| Literature DB >> 30533028 |
Isabel Garcia-Martin1, Richard J A Penketh2, Anna B Janssen1, Rhiannon E Jones3, Julia Grimstead3, Duncan M Baird3, Rosalind M John1.
Abstract
Shortened leukocyte and placental telomeres associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) suggest this exposure triggers telomere attrition contributing to adverse outcomes. We applied high resolution Single Telomere Length Analysis (STELA) to placenta from GDM pregnancies with different treatment pathways to determine their effectiveness at preventing telomere attrition. Differences in telomere length between control (N = 69), GDM lifestyle intervention (n = 14) and GDM treated with metformin and/or insulin (n = 17) was tested by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) followed by group comparisons using Fisher's least significant difference. For male placenta only, there were differences in mean telomere length (F(2,54) = 4.98, P = 0.01) and percentage of telomeres under 5 kb (F(2,54) = 4.65, P = 0.01). Telomeres were shorter in the GDM lifestyle intervention group compared to both controls (P = 0.02) and medically treated pregnancies (P = 0.003). There were more telomeres under 5 kb in the GDM lifestyle intervention group compared to the other two groups (P = 0.03 and P = 0.004). Although further work is necessary, we suggest that early adoption of targeted medical treatment of GDM pregnancies where the fetus is known to be male may be an effective strategy for ameliorating adverse outcomes for children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30533028 PMCID: PMC6289439 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Maternal, birth and metabolic characteristics.
Mean (SD) or number (%) is shown. Note: due to missing values, some numbers do not add up to 100%. P values were assessed using Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney test or χ2.test.
| Study participants | GDM group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 31 | N = 69 | ||
| 26 (84%) | 62 (90%) | 0.08 | |
| 3 (9.7%) | 7 (10.1%) | 0.88 | |
| 17 (54.8%) | 51 (74%) | ||
| 33 (3.9) | 31 (5.8) | 0.20 | |
| 33 (7.0) | 31 (6.3) | 0.26 | |
| 10.9 (8.9) | 13.3 (8.3) | 0.35 | |
| 31 (100%) | 69 (100%) | NA | |
| 1 (3.2%) | 8 (11.6%) | 0.23 | |
| 2 (6.5%) | 9 (13%) | 0.76 | |
| 5.6(1.2) | 4.55(0.5) | ||
| 8.7(2.1) | 5.46(1.3) | ||
| 3714 (433.6) | 3734 (562.0) | 0.86 | |
| 38 (0.6) | 39 (0.7) | ||
| 701 (131.8) | 723 (133.4) | 0.43 | |
| 20 (64.5%) | 38 (55.1%) | 0.37 | |
| 11 (35.5%) | 31 (44.9%) |
Maternal and birth characteristics in the lifestyle intervention and the medication group.
Mean (SD) is shown. P values were assessed using Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney test.
| GDM participants | Lifestyle intervention group (GDM) | Medication group (GDM+M) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 14 | N = 17 | ||
| Maternal age | 34 (3.6) | 32 (3.9) | 0.11 |
| Maternal BMI | 30 (8.3) | 32 (6.01) | 0.38 |
| Weight gain | 11.2 (13.0) | 10.8 (5.5) | 0.93 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3734 (503) | 3697 (382) | 0.81 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 38 (0.60) | 38 (0.63) | 0.98 |
| Placental weight (g) | 691 (149.81) | 709 (119.12) | 0.70 |