.27–24.75)** |
| No | 56 | 193 | 1 | 1 | |
| History of side-effect of the method | Yes | 93 | 152 | 0.43(0.29–0.65) | 0.39(0.14–1.09) |
| No | 94 | 67 | 1 | 1 | |
| Blood pressure measured during the visit | Yes | 110 | 22 | 12.8(7.58–21.8) | 2.89(0.83–10.07) |
| No | 77 | 198 | 1 | 1 | |
| Weight measured during the visit | Yes | 129 | 55 | 6.67(4.31–10.3) | 1.87(0.62–5.66) |
| No | 58 | 165 | 1 | 1 | |
| Discussed about the method with her husband | Yes | 148 | 146 | 1.92(1.22–3.01) | 0.43(0.14–1.30) |
| No | 39 | 74 | 1 | 1 | |
| Described how method work | Yes | 153 | 138 | 2.67(1.68–4.24) | 0.85(0.29–2.26) |
| No | 34 | 82 | 1 | 1 | |
| Demonstrate how to use the method | Yes | 143 | 142 | 1.78(1.15–2.76) | 0.96(0.34–2.66) |
| No | 44 | 78 | 1 | 1 | |
| Get description about the side-effect | Yes | 146 | 100 | 4.27(2.76–6.61) | 3.14(1.02–9.76)* |
| No | 41 | 120 | 1 | 1 | |
| Appointed to come before the next visit if complication occurs | Yes | 160 | 128 | 4.26(2.61–6.93) | 2.26(0.59–8.66) |
| No | 27 | 92 | 1 | 1 | |
Notes: *Significant p-value <0.05, **Significant p-value <0.0001.