Literature DB >> 30545909

High-capacity preconscious processing in concurrent groupings of colored dots.

Peng Sun1, Charles Chubb2, Charles E Wright2, George Sperling1.   

Abstract

Grouping is a perceptual process in which a subset of stimulus components (a group) is selected for a subsequent-typically implicit-perceptual computation. Grouping is a critical precursor to segmenting objects from the background and ultimately to object recognition. Here, we study grouping by color. We present subjects with 300-ms exposures of 12 dots colored with the same but unknown identical color interspersed among 14 dots of seven different colors. To indicate grouping, subjects point-click the remembered centroid ("center of gravity") of the set of homogeneous dots, of heterogeneous dots, or of all dots. Subjects accurately judge all of these centroids. Furthermore, after a single stimulus exposure, subjects can judge both the heterogeneous and homogeneous centroids, that is, subjects simultaneously group by similarity and by dissimilarity. The centroid paradigm reveals the relative weight of each dot among targets and distractors to the underlying grouping process, offering a more detailed, quantitative description of grouping than was previously possible. A change detection experiment reveals that conscious memory contains less than two dots and their locations, whereas an ideal detector would have to perfectly process at least 15 of 26 dots to match the subjects' centroid judgments-indicating an extraordinary capacity for preconscious grouping. A different color set yielded identical results. Grouping theories that rely on predefined feature maps would fail to explain these results. Rather, the results indicate that preconscious grouping is automatic, flexible, and rapid, and a far more complex process than previously believed.

Keywords:  centroid judgments; grouping by similarity; perceptual grouping; preconscious processing; summary statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30545909      PMCID: PMC6310816          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1814657115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: a probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns.

Authors:  Michael Kubovy; Martin van den Berg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Grouping principles in direct competition.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Grouping by proximity or similarity? Competition between the Gestalt principles in vision.

Authors:  P T Quinlan; R N Wilton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.

Authors:  Johan Wagemans; James H Elder; Michael Kubovy; Stephen E Palmer; Mary A Peterson; Manish Singh; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Perceptual grouping across eccentricity.

Authors:  Teresa Tannazzo; Daniel D Kurylo; Farhan Bukhari
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A neural theory of attentive visual search: interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations.

Authors:  S Grossberg; E Mingolla; W D Ross
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Common-fate grouping as feature selection.

Authors:  Brian R Levinthal; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-08-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  A direct comparison of central tendency recall and temporal integration in the successive field iconic memory task.

Authors:  Jacob Zepp; Chad Dubé; David Melcher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.