| Literature DB >> 31866853 |
Marianna Lucio1, Desiree Willkommen1, Michael Schroeter2, Ali Sigaroudi3,4, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin1,5, Bernhard Michalke1.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with a complex etiology. Several factors are known to contribute to the disease onset and its progression. However, the complete underlying mechanisms are still escaping our understanding. To evaluate possible correlations between metabolites and metallomic data, in this research, we combined a control study measured using two different platforms. For the different data sources, we applied a Block Sparse Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis (Block-sPLS-DA) model that allows for proving their relation, which in turn uncovers alternative influencing factors that remain hidden otherwise. We found two groups of variables that trace a strong relationship between metallomic and metabolomic parameters for disease development. The results confirmed that the redox active metals iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) together with fatty acids are the major influencing factors for the PD. Additionally, the metabolic waste product p-cresol sulfate and the trace element nickel (Ni) showed up as potentially important factors in PD. In summary, the data integration of different types of measurements emphasized the results of both stand-alone measurements providing a new comprehensive set of information and interactions, on PD disease, between different variables sources.Entities:
Keywords: Block-sPLS-DA; Parkinson’s disease; data integration; metabolomics; metallomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31866853 PMCID: PMC6908950 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Characteristics of PD and controls.
| Number of CSF samples | ||
| Age average (years) | 65.1 ± 12.9 | 44.8 ± 17.3 |
| Sex (f/m) | 10/23 | 63/38 |
| Duration of disease (years) | 1.39 ± 3.7 | – |
FIGURE 1Statistical modeling of the two datasets. (A) Map of the samples belonging to the block of metallomics and metabolomics that showed separately the control vs. disease separation; (B) the correlation values for the PD patients and Control divided for the metabolomic and metallomic blocks showing increased concentrations/ratios for either PD or Control; and (C) classification performance, the error rates stabilized after the second component.
The first group of related variables and their p values (test the difference, Control vs. Disease).
| Metallomics | IOS (Zn) | 0.0146 |
| Metallomics | AA(Fe) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.0199 |
| Metallomics | Cit(Zn) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.6381 |
| Metallomics | Cu (HMM%) | 0.1081 |
| Metabolomics | p-cresol sulfate | 0.0006 |
| Metallomics | IOS(Zn) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.1781 |
| Metallomics | Fe (IOS) | 0.6447 |
| Metallomics | LMM(Mn) vs. LMM(Cu) | 0.0261 |
| Metallomics | AA(Mn) vs. LMM(Cu) | 0.3393 |
| Metallomics | Fe (LMM + IOS) | 0.7717 |
| Metallomics | IOS(Zn) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.5994 |
| Metallomics | total c(Fe) vs. LMM(Cu) | 0.0069 |
| Metallomics | LMM/IOS(Zn) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.3438 |
| Metallomics | LMM(Mn) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.0223 |
| Metallomics | IOS(Fe) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.1049 |
| Metallomics | total c(Fe) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.0245 |
| Metallomics | IOS(Mn) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.0278 |
| Metallomics | total c(Fe) vs. AA(Cu) | 0.1349 |
The second group of related variables and their p values (test the difference, Control vs. Disease).
| Metallomics | Ni (Glu) Ni associated with glutamate | 0.6634 |
| Metallomics | Ni (Ile) | 0.3033 |
| Metabolomics | Valerenic acid | 0.1180 |
| Metabolomics | Mannosylglycerate | 0.4745 |
| Metabolomics | Quinic acid | 0.0291 |
| Metallomics | Cu (His) Cu associated with histidine | <0.0001 |
| Metabolomics | Arachidonic acid | 0.0013 |
| Metabolomics | Decanoic acid | 0.7490 |
| Metallomics | Ni (Arg) Ni associated with arginine | 0.1524 |
| Metabolomics | 10-Hydroxydecanoic acid | 0.0125 |
FIGURE 2The resulting loadings plot structure (in the first and second component) aimed at highlighting the multiple interrelations between the metallomic (green dots) and the previously defined biomarkers (red dots). The variables are up-regulated in PD. The yellow box contains the variables presented in Table 2, while the orange box contains the variables listed in Table 3. AA, amino acid; Arg, arginine; Cit, citrate; DGLA, dihomo-γ-linoleic acid; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamic acid; His, histidine; HMM, high molecular mass; Ile, isoleucine; IOS, inorganic species; LMM, low molecular mass; Phe, phenylalanine; SeM, selenomethionine; Ser, serine.
FIGURE 3Box plots of the individual variations in PD compared to control for the strongest correlating parameters. All concentrations/ratios are increased in PD.