| Literature DB >> 30531650 |
Eui-Suk Sung1, Jin-Choon Lee1, Sung-Chan Shin2, Hyun-Geun Kwon2, Min-Sik Kim1, Dong-Jo Kim1, Jung-Hoon Ro3, Byung-Joo Lee2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: False-negative or false-positive responses in intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) using electromyography (EMG) in thyroid surgery pose a challenge. Therefore, we developed a novel IONM system that uses a surface pressure sensor instead of EMG to detect muscle twitching. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of a new IONM system using a piezo-electric surface pressure sensor in an experimental animal model.Entities:
Keywords: Electromyography; Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring; Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve; Surface Pressure Sensor; Thyroidectomy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30531650 PMCID: PMC6453788 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2018.01207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1976-8710 Impact factor: 3.372
Fig. 1.Photographs of the surgical field on the rabbit, demonstrating dissection using the surface pressure sensor. (A) Left sciatic nerve. (B) Modified patch-type piezo-electric surface pressure sensor. (C) A needle-electrode electromyography and modified patch-type piezo-electric surface pressure sensor on the skin. (D) Sciatic nerve stimulation with the nerve probe.
Analysis of the amplitude and latency of the EMG and surface pressure sensor depending on the value of the sciatic nerve stimulus in rabbits
| Stimulus (mA) | EMG | Surface pressure sensor | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response (n) | Amplitude (μV) | Latency (ms) | Response (n) | Amplitude (μV) | Latency (ms) | Amplitude | Latency | |
| 0.02 | 1 | 681 | 3.5 | 1 | 144 | 26 | - | - |
| 0.03 | 1 | 337 | 7.7 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| 0.05 | 5 | 812.4±840.7 | 5.4±1.8 | 5 | 312.2±351.0 | 34.6±3.7 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 0.1 | 6 | 2,567.8±3,806.1 | 5.7±1.6 | 6 | 525.6±519.3 | 30.0±4.3 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 0.5 | 6 | 3,957.0±4,511.0 | 6.2±1.9 | 6 | 532.0±346.8 | 26.4±3.7 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 1.0 | 6 | 3,978.3±2,977.3 | 5.9±1.8 | 6 | 686.3±369.4 | 26.4±2.5 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 2.0 | 6 | 2,608.6±464.7 | 6.5±2.2 | 6 | 751.6±448.0 | 27.7±2.5 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 3.0 | 6 | 2,088.4±1,338.8 | 6.5±2.2 | 6 | 785.2±413.5 | 27.1±2.5 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Total | 2,598.6±2,850.9 | 6.0±1.8 | 584.0±413.5 | 28.1±3.6 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
EMG, electromyography.
P-value indicates the result of the comparison test for the mean response values of the amplitude and latency between the EMG and surface pressure sensor depending on stimulus value.
Fig. 2.Electromyography (EMG) and piezo-electric surface pressure sensor recordings, showing the amplitude and latency of the EMG and surface pressure sensor for 0.3 mA stimulation using the Nerve Integrity Monitor (NIM) 3.0 system in one rabbit. (A) EMG signal. (B) The modified piezo-electric surface pressure sensor signal.