| Literature DB >> 30542585 |
Vincenzo Grande1,2, Chia-An Shen1, Marco Deiana3, Marta Dudek3, Joanna Olesiak-Banska3, Katarzyna Matczyszyn3, Frank Würthner1,2.
Abstract
Fluorescence imaging probes for specific G-quadruplex (G4) conformations are of considerable interest in biomedical research. Herein, we present the synthesis and the binding properties of a new water-soluble near-infrared (NIR) amphiphilic squaraine dye (CAS-C1) which is capable of selective detection of parallel over non-parallel and non G4 topologies. The striking changes in its linear optical response upon binding to parallel G4s give rise to high fluorescence quantum yields (Φ f ≈ 0.7) and one-photon molecular brightness in the far-red-NIR region. The outstanding recognition process of CAS-C1 for parallel G4s via end-stacking provides binding constants in the nanomolar regime (K b = 107 to 108 M-1) awarding it as one of the most potent parallel G4 binders currently available. Moreover, the CAS-C1-parallel G4 system exhibits large two-photon absorption (TPA) cross-sections and molecular brightness in the second NIR biological transparency window (λ ≈ 1275 nm), making it an ideal candidate for NIR-to-NIR ultrasensitive two-photon procedures.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30542585 PMCID: PMC6240894 DOI: 10.1039/c8sc02882f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1(a) Synthetic route to CAS-C1. (b) Schematic illustration of the multiphotonic selective detection mechanism: the squaraine shows amphiphilic assembly in water into micelles. The formation of a stable complex with parallel G-quadruplex (left) is able to displace the squaraine from the micellar aggregate and trigger the fluorescent emission in the NIR-I biological window upon both one-photon excitation in the NIR-I and two-photon excitation in the NIR-II. CAS-C1 bestows high selectivity of interactions over non-quadruplex and non-parallel G4 structures (right).
Fig. 2(a) UV/Vis absorption spectra of an aqueous CAS-C1 solution (c = 3.0 × 10–6 M, 25 °C, red line) and upon addition of increasing amounts of SDS. The inset shows the incorporation of the squaraine dye in the SDS micelle upon addition of the surfactant with a critical concentration of 2.1 × 10–3 M. (b) AFM height images on mica after spin coating the CAS-C1 aqueous solution (3.0 × 10–6 M). Z scale is 1.2 nm. (c) Cross-section from yellow dashed lines 1–1′.
Fig. 3(a) Visible/NIR absorption (solid lines) and fluorescence spectra (dotted lines, excitation on the isosbestic point at 660 nm) of a CAS-C1 buffered solution in water (1.66 × 10–6 M, TRIS buffer c = 10 mM, pH = 7.2, KCl c = 100 mM) upon addition of c-myc G4 at 25 °C (red and blue lines correspond to the spectra at 0 eq. and 3.4 eq. respectively. Superimposed black dotted line results from a global fitting with a 1 : 1 binding model (Kb = 9.7 × 106 M–1). (b) Fluorescence titrations of the CAS-C1 buffered solution in water upon addition of various G4s sequences at 25 °C: the plots show a clear-cut preference of the squaraine for the parallel G4s (in red). (c and d) Docking lowest energy binding models for CAS-C1 with c-myc (score function ΔE =–5.9 kcal mol–1).
Summary of the spectroscopic properties and the binding constants of the complexes of CAS-C1 with various G4s
| G-quadruplex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| sG4 | 699 | 114 | 722 | 8.1 × 106 | — | 5.8 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 84 |
| VAV-1 | 699 | 118 | 722 | 1.2 × 107 | — | 5.6 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 79 |
| c-myc | 699 | 108 | 721 | 1.0 × 107 | — | 5.5 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 56 |
| 25Ceb | 698 | 108 | 719 | 9.0 × 105 | — | 6.0 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 71 |
| VEGF | 699 | 113 | 721 | 1.6 × 102 | 3.7 × 109 | 5.7 | 0.74 ± 0.08 | 84 |
| Kras 22 | 699 | 116 | 721 | 1.5 × 107 | 1.7 × 106 | 5.4 | — | — |
| Kras 32 | 699 | 103 | 721 | 5.9 × 106 | 4.1 × 105 | 5.6 | — | — |
| bcl-2 | 699 | 113 | 721 | 36 | 6.0 × 108 | — | — | — |
| ckit-87up | 699 | 103 | 721 | 3.1 × 102 | 4.3 × 108 | 5.5 | — | — |
| ckit-2 | 699 | 92 | 720 | 5.0 × 102 | 4.0 × 108 | — | — | — |
Data fitting with 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 models was performed according to ref. 28 and the software provided at the website http://supramolecular.org. We like to note that the credibility of the derived values for the 1 : 2 case is lower than for the 1 : 1 case. This is due to the presence of three species and unknown fluorescence quantum yields of the 1 : 1 and the 1 : 2 complexes, and changing amounts of these complexes during the titration experiment. To give the same weight to UV/Vis and fluorescence experiments we evaluated both titrations independently and took the average values.
Fig. 4Two-photon molecular brightness (σ2 × ΦF) plot of CAS-C1 in the presence of VEGF, VAV-1 and c-myc (10 mM Tris, 100 mM K+, pH 7.2) at molar ratio (r) = 7. The values of the ΦF used are tabulated in Table 1. As a comparison, the OPA corresponding to the double of the energy of the TPA is shown (top and right axis): the absorption (dotted lines) and emission (dashed line) spectra corresponding to the CAS-C1 complexes with the G4s are shown.