Bekir Tanriover1, Sonalis Fernandez, Eric S Campenot, Jeffrey H Newhouse, Irina Oyfe, Prince Mohan, Burhaneddin Sandikci, Jai Radhakrishnan, Jennifer J Wexler, Maureen A Carroll, Sairah Sharif, David J Cohen, Lloyd E Ratner, Mark A Hardy. 1. 1 Division of Nephrology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 2 Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY. 3 Department of Pathology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY. 4 Department of Radiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY. 5 Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 6 Renal Transplantation, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 7 Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relationship between live donor renal anatomic asymmetry and posttransplant recipient function has not been studied extensively. METHODS: We analyzed 96 live kidney donors, who had anatomical asymmetry (>10% renal length and/or volume difference calculated from computerized tomography angiograms) and their matching recipients. Split function differences (SFD) were quantified with technetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid renography. Implantation biopsies at time 0 were semiquantitatively scored. A comprehensive model using donor renal volume adjusted to recipient weight (Vol/Wgt), SFD, and biopsy score was used to predict recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year. Primary analysis consisted of a logistic regression model of outcome (odds of developing eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year), a linear regression model of outcome (predicting recipient eGFR at one-year, using the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration formula), and a Monte Carlo simulation based on the linear regression model (N=10,000 iterations). RESULTS: In the study cohort, the mean Vol/Wgt and eGFR at 1 year were 2.04 mL/kg and 60.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Volume and split ratios between 2 donor kidneys were strongly correlated (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). The biopsy scores among SFD categories (<5%, 5%-10%, >10%) were not different (P = 0.190). On multivariate models, only Vol/Wgt was significantly associated with higher odds of having eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m (odds ratio, 8.94, 95% CI 2.47-32.25, P = 0.001) and had a strong discriminatory power in predicting the risk of eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year [receiver operating curve (ROC curve), 0.78, 95% CI, 0.68-0.89]. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of donor renal anatomic asymmetry, Vol/Wgt appears to be a major determinant of recipient renal function at 1 year after transplantation. Renography can be replaced with CT volume calculation in estimating split renal function.
BACKGROUND: Relationship between live donor renal anatomic asymmetry and posttransplant recipient function has not been studied extensively. METHODS: We analyzed 96 live kidney donors, who had anatomical asymmetry (>10% renal length and/or volume difference calculated from computerized tomography angiograms) and their matching recipients. Split function differences (SFD) were quantified with technetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid renography. Implantation biopsies at time 0 were semiquantitatively scored. A comprehensive model using donor renal volume adjusted to recipient weight (Vol/Wgt), SFD, and biopsy score was used to predict recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year. Primary analysis consisted of a logistic regression model of outcome (odds of developing eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year), a linear regression model of outcome (predicting recipient eGFR at one-year, using the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration formula), and a Monte Carlo simulation based on the linear regression model (N=10,000 iterations). RESULTS: In the study cohort, the mean Vol/Wgt and eGFR at 1 year were 2.04 mL/kg and 60.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Volume and split ratios between 2 donor kidneys were strongly correlated (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). The biopsy scores among SFD categories (<5%, 5%-10%, >10%) were not different (P = 0.190). On multivariate models, only Vol/Wgt was significantly associated with higher odds of having eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m (odds ratio, 8.94, 95% CI 2.47-32.25, P = 0.001) and had a strong discriminatory power in predicting the risk of eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year [receiver operating curve (ROC curve), 0.78, 95% CI, 0.68-0.89]. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of donor renal anatomic asymmetry, Vol/Wgt appears to be a major determinant of recipient renal function at 1 year after transplantation. Renography can be replaced with CT volume calculation in estimating split renal function.
Authors: Andrew D Rule; Hatem Amer; Lynn D Cornell; Sandra J Taler; Fernando G Cosio; Walter K Kremers; Stephen C Textor; Mark D Stegall Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Eduardo Mancilla; Carmen Avila-Casado; Norma Uribe-Uribe; Luis E Morales-Buenrostro; Francisco Rodríguez; Mario Vilatoba; Bernardo Gabilondo; Salvador Aburto; Roxana M Rodríguez; Salvador Magaña; Fernando Magaña; Josefina Alberú Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-12-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Adam L Summerlin; Mark E Lockhart; Andrew M Strang; Peter N Kolettis; Naomi S Fineberg; J Kevin Smith Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: E D Poggio; S Hila; B Stephany; R Fatica; V Krishnamurthi; C del Bosque; D Goldfarb; B Herts; V W Dennis; P S Heeger; W Braun Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael Abecassis; Stephen T Bartlett; Allan J Collins; Connie L Davis; Francis L Delmonico; John J Friedewald; Rebecca Hays; Andrew Howard; Edward Jones; Alan B Leichtman; Robert M Merion; Robert A Metzger; Francoise Pradel; Eugene J Schweitzer; Ruben L Velez; Robert S Gaston Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-02-06 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: David P Al-Adra; Maria Lambadaris; Andrew Barbas; Yanhong Li; Markus Selzner; Sunita K Singh; Olusegun Famure; S Joseph Kim; Anand Ghanekar Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Alexander Kaltenborn; Almut Nolte; Ysabell Schwager; Simon A Littbarski; Nikos Emmanouilidis; Viktor Arelin; Jürgen Klempnauer; Harald Schrem Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.445