| Literature DB >> 30545025 |
Agnieszka U Blachnio-Zabielska1,2, Hady Razak Hady3, Adam R Markowski4, Adam Kurianiuk5, Alicja Karwowska6, Jan Górski7,8, Piotr Zabielski9,10.
Abstract
Ceramide accumulation in muscle and in liver is implicated in the induction of insulin resistance. Much less in known about the role of ceramide in adipose tissue. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of ceramide in adipose tissue and to clarify whether lipids participate in the regulation of adipocytokine secretion. The experiments were performed on male Wistar rats divided into three groups: 1. Control, 2. fed high fat diet (HFD), and 3. fed HFD and treated with myriocin. Ceramide (Cer) and diacylglycerol (DAG) content were analyzed by LC/MS/MS. Hormone sensitive lipase (HSL) phosphorylation was analyzed by Western Blot. Plasma adiponectin and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) concentration were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT) was also performed. In HFD group, total DAG and Cer content was elevated in both subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, which was accompanied by increased glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR value. Myriocin treatment restored HOMA-IR as well as glucose and insulin concentration to control values. Moreover, myriocin decreased not only Cer, but also DAG levels in both fat depots. Furthermore, we observed a strong correlation between adiponectin (negative) and TNF-α (positive) and Cer in both fat tissues, which suggests that Cer is involved in the regulation of adipocytokine secretion.Entities:
Keywords: ceramide; insulin resistance; mass spectrometry; metabolic disorders; subcutaneous adipose tissue; visceral adipose tissue
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30545025 PMCID: PMC6321500 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19123995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Metabolic parameters in rats with HFD-induced insulin resistance and under myriocin (Myr) treatment.
| Metabolic Parameter | Control | HFD | HFD/Myr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting plasma glucose concentration [mg/dL] | 97.8 ± 14.3 | 139.2 ± 27.1 a | 86.6 ± 19.9 * |
| Fasting insulin concentration [µU/mL] | 51.7 ± 12.9 | 65.9 ± 9.6 | 55.8 ± 10.0 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.08 ± 0.6 | 3.75 ± 0.84 a | 1.96 ± 0.52 * |
| Plasma FFA concentration [µmol/L] | 279.1 ± 34.7 | 362.2 ± 24.4 a | 403.3 ± 49.3 * |
| Plasma adiponectin concentration [µg/mL] | 18.9 ± 2.8 | 10.8 ± 1.6 a | 22.9 ± 3.1 * |
| Plasma TNF-α concentration [ng/mL] | 1.52 ± 0.19 | 2.57 ± 0.4 a | 1.41 ± 0.40 * |
a—vs. Control; *—vs. HFD.
Figure 1Myriocin treatment improved glucose and insulin tolerance in animals on a high-fat diet. Panel (A) shows blood glucose profiles obtained during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); Panel (B) shows blood glucose profiles during intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test. Values are mean +/− SD. Symbols denote statistical significance of p < 0.05 against: a—vs. control group; *—vs. HFD group.
Plasma FFA concentration in rats with HFD-induced insulin resistance and under myriocin (Myr) treatment. Values are mean (µmol/L of plasma) +/− SD.
| Fatty Acid | Control | HFD | HFD/Myr |
|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 | 13.2 ± 2.6 | 14.8 ± 2.6 | 15.7 ± 0.7 |
| C16:1 | 7.3 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 0.3 a | 2.5 ± 0.4 a |
| C18:2 | 64.9 ± 12.8 | 59.9 ± 3.2 | 102.8 ± 13.9 |
| C16:0 | 61.2 ± 8.7 | 60.7 ± 4.8 | 83.4 ± 13.5 * |
| C18:1 | 66.2 ± 14.2 | 45.6 ± 8.7 a | 68.7 ± 11.6 * |
| C18:0 | 36.6 ± 4.1 | 91.4 ± 10.5 a | 94.1 ± 15.3 * |
| C20:0 | 1.02 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.9 a | 3.1 ± 0.3 a,* |
| C22:0 | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 11.7 ± 0.9 a | 15.0 ± 2.4 a |
| C24:1 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 0.4 a,* |
| C24:0 | 22.5 ± 3.0 | 69.4 ± 15.6 a | 6.8 ± 0.4 * |
a—vs. Control; *—vs. HFD.
Figure 2A ratio of pHSL (Ser563) to HSL in two depots of adipose tissue. White bars—control group; grey bars—HFD group; black bars—HFD/Met group. Values are mean +/− SD. Symbols denote statistical significance of p < 0.05 versus: a—vs. Control group; *—vs. HFD group.
Figure 3Panel (A) presents total ceramide content in two depots of adipose tissue. Panel (B) shows total DAG content in two depots of adipose tissue. White bars—control group; grey bars—HFD group; black bars—HFD/Myr group. Values are mean +/− SD. Symbols denote statistical significance of p < 0.05 versus: a—vs. control group; *—vs. HFD group.
Ceramide in two depots of adipose tissue. Values are mean (pmol/mg tissue) +/− SD.
| Visceral Fat Tissue | Subcutaneous Fat Tissue | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceramide | Control | HFD | HFD/Myr | Control | HFD | HFD/Myr |
| C14-Cer | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.014 ± 0.003 a | 0.003 ± 0.0005 a,* | 0.03 ± 0.006 | 0.04 ± 0.006 a | 0.01 ± 0.000 a,* |
| C16-Cer | 1.05 ± 0.19 | 1.82 ± 0.30 a | 1.36 ± 0.27 a,* | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 4.1 ± 0.6 a | 1.68 ± 0.37 a,* |
| C18:1-Cer | 0.008 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.006 a | 0.01 ± 0.002 a,* | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02 a | 0.03 ± 0.003 * |
| C18-Cer | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.10 a | 0.20 ± 0.04 a,* | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 1.22 ± 0.18 a | 0.43 ± 0.06 a,* |
| C20-Cer | 0.09 ± 0.018 | 0.34 ± 0.09 a | 0.09 ± 0.01 a,* | 0.37 ± 0.10 | 0.58 ± 0.05 a | 0.15 ± 0.02 a,* |
| C22-Cer | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.09 a | 0.22 ± 0.03 a,* | 0.65 ± 0.10 | 1.32 ± 0.3 a | 0.41 ± 0.06 a,* |
| C24:1-Cer | 0.53 ± 0.11 | 0.63 ± 0.09 a | 0.38 ± 0.06 a,* | 0.91 ± 0.16 | 1.27 ± 0.3 a | 0.74 ± 0.08 a,* |
| C24-Cer | 2.02 ± 0.39 | 2.9 ± 0.34 a | 0.56 ± 0.09 a,* | 1.72 ± 0.23 | 4.04 ± 0.64 a | 1.05 ± 0.15 a,* |
| Total Cer | 4.35 ± 0.61 | 6.94 ± 0.85 a | 2.84 ± 0.35 a,* | 6.83 ± 0.80 | 12.71 ± 1.0 a | 4.50 ± 0.52 a,* |
a—vs. Control; *—vs. HFD.
DAG in two depots of adipose tissue. Values are mean (pmol/mg tissue) +/− SD.
| Visceral Fat Tissue | Subcutaneous Fat Tissue | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diacylglycerol | Control | HFD | HFD/Myr | Control | HFD | HFD/Myr |
| 16/16 | 0.41 ± 0.07 | 1.09 ± 0.18 | 0.6 ± 0.06 * | 1.07 ± 0.27 | 3.45 ± 0.64 | 3.07 ± 0.43 * |
| 16/18:1 | 1.8 ± 0.23 | 7.1 ± 1.0 | 5.3 ± 0.67 a,* | 5.20 ± 0.78 | 19.4 ± 3.2 a | 11.0 ± 0.7 a,* |
| 16/18:2 | 1.08 ± 0.19 | 3.09 ± 0.45 a | 2.13 ± 0.22 * | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 6.33 ± 0.97 a | 4.05 ± 0.33 a,* |
| 16/18 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 1.09 ± 0.18 a | 0.55 ± 0.08 * | 0.93 ± 0.11 | 3.1 ± 0.68 a | 2.14 ± 0.16 a,* |
| 18:1/18:1 | 1.14 ± 0.25 | 6.0 ± 1.02 a | 3.19 ± 0.43 * | 3.39 ± 0.39 | 10.9 ± 1.3 a | 6.08 ± 0.30 * |
| 18:1/18:2 | 1.1 ± 0.20 | 5.32 ± 0.85 a | 2.52 ± 0.27 * | 2.18 ± 0.63 | 14.9 ± 2.1 a | 6.92 ± 0.44 a,* |
| 18/18:1 | 0.01 ± 0.004 | 0.05 ± 0.008 a | 0.027 ± 0.005 a,* | 0.08 ± 0.008 | 0.35 ± 0.049 a | 0.12 ± 0.02 a,* |
| Total DAG | 5.84 ± 0.47 | 23.73 ± 1.35 a | 14.32 ± 1.1 a,* | 14.88 ± 1.31 | 58.57 ± 4.28 a | 33.46 ± 1.46 a,* |
a— vs. Control; *— vs. HFD.
Figure 4Panel (A) shows the correlation between ceramide content in visceral tissue and plasma adiponectin concentration. Panel (B) shows the correlation between ceramide content in visceral tissue and plasma TNF-α concentration. Panel (C) shows the correlation between ceramide content in visceral tissue and HOMA-IR value.
Figure 5Panel (A) shows the correlation between ceramide content in subcutaneous fat tissue and plasma adiponectin concentration. Panel (B) shows the correlation between ceramide content in subcutaneous fat tissue and plasma TNF-α concentration. Panel (C) shows the correlation between ceramide content in subcutaneous fat and HOMA-IR value.