Leeanne McGurk1, Edward Gomes2, Lin Guo2, James Shorter2, Nancy M Bonini1. 1. Department of Biology , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States. 2. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics , Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States.
Abstract
TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) forms granulo-filamentous aggregates in affected brain regions of >95% of patients with ALS and ∼50% of patients with frontotemporal degeneration (FTD). Furthermore, in disease, TDP-43 becomes N-terminally truncated resulting in protein deposits that are mainly composed of the C-terminal prion-like domain (PrLD). The PrLD is inherently aggregation-prone and is hypothesized to drive protein aggregation of TDP-43 in disease. Here, we establish that the N-terminal region of the protein is critical for rapid TDP-43 granulo-filamentous aggregation. We show that the biopolymer poly(ADP-ribose), or PAR, inhibits granulo-filamentous aggregation of TDP-43 by engaging PAR-binding motifs (PBMs) embedded in the TDP-43 nuclear-localization sequence. We demonstrate that progressive N-terminal truncation of TDP-43 can decelerate aggregation kinetics and promote formation of thread-like filaments. Thus, the N-terminal region and the PBMs of TDP-43 promote rapid granulo-filamentous aggregation and antagonize formation of thread-like fibrils. These findings illustrate the complexity of TDP-43 aggregation trajectories.
TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) forms granulo-filamentous aggregates in affected brain regions of >95% of patients with ALS and ∼50% of patients with frontotemporal degeneration (FTD). Furthermore, in disease, TDP-43 becomes N-terminally truncated resulting in protein deposits that are mainly composed of the C-terminal prion-like domain (PrLD). The PrLD is inherently aggregation-prone and is hypothesized to drive protein aggregation of TDP-43 in disease. Here, we establish that the N-terminal region of the protein is critical for rapid TDP-43 granulo-filamentous aggregation. We show that the biopolymer poly(ADP-ribose), or PAR, inhibits granulo-filamentous aggregation of TDP-43 by engaging PAR-binding motifs (PBMs) embedded in the TDP-43 nuclear-localization sequence. We demonstrate that progressive N-terminal truncation of TDP-43 can decelerate aggregation kinetics and promote formation of thread-like filaments. Thus, the N-terminal region and the PBMs of TDP-43 promote rapid granulo-filamentous aggregation and antagonize formation of thread-like fibrils. These findings illustrate the complexity of TDP-43 aggregation trajectories.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
(ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive
inclusions (FTLD-U) are two fatal neurodegenerative disorders characterized
by the presence of insoluble aggregates of TAR DNA-binding protein
of 43 kDa (TDP-43) in affected brain regions.[1,2] To
date, most of the disease-causing mutations in TDP-43 occur in the
C-terminal prion-like domain (PrLD).[3] PrLDs
are intrinsically disordered regions that can switch from unfolded
states to self-templating fibril forms such as the amyloid-like cross-β
fibrils.[3−7] The majority of TDP-43 aggregates in ALS/FTLD-U patients have the
appearance of granular filaments, but a subset have amyloid-like qualities.[8−11] Full-length TDP-43 forms granulo-filamentous aggregates in vitro that can transition into thread-like fibrils.[4,12,13] This transition is promoted by
certain disease-linked mutations in the PrLD, including Q331K.[12] An emerging hypothesis is that the PrLD of TDP-43
may drive the protein aggregation observed in disease.[12]PrLDs have also been implicated in liquid–liquid
phase separation
(LLPS), a process by which proteins condense into reversible liquid
droplets.[14−16] Of interest are the ALS-linked proteins hnRNPA1,
FUS, and TDP-43 which undergo LLPS in vitro.[4,16−20] We uncovered that the biopolymer poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) potently
promotes TDP-43 LLPS in vitro(20) and that PAR is elevated in ALS motor neuron nuclei.[21] PAR is generated by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases
(PARPs),[22] and inhibitors of various PARPs
(PARP-1, PARP-2, PARP-5a, and PARP-5b) mitigate cytoplasmic aggregation
of TDP-43 and TDP-43-associated toxicity to primary neurons and in Drosophila.[20,21] These findings raised the possibility
that PAR may directly regulate TDP-43 aggregation.To determine
if PAR could impact TDP-43 aggregation, we purified
full-length humanTDP-43 with a His6-SUMO solubility tag[23] (Figures S1A and S2A). At physiological concentrations of TDP-43 protein,[24] cleavage of the His6-SUMO tag with
ubiquitin-like specific protease (Ulp1) induced TDP-43 aggregation
over a 200 min period (Figure A). The addition of PAR to His6-SUMO-TDP-43-WT
significantly reduced TDP-43-WT aggregation (Figure A, Figure S2B,C), while mono(ADP-ribose) had no effect (Figure B). Our previous studies established that
LLPS of TDP-43 can occur in the presence of a crowding reagent and
is promoted by PAR.[20] We examined TDP-43-WT
by differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy; before cleavage
with and without PAR, the protein remained diffuse and did not form
any visible micron-sized aggregates (Figure S3A). However, 30 min after Ulp-1 cleavage, we observed the formation
of spherical droplets that appeared to coalesce into solid structures
after a further 30 min (Figure S3B). Our
present data indicate that under conditions that lack a crowding reagent,
PAR reduces filamentous aggregation of TDP-43.
Figure 1
PAR inhibits TDP-43 aggregation.
(A) Ulp1-cleavage of His6-SUMO-TDP-43-WT increased optical
density (OD). Co-incubation with
6 μM PAR reduced the optical density of TDP-43-WT. (B) Mono(ADP-ribose)
(mADPr, 6 μM) had no effect on the optical density of TDP-43-WT.
PAR inhibits TDP-43 aggregation.
(A) Ulp1-cleavage of His6-SUMO-TDP-43-WT increased optical
density (OD). Co-incubation with
6 μM PAR reduced the optical density of TDP-43-WT. (B) Mono(ADP-ribose)
(mADPr, 6 μM) had no effect on the optical density of TDP-43-WT.The nuclear-localization sequence
(NLS) of TDP-43 is a region of
intrinsic disorder[25] (Figure S1B) and is critical for physically binding to PAR and
as well as LLPS of TDP-43 in vitro.[20] In contrast to cleaved His6-SUMO-TDP-43-WT,
cleaved His6-SUMO-TDP-43-ΔPAR-binding motif (PBM)
(Figure S4A) exhibited decelerated aggregation
kinetics (Figure A)
and took over 18 h to aggregate (Figure B). The addition of PAR had no effect on
the aggregation of TDP-43-ΔPBM (Figure B and Figure S4B). Examination of TDP-43-ΔPBM before cleavage revealed no preformed
micron-sized aggregates (Figure S3A). Thus,
the N-terminal region of TDP-43, and specifically the PBMs, enables
rapid aggregation of TDP-43, and PAR engages PBMs within the NLS to
reduce TDP-43 aggregation.
Figure 2
PAR-binding motifs enable rapid TDP-43 aggregation.
(A) Compared
to TDP-43-WT, the TDP-43-ΔPAR-binding motif (PBM) did not aggregate
in the same time frame. (B) TDP-43-ΔPBM aggregated over 54 h.
PAR (6 μM) had no effect on the optical density of TDP-43-ΔPBM.
PAR-binding motifs enable rapid TDP-43 aggregation.
(A) Compared
to TDP-43-WT, the TDP-43-ΔPAR-binding motif (PBM) did not aggregate
in the same time frame. (B) TDP-43-ΔPBM aggregated over 54 h.
PAR (6 μM) had no effect on the optical density of TDP-43-ΔPBM.Transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) revealed that cleavage of
the His6-SUMO tag from both TDP-43-WT and TDP-43-ΔPBM
led to the formation of granulo-filamentous aggregates (Figure A), consistent with previous
TEM studies and of TDP-43 aggregates in human tissue.[8,10,12] PAR did not drastically alter
the structure of the TDP-43-WT or TDP-43-ΔPBM aggregates (Figure A). However, PAR
significantly reduced the overall size of the TDP-43-WT aggregates,
while having no effect on the size of the TDP-43-ΔPBM aggregates
(Figure B). Indeed,
PAR promoted retention of TDP-43-WT in the supernatant fraction after
low-speed centrifugation (Figure C and Figure S5). Thus,
we propose that PAR reduces granulo-filamentous aggregation of TDP-43
via an interaction with PBMs embedded within the NLS.
Figure 3
PAR reduces TDP-43 aggregation.
(A) Ulp1 cleavage of HIS6-SUMO-TDP-43-WT and HIS6-SUMO-TDP-43-ΔPBM led to
granulo-filamentous aggregation (hatched boxes). PAR (6 μM)
reduced aggregate size of TDP-43-WT and had no effect on TDP-43-ΔPBM
(hatched boxes). (B) Quantification of aggregate size. Mean (±SD),
one-way ANOVA (P < 0.0001), and Kruskal–Wallis
test. (C) PAR (6 μM) reduced the amount of TDP-43-WT in the
pellet fraction at 400g (Figure S5). Mean (±SD), two-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s test.
PAR reduces TDP-43 aggregation.
(A) Ulp1 cleavage of HIS6-SUMO-TDP-43-WT and HIS6-SUMO-TDP-43-ΔPBM led to
granulo-filamentous aggregation (hatched boxes). PAR (6 μM)
reduced aggregate size of TDP-43-WT and had no effect on TDP-43-ΔPBM
(hatched boxes). (B) Quantification of aggregate size. Mean (±SD),
one-way ANOVA (P < 0.0001), and Kruskal–Wallis
test. (C) PAR (6 μM) reduced the amount of TDP-43-WT in the
pellet fraction at 400g (Figure S5). Mean (±SD), two-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s test.In ALS and FTLD-U, splicing defects
and proteolytic cleavage can
elicit formation of TDP-43 C-terminal fragments that contain the PrLD.[26−28] As the C-terminal fragments of TDP-43 either contain a partial PAR-binding
region (TDP-43-C35) or lack the PAR-binding region (TDP-43-C25) (Figure S1A), we examined the aggregation kinetics
of these two C-terminal fragments. Strikingly, the ability of TDP-43-C35
and TDP-43-C25 to form turbid aggregates was, like TDP-43-ΔPBM,
reduced compared to TDP-43-WT (Figure A). Examination by TEM revealed that TDP-43-C35 formed
granulo-filamentous aggregates, whereas TDP-43-C25 formed granulo-filamentous
aggregates and thread-like fibrils (Figure B). The TDP-43-C25 aggregates were unreactive
to the amyloid diagnostic dye Thioflavin T (Figure S6). Combined, these data reveal that the N-terminal portion
of TDP-43 contributes to granulo-filamentous aggregation and antagonizes
the transition into thread-like oligomers.
Figure 4
C-terminal fragments
of TDP-43 have altered aggregation properties.
(A) The increase in optical density of TDP-43-C35 and TDP-43-C25 was
reduced compared to TDP-43-WT. (B) TDP-43-WT, TDP-43-C35, and TDP-43-C25
formed granulo-filamentous protein aggregates (black arrows). TDP-43-C25
also formed thread-like aggregates (white arrows).
C-terminal fragments
of TDP-43 have altered aggregation properties.
(A) The increase in optical density of TDP-43-C35 and TDP-43-C25 was
reduced compared to TDP-43-WT. (B) TDP-43-WT, TDP-43-C35, and TDP-43-C25
formed granulo-filamentous protein aggregates (black arrows). TDP-43-C25
also formed thread-like aggregates (white arrows).Here, we show that N-terminal portions of TDP-43
contribute to
granulo-filamentous aggregation. Our data indicate that PAR interacts
with PBMs embedded within the NLS of TDP-43 to reduce granulo-filamentous
aggregation. Defining the mechanism by which PAR binding reduces TDP-43
aggregation will require further study. Regions within the N-terminal
domain of TDP-43 regulate self-oligomerization.[25,29−32]Thus, PAR-binding to the NLS adjacent to the N-terminal domain may
physically block interactions that contribute toward aggregation.
In disease, TDP-43 aggregates appear to be predominantly granulo-filamentous.
Thus, agents that antagonize contributions from the N-terminal region
of TDP-43 could have therapeutic utility. However, as oligomerization
is essential for TDP-43 function,[25,29−32] agents that prevent this functional oligomerization could be detrimental.
Understanding under what circumstances functional versus toxic TDP-43
assemblies form,[33] how they differ, and
how they are resolved will help develop therapeutic strategies to
selectively target toxic assemblies.
Authors: Dylan T Murray; Masato Kato; Yi Lin; Kent R Thurber; Ivan Hung; Steven L McKnight; Robert Tycko Journal: Cell Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Meredith E Jackrel; Morgan E DeSantis; Bryan A Martinez; Laura M Castellano; Rachel M Stewart; Kim A Caldwell; Guy A Caldwell; James Shorter Journal: Cell Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Masato Kato; Tina W Han; Shanhai Xie; Kevin Shi; Xinlin Du; Leeju C Wu; Hamid Mirzaei; Elizabeth J Goldsmith; Jamie Longgood; Jimin Pei; Nick V Grishin; Douglas E Frantz; Jay W Schneider; She Chen; Lin Li; Michael R Sawaya; David Eisenberg; Robert Tycko; Steven L McKnight Journal: Cell Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: L McGurk; J Mojsilovic-Petrovic; V M Van Deerlin; J Shorter; R G Kalb; V M Lee; J Q Trojanowski; E B Lee; N M Bonini Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 7.801