Literature DB >> 9797920

Grouping by proximity or similarity? Competition between the Gestalt principles in vision.

P T Quinlan1, R N Wilton.   

Abstract

The nature of the psychological processes that underlie the Gestalt principles of grouping by proximity and grouping by similarity is examined. Similarity was defined relative to the principles of grouping by common colour and grouping by common shape. Subjects were presented with displays comprising a row of seven coloured shapes and were asked to rate the degree to which the central target shape grouped with either the right or the left flanking shapes. Across the displays the proximal and featural relationships between the target and flankers were varied. These ratings reflected persuasive effects of grouping by proximity and common colour; there was only weak evidence for grouping by common shape. Nevertheless, both common colour and common shape were shown to override grouping by proximity, under certain conditions. The data also show that to understand how the Gestalt principles operate it appears necessary to consider processes that operate within and between groups of elements that are initially identified on the basis of proximity. Whether such groups survive further analysis depends critically on the featural content of the constituent elements.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797920     DOI: 10.1068/p270417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Julie J Neiworth; Amy J Gleichman; Anne S Olinick; Kristen E Lamp
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  High-capacity preconscious processing in concurrent groupings of colored dots.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Charles Chubb; Charles E Wright; George Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Common region wins the competition between extrinsic grouping cues: Evidence from a task without explicit attention to grouping.

Authors:  Pedro R Montoro; Cristina Villalba-García; Dolores Luna; José A Hinojosa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

4.  Interaction dynamics between grouping principles in touch: phenomenological and psychophysical evidence.

Authors:  Antonio Prieto; Julia Mayas; Soledad Ballesteros
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-24

Review 5.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.

Authors:  Johan Wagemans; James H Elder; Michael Kubovy; Stephen E Palmer; Mary A Peterson; Manish Singh; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Depth from blur and grouping under inattention.

Authors:  Einat Rashal; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory.

Authors:  Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  Evidence for the beneficial effect of perceptual grouping on visual working memory: an empirical study on illusory contour and a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Jiaofeng Li; Jiehui Qian; Fan Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  In Vision It Is Groups, Rather Than Maps, That Determine How We Perceive the World.

Authors:  Philip T Quinlan; Keith Allen; Dale J Cohen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19

10.  Extrinsic grouping factors in motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Dina Devyatko; Alexander Pastukhov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.