| Literature DB >> 30544567 |
Shotaro Hoi1, Tomoaki Takata2, Takaaki Sugihara3, Ayami Ida4, Masaya Ogawa5, Yukari Mae6, Satoko Fukuda7, Chishio Munemura8, Hajime Isomoto9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Kidney size is associated with renal function, however it is not elucidated whether kidney size is a risk for the progression of chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of morphological evaluation of kidney size by ultrasonography for the progression of renal dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: CKD risk factors; cortex; kidney function; kidney size; ultrasonography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30544567 PMCID: PMC6306756 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7120527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Study design. Of the 137 patients who underwent abdominal ultrasonography, 87 were included in the analysis.
Figure 2Longitudinal image of ultrasonography for the measurement. C, cortical thickness; M, medullary thickness; L, length.
Patient's characteristics at baseline.
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Number | 87 |
| Age, years | 67.0 (28–95) |
| Male | 44 (50.6) |
| Height, cm | 159.0 (140–182) |
| Body weight, kg | 55.7 (36.8–92.0) |
| Body surface area, m2 | 1.43 (1.21–2.12) |
| Serum creatinine, mg/dL | 0.76 (0.35–4.72) |
| Estimated GFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 67.0 (10.2–137.7) |
| Kidney parameters | |
| Length, mm/cm | 60.9 (49.9–73.7) |
| Volume, ×1000 mm3/cm | 69.7 (39.6–129.3) |
| Cortical thickness, mm/cm | 4.4 (3.0–6.9) |
| Medullary thickness, mm/cm | 5.4 (3.5–8.8) |
Kidney parameters were indexed to height, and average of the two kidneys is shown. Data are presented as the median (range), or n (%). GFR, glomerular filtration rate.
Kidney morphological parameters with reference to body size.
| Parameters | Reference | Average Values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | M/F Ratio | ||
| Length, mm | None | 100.4 | 94.4 | 1.063 |
| Height, cm | 60.1 | 62.1 | 0.968 | |
| BSA, m2 | 58.2 | 62.1 | 0.937 | |
| Volume, ×1000 mm3 | None | 138.0 | 97.6 | 1.414 |
| Height, cm | 82.7 | 63.9 | 1.295 | |
| BSA, m2 | 79.5 | 67.1 | 1.185 | |
| Cortical thickness, mm | None | 7.7 | 6.9 | 1.123 |
| Height, cm | 4.6 | 4.5 | 1.028 | |
| BSA, m2 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 0.936 | |
| Medullary thickness, mm | None | 9.1 | 8.4 | 1.072 |
| Height, cm | 5.4 | 5.5 | 0.982 | |
| BSA, m2 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 0.899 | |
BSA, body surface area.
Association between baseline eGFR and morphological parameters.
| Variables |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 0.439 | <0.001 |
| Volume | 0.236 | 0.034 |
| Cortical thickness | 0.253 | 0.019 |
| Medullary thickness | 0.166 | 0.128 |
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Figure 3Correlation of morphological parameters by ultrasonography and decline in renal function over 2 years. Scatter plots comparing the decline in eGFR and baseline eGFR (a), kidney length (b), volume (c), cortical thickness (d) and medullary thickness (e). eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Multiple linear regression analysis: association between decline in kidney function and morphological parameters.
| Variable | Std β | |
|---|---|---|
| Cortical thickness | 0.458 | <0.001 |
| Length | −0.208 | 0.058 |
| eGFR | 0.001 | 0.990 |
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Figure 4The ROC curve of baseline eGFR (a) and height-adjusted cortical thickness (b) for predicting renal dysfunction. The height-adjusted cortical thickness of 4.0 mm/cm was determined to be a diagnostic cut off value with a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 80.0%. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.