Literature DB >> 30524165

Intraocular Pressure After Corneal Refractive Surgery.

Valbon Ajazaj1, Gazmend Kaçaniku1, Minir Asani1,2, Afrim Shabani1, Ermal Dida1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), a refractive surgery procedure is being performed in a large number among people with refractive errors. In all the people undergoing the procedure, there is a potential risk to misdiagnose the glaucoma disease due to changes in central corneal thickness (CCT). In subjects who have undergone laser refractive interventions, intraocular tension may be lower and underestimated, and this can lead to later detection of glaucoma. AIM: The objective of this study was to analyze the intraocular pressure (IOP) after LASIK in patients with myopia.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients underwent LASIK intervention to treat myopia. In total, 74 eyes were treated. Before the intervention, all patients underwent complete ophthalmologic examination, including the measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) and measurement of IOP with non-contact tonometer. The IOP was also measured on days 1, 3 and 30 after the surgery. The mean IOP was taken for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Seventy-four eyes of 37 patients (mean age 31.6) underwent LASIK intervention to treat myopia. Mean CCT before the intervention was 551.9 ±31.9µm, while mean postoperative CCT was 469.8 ±45.3µm (p<0.0001). Mean preoperative IOP was 16.4mmHg while mean postoperative IOP was 11.0mmHg (p<0.0001). The average spherical equivalent was -5.9 diopters.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of IOP after LASIK refractive surgery is significant. This reduction is about 1mmHg per 1 diopter. This should be taken into account in the future in these patients because, due to the underestimation of the IOP, the glaucoma disease may be overlooked.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lasik; central corneal thickness; intraocular pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30524165      PMCID: PMC6282919          DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.341-343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Arch        ISSN: 0350-199X


INTRODUCTION

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), a refractive surgery procedure is being performed in a large number among people with refractive errors. In all the people undergoing the procedure, there is a potential risk to misdiagnose the glaucoma disease due to changes in central corneal thickness (CCT). In subjects who have undergone laser refractive interventions, intraocular tension may be lower and underestimated, and this can lead to later detection of glaucoma. The prevalence of glaucoma is low before the age of 40, but increases with age (1). The association between myopia and open angle glaucoma disease has been reported by many authors, and myopia is known as a predisposing factor for glaucoma (2, 3, 4). The non-contact tonometry is a method to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) without anesthesia, because it uses air blow to flatten the cornea. The higher the intensity of the air blow, the higher the IOP readings will be (5).

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the IOP after LASIK in patients with myopia.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients (74 eyes) were scheduled for LASIK in order to treat myopia. The age of patients ranged from 19 to 45 years of age (average 31.6 ±6.8). Complete ophthalmologic examinations were done before the surgery, including the measurement of CCT using the Scheimpflug system (Pentacam, Oculus) and measurement of IOP with non-contact tonometer (Nidek NT-2000). The CCT was measured 30 days after the surgery while the IOP was measured on the days 1, 3 and 30 after the surgery (the average IOP was taken for statistical analysis). The patients were divided into three groups, the group with spherical equivalent (SE) of diopters from 0 to 3 diopters, 3.25 to 6 diopters and the group with above 6 diopters of SE of myopia. Statistical analysis was done using MedCalc software.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (74 eyes) underwent LASIK intervention to treat myopia. The age of patients ranged from 19 to 45 (average 31.6 ±6.8). Twenty-one (56.8%) patients were female and 16 (43.24%) were male. The average CCT was reduced from 551.9 ±31.6µm preoperatively, to 469.8 ±45.3µm postoperatively [p<0.0001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 69.4–94.8]. The mean preoperative IOP was 16.4 ±2.7mmHg, while mean postoperative IOP was 11.0 ±2.4mmHg [p<0.0001, 95%, CI: 4.57–6.23] (Table 1). The mean SE was–5.9 diopter. The mean IOP reduction after LASIK was 5.4mmHg.
Table 1.

Preoperative and postoperative CCT dhe IOP values. SD = standard deviation.

Preoperative(mean ±SD)Postoperative(mean ±SD)t-testp-value
IOP (mmHg)16.4 ±2.711.0 ±2.418.4p<0.0001
CCT (µm)551.9 ±31.6469.8 ±45.320.1p<0.0001
The reduction of IOP was: at the group of myopia up to 3 diopters was 3.32mmHg (20% lower than initial IOP), at the group of myopia from 3.25 to 6 diopters the reduction of IOP was 5.58mmHg (34%) while the reduction of IOP after the correction of myopia above 6 diopters was 6.16mmHg or 38% lower than preoperative IOP. On an average, the reduction of IOP was approximately 1mmHg per 1 diopter. On statistical analysis (independent samples t-test), there was a significant difference on the reduction of postoperative IOP between the group of myopia up to 3 diopters comparing to the group of myopia with 3.25 to 6 diopters and above 6 diopters of myopia. While there was no statistical difference on the reduction of IOP pressure between the group of myopia 3.25-6 comparing to the group with 6 or more diopters of myopia (Table 2).
Table 2.

Intraocular pressure and statistical analysis of different myopia groups

Myopia groups (SE diopterst-test between different groups
0 - 33.25 - 6>60 - 3 vs. 3.25 - 60-3 vs. >63.25 vs. >6
IOP (mmHg)Before LASIK16.716.416.2p =0.79p =0.58p =0.83
IOP (mmHg)After LASIK13.410.810.1p =0.0013p =0.0003p =0.2

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to analyze the change in IOP before and after refractive surgery in myopic patients. The accuracy of IOP measurement at post-LASIK patients is critical for glaucoma diagnosis. Low IOP values after LASIK would result in a delayed diagnosis of glaucoma (6). The Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is accepted as the gold standard in IOP measurement, and there is an evidence that non-contact tonometry gives higher readings than GAT, although both methods depend on CCT (7, 8). Some authors have postulated that the non-contact tonometer is more accurate than the GAT after LASIK (9, 10), while there are some evidence that transpalpebral tonometer may be useful to control the IOP after LASIK surgery, since it does not depend on the ablation and thinning of the CCT (11). The mean reduction of IOP in our study was 5.7mmHg. Cacho et al (11) in their study noticed a reduction of IOP of 4.05mmHg after LASIK. The reduction of IOP in the study of Hsu et al was 6.3mmHg (12). Similar reduction (6.4 and 6.5mmHg) was also showed by the authors Lin et al (13) and Shousha et al (14). In our study, the highest reduction of IOP was in patients with 6 or more diopters of myopia (6.16mmHg). The average reduction of IOP was approximately 1mmHg per 1 diopter.

CONCLUSION

Corneal refractive surgery for myopia changes CCT thus making the measurement of IOP underestimated. In this study, we demonstrated that refractive surgery causes a significant lowering of IOP measured by non-contact tonometer. The IOP measured after LASIK for myopia may be reduced because of the reduced corneal thickness. Special care needs to be considered for patients with high values of myopia. This should be taken into account in the future in these patients because, due to the underestimation of the IOP, the glaucoma disease may be overlooked.
  13 in total

1.  Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK.

Authors:  Dimitrios S Siganos; Georgios I Papastergiou; Carlos Moedas
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Intraocular pressure change after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Authors:  Sheng-Yao Hsu; Yung-Chung Hsu; Rong-Kung Tsai; Chang-Ping Lin
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Refractive error, axial dimensions, and primary open-angle glaucoma: the Singapore Malay Eye Study.

Authors:  Shamira A Perera; Tien Y Wong; Wan-Ting Tay; Paul J Foster; Seang-Mei Saw; Tin Aung
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07

4.  Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  S Sudesh; M J Moseley; J R Thompson
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1993-04

5.  Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery.

Authors:  R Montés-Micó; W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Myopia and associated pathological complications.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Gus Gazzard; Edwin Chan Shih-Yen; Wei-Han Chua
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  M A El Danasoury; A El Maghraby; S J Coorpender
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Comparison of Intraocular Pressure before and after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Refractive Surgery Measured with Perkins Tonometry, Noncontact Tonometry, and Transpalpebral Tonometry.

Authors:  Isabel Cacho; Juan Sanchez-Naves; Laura Batres; Jesús Pintor; Gonzalo Carracedo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery.

Authors:  Shireen Ma Shousha; Mahmoud Ah Abo Steit; Mohamed Hm Hosny; Wael A Ewais; Ahmad Mm Shalaby
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-08

10.  Factors Influencing Intraocular Pressure Changes after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis with Flaps Created by Femtosecond Laser or Mechanical Microkeratome.

Authors:  Meng-Yin Lin; David C K Chang; Yun-Dun Shen; Yen-Kuang Lin; Chang-Ping Lin; I-Jong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of different correction formulas and measurement methods for the accurate determination of intraocular pressure after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery.

Authors:  Zhiqing Yang; Na Miao; Lixiang Wang; Ke Ma
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.