| Literature DB >> 32325909 |
Adam R Markowski1, Agnieszka U Błachnio-Zabielska2, Katarzyna Guzińska-Ustymowicz3, Agnieszka Markowska4, Karolina Pogodzińska2, Kamila Roszczyc5, Justyna Zińczuk6, Piotr Zabielski5.
Abstract
Much attention is paid to different sphingolipid pathways because of their possible use in diagnostics and treat<span class="Species">ment. However, the activity status and significance of ceramide pathways in colorectal cancer are still unclear. We analyzed colorectal cancer patients to evaluate sphingolipid profiles in the blood, colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues, and healthy surrounding colorectal tissues of the same patient, simultaneously, using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Furthermore, we measured protein expression of de novo ceramide synthesis enzymes and mitochondrial markers in tissues using western blot. We confirmed the different sphingolipid contents in colorectal cancer tissue compared to healthy surrounding tissues. Furthermore, we showed changed amounts of several ceramides in more advanced colorectal cancer tissue and found a prominently higher circulating level of several of them. Moreover, we observed a relationship between the amounts of some ceramide species in colorectal cancer tissue and plasma depending on the stage of colorectal cancer according to TNM (tumors, nodes, metastasis) classification. We think that the combined measurement of several ceramide concentrations in plasma can help distinguish early-stage lesions from advanced colorectal cancer and can help produce a screening test to detect early colorectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: advanced stage; ceramides profile; colorectal cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32325909 PMCID: PMC7225954 DOI: 10.3390/biom10040632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Demographics and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
| Characteristics | No. of Patients |
|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis [y] | |
| <60 | 9 |
| 60–69 | 19 |
| 70–79 | 9 |
| 80v90 | 8 |
| Sex | |
| Males | 33 |
| Females | 12 |
| Tumor localization | |
| Sigmoid colon | 10 |
| Rectum | 14 |
| Cecum | 6 |
| Other parts of colon | 15 |
| Tumor size [mm] | |
| <30 | 12 |
| 31–60 | 20 |
| 61–90 | 11 |
| >90 | 2 |
| Tumor grading | |
| G1 | 2 |
| G2 | 37 |
| G3 | 6 |
| Tumor staging | |
| TNM I | 14 |
| TNM II | 10 |
| TNM III | 15 |
| TNM IV | 6 |
Content of sphingolipids in normal colorectal tissue and colorectal cancer tissue. Statistical significance is marked with an asterisk.
| Compound | Normal Tissue [pmol/mg] | Tumor [pmol/mg] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SE | Min–Max | M ± SE | Min–Max | |
| Sph | 2.37 ± 0.19 | 0.35–5.79 | 6.38 ± 0.67 * | 0.57–18.64 |
| S1P | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.00–0.08 | 0.05 ± 0.01 * | 0.01–0.17 |
| SPA | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.10–3.10 | 1.48 ± 0.15 * | 0.27–4.15 |
| C14:0-Cer | 1.15 ± 0.09 | 0.14–2.75 | 1.60 ± 0.11 * | 0.28–2.99 |
| C16:0-Cer | 104.05 ± 7.42 | 7.57–195.65 | 120.81 ± 8.79 | 18.24–248.21 |
| C18:1-Cer | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.04–0.66 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.09–0.74 |
| C18:0-Cer | 4.07 ± 0.27 | 0.39–8.97 | 3.09 ± 0.19 * | 1.07–5.50 |
| C20:0-Cer | 1.33 ± 0.09 | 0.51–2.38 | 0.88 ± 0.07 * | 0.32–1.92 |
| C22:0-Cer | 3.17 ± 0.15 | 1.27–4.75 | 3.08 ± 0.20 | 1.16–5.43 |
| C24:1-Cer | 14.06 ± 0.79 | 4.66–25.86 | 14.00 ± 0.84 | 6.51–26.12 |
| C24:0-Cer | 4.77 ± 0.25 | 1.21–8.09 | 6.55 ± 0.47 * | 1.27–14.16 |
| Totoal Cer | 132.90 ± 8.42 | 18.01–231.51 | 150.34 ± 9.72 | 34.14–286.37 |
Values are mean [pmol/mg] ± standard error of mean [M ± SEM]; * p < 0.05 vs. normal tissue.
Figure 1Protein expression of de novo ceramide synthesis enzymes (A)–(C) and mitochondrial marker (D) in normal colorectal tissue and colorectal cancer tissue. The values represent the mean protein expression +/- SEM, normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) housekeeping protein expression; * p < 0.05 vs. tumor tissue (n = 11), as estimated by paired t-test. (A) CerS1–ceramide synthase 1; (B) CerS5–ceramide synthase 5; (C) SPTLC2–serine palmitoyltransferase catalytical subunit 2; (D) COX IV–cytochrome C oxidase, subunit IV; GADPH–glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Pictures below graphs show representative blots from sample pools and were not used for calculation.
Content of sphingolipids in colorectal cancer tissue of patients divided into groups depending on the 8th edition of the TNM classification.
| Tumor | TNM I | TNM II | TNM III | TNM IV | TNM I+II | TNM III+IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sph | 7.17 ± 1.34 | 6.69 ± 1.11 | 5.23 ± 1.05 | 4.25 ± 0.79 | 6.93 ± 0.85 | 4.92 ± 0.75 |
| S1P | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| SPA | 1.56 ± 0.37 | 1.45 ± 0.23 | 1.40 ± 0.27 | 1.21 ± 0.25 | 1.51 ± 0.21 | 1.34 ± 0.20 |
| C14:0 | 1.71 ± 0.16 | 1.51 ± 0.22 | 1.55 ± 0.26 | 1.72 ± 0.34 | 1.61 ± 0.13 | 1.61 ± 0.20 |
| C16:0 | 128.98 ± 16.15 | 111.58 ± 17.73 | 126.78 ± 19.28 | 108.44 ± 19.33 | 120.28 ± 11.84 | 121.05 ± 14.37 |
| C18:1 | 0.37 ± 0.06 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.03 |
| C18:0 | 2.87 ± 0.35 | 2.70 ± 0.31 | 3.61 ± 0.34 | 3.32 ± 0.70 | 2.79 ± 0.23 | 3.52 ± 0.31 |
| C20:0 | 0.73 ± 0.13 | 0.82 ± 0.14 | 1.02 ± 0.11 | 1.04 ± 0.14 | 0.78 ± 0.09 | 1.03 ± 0.09 * |
| C22:0 | 2.90 ± 0.44 | 2.75 ± 0.34 | 3.36 ± 0.35 | 3.62 ± 0.56 | 2.83 ± 0.27 | 3.44 ± 0.29 |
| C24:1 | 12.66 ± 1.64 | 14.28 ± 2.07 | 14.96 ± 1.29 | 15.16 ± 1.76 | 13.47 ± 1.30 | 15.02 ± 1.01 * |
| C24:0 | 6.89 ± 1.02 | 6.08 ± 0.82 | 6.86 ± 1.04 | 6.27 ± 0.89 | 6.48 ± 0.64 | 6.67 ± 0.75 |
| Total Cer | 157.12 ± 17.27 | 140.00 ± 20.12 | 158.44 ± 21.08 | 139.85 ± 23.32 | 148.56 ± 13.05 | 152.63 ± 15.94 |
Values are mean [pmol/mg] ± standard error of mean [M ± SEM]; * p < 0.05 vs. TNM I+II and TNM III+IV.
Concentration of sphingolipids in the plasma of colorectal cancer patients divided into groups depending on the 8th edition of the TNM classification.
| Plasma | TNM I | TNM II | TNM III | TNM IV | TNM I+II | TNM III+IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sph | 11.49 ± 1.22 | 12.51 ± 1.88 | 12.66 ± 1.14 | 14.43 ± 2.83 | 11.95 ± 1.06 | 13.05 ± 1.06 |
| S1P | 332.31 ± 22.30 | 365.10 ± 38.57 | 390.59 ± 31.41 | 399.46 ± 83.57 | 347.07 ± 20.97 | 392.56 ± 29.35 |
| SPA | 4.53 ± 0.34 | 5.09 ± 0.60 | 5.18 ± 0.49 | 4.73 ± 0.48 | 4.78 ± 0.33 | 5.08 ± 0.39 |
| C14:0 | 12.24 ± 1.12 | 11.60 ± 1.05 | 12.86 ± 1.22 | 12.17 ± 0.25 | 11.95 ± 0.76 | 12.71 ± 0.94 |
| C16:0 | 398.56 ± 45.61 | 407.09 ± 36.14 | 527.46 ± 49.80 | 503.25 ± 75.97 | 402.40 ± 29.17 | 522.08 ± 41.32 * |
| C18:1 | 5.61 ± 0.28 | 5.91 ± 0.43 | 7.48 ± 0.98 | 7.32 ± 1.10 | 5.74 ± 0.24 | 7.44 ± 0.79 * |
| C18:0 | 47.02 ± 7.21 | 45.06 ± 4.09 | 57.15 ± 5.84 | 59.39 ± 15.94 | 46.14 ± 4.27 | 57.65 ± 5.50 |
| C20:0 | 47.26 ± 4.99 | 44.25 ± 3.42 | 56.54 ± 3.48 | 56.12 ± 14.70 | 45.91 ± 3.09 | 56.45 ± 3.96 * |
| C22:0 | 700.69 ± 81.36 | 694.71 ± 95.31 | 777.00 ± 75.71 | 656.47 ± 38.92 | 698.00 ± 60.31 | 750.22 ± 60.14 |
| C24:1 | 1259.4 ± 92.4 | 1429.5 ± 165.5 | 1644.1 ± 164.3 | 1484.2 ± 153.7 | 1335.9 ± 89.6 | 1608.6 ± 131.3 * |
| C24:0 | 2465.7 ± 226.2 | 2369.7 ± 308.7 | 2634.5 ± 274.7 | 2272.9 ± 258.5 | 2422.5 ± 181.6 | 2554.1 ± 220.9 |
| Total Cer | 4936.5 ± 410.5 | 5007.8 ± 569.3 | 5717.1 ± 519.1 | 5051.9 ± 172.9 | 4968.6 ± 332.1 | 5569.2 ± 407.4 |
Values are mean [pmol/mL] ± standard error of mean [M ± SEM]; * p < 0.05 vs. TNM I+II and TNM III+IV.
Figure 2Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of statistically significant plasma sphingolipids (C16:0-Cer, C-24:1-Cer, C18:1-Cer, and C20:0-Cer) in patients with advanced CRC (TNM III+IV).