| Literature DB >> 30532185 |
Desiree Willkommen1, Marianna Lucio1, Franco Moritz1, Sara Forcisi1, Basem Kanawati1, Kirill S Smirnov1, Michael Schroeter2, Ali Sigaroudi3,4, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin1,5, Bernhard Michalke1.
Abstract
The underlying mechanisms of Parkinson´s disease are not completely revealed. Especially, early diagnostic biomarkers are lacking. To characterize early pathophysiological events, research is focusing on metabolomics. In this case-control study we investigated the metabolic profile of 31 Parkinson´s disease-patients in comparison to 95 neurologically healthy controls. The investigation of metabolites in CSF was performed by a 12 Tesla SolariX Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance-mass spectrometer (FT-ICR-MS). Multivariate statistical analysis sorted the most important biomarkers in relation to their ability to differentiate Parkinson versus control. The affected metabolites, their connection and their conversion pathways are described by means of network analysis. The metabolic profiling by FT-ICR-MS in CSF yielded in a good group separation, giving insights into the disease mechanisms. A total number of 243 metabolites showed an affected intensity in Parkinson´s disease, whereas 15 of these metabolites seem to be the main biological contributors. The network analysis showed a connection to the tricarboxylic cycle (TCA cycle) and therefore to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress within mitochondria. The metabolomic analysis of CSF in Parkinson´s disease showed an association to pathways which are involved in lipid/ fatty acid metabolism, energy metabolism, glutathione metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30532185 PMCID: PMC6287824 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of PD and controls.
| Parkinson Patients | Healthy controls | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of CSF-samples | n = 31 | n = 95 |
| Age (years) | 65.5 ± 12.2 | 44.9 ± 17.3 |
| Sex (f/m) | 9/22 | 59/36 |
| duration of disease (years) | 0,87 ± 2,2 | / |
Most important neutral masses to distinguish between PD and controls with respective molecular formula, possible compounds assignment and mean intensity ± standard deviation (SD).
The p-values are the result of the general linear model (GLM) adjusted with DUNNET.
| Neutral mass | Theoretical molecular ion mass | molecular formula | Ion formula | Compound most probable in CSF | Mean Intensity ± SD control | Mean Intensity ± SD Parkinson´s disease | alteration in Parkinson´s disease | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 129.04261 | 128.03534 | C5H7NO3 | [C5H6NO3]- | 5-Oxoproline | 1.05E+06 ± 1.09E+06 | 1.5E+06 ± 1.27E+06 | ↑ | 0.0795 |
| 188.01433 | 187.00705 | C7H8O4S | [C7H7O4S]- | p-cresol sulfate | 5.74E+04 ± 3.23E+05 | 5.33E+05 ± 1.03E+06 | ↑ | 0.0002 |
| 186.06411 | 185.05684 | C7H10N2O4 | [C7H9N2O4]- | S-AMPA | 1.49E+05 ± 4.69E+05 | 0.0E+0 0± 0.0E+0.0 | ↓ | 0.2695 |
| 192.06343 | 191.05616 | C7H12O6 | [C7H11O6]- | Quinic acid | 6.30E+05 ± 1.02E+06 | 1.07E+06 ± 1.3E+06 | ↑ | 0.019 |
| 260.02032 | 259.01305 | C6H12O9S | [C6H11O9S]- | D-Glucose-6-sulfate | 4.1E+05 ± 8.18E+05 | 5.54E+05 ± 8.94E+05 | ↑ | 0.3258 |
| 163.09980 | 162.09253 | C10H13NO | [C10H12NO]- | N-Acetylphenyl-ethylamine | 1.5E+04 ± 1.48E+05 | 1.49E+05 ± 4.66E+05 | ↑ | 0.0578 |
| 210.07402 | 209.06675 | C7H14O7 | [C7H13O7]- | Sedoheptulose | 1.31E+06 ± 1.14E+06 | 8.06E+05 ± 9.76E+05 | ↓ | 0.0701 |
| 268.07956 | 267.07228 | C9H16O9 | [C9H15O9]- | α-mannosylglycerate | 1.32E+06 ± 1.49E+06 | 1.78E+06 ± 1.78E+06 | ↑ | 0.1406 |
| 172.14637 | 171.13910 | C10H20O2 | [C10H19O2]- | Decanoic acid | 4.69E+04 ± 2.64E+05 | 2.38E+05 ± 6.42E+05 | ↑ | 0.0116 |
| 188.14116 | 187.13389 | C10H20O3 | [C10H19O3]- | 10-Hydroxydecanoic acid | 1.67E+04 ± 1.64E+05 | 1.76E+05 ± 5.5E+05 | ↑ | 0.0129 |
| 234.16207 | 233.15480 | C15H22O2 | [C15H21O2]- | Valerenic acid | 8.67E+05 ± 1.06E+06 | 1.23E+06 ±1.19E+06 | ↑ | 0.1567 |
| 304.24043 | 303.23316 | C20H32O2 | [C22H31O2]- | Arachidonic acid | 4.01E+05 ± 8.42E+05 | 9.15E+05 ± 1.52E+06 | ↑ | 0.0494 |
| 306.25612 | 305.24885 | C20H34O2 | [C20H33O2]- | Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid | 6.61E+05 ± 1.28E+06 | 8.62E+05 ± 1.19E+06 | ↑ | 0.4911 |
| 622.55332 | 621.54604 | C39H74O5 | [C39H73O5]- | DG (36:1) | 1.73E+06 ± 2.23E+06 | 8.17E+05 ± 1.62E+06 | ↓ | 0.0677 |
| 747.61377 | 746.60650 | C42H86NO7P | [C42H85NO7P]- | PC/PE | 1.58E+06 ± 1.29E+06 | 1.09E+06 ± 1.24E+06 | ↓ | 0.0291 |
Fig 1The implemented statistical analysis models.
A) sPLS-DA and B) OPLS-DA both validated with 7 fold cross-validation, C) compounds, which significantly distinguished PD from controls, D) and E) represented the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the classification error rates by which the number of components was tuned (7 cross-validation), F) compared intensities of selected lipids. expl. var., explorative variance.
Fig 2A) theory behind the network analysis shown for a specific example, B), over-represented Δm for PD as characterized by respective Z-scores.
Fig 3Over-represented metabolites within the TCA cycle.
Metabolites directly found with network analysis are colored orange. Metabolites indirectly found either by substrates for synthesis of the respective compound (colored red) or by break-down products of the respective compound (colored purple).