Literature DB >> 30522787

Nonfasting versus fasting lipid profile for cardiovascular risk prediction.

Anne Langsted1, Børge G Nordestgaard2.   

Abstract

Before 2009 essentially all societies, guidelines, and statements required fasting before measuring a lipid profile for cardiovascular risk prediction. This was mainly due to the increase seen in triglycerides during a fat tolerance test. However, individuals eat much less fat during a normal day and nonfasting triglycerides have been shown to be superior to fasting in predicting cardiovascular risk. Lipids and lipoproteins only change minimally in response to normal food intake: in four large prospective studies, maximal mean changes were +0.3 mmol/L (26 mg/dL) for triglycerides, -0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for total cholesterol, -0.2 mmol/L (8 mg/dL) for LDL cholesterol, and -0.1 mmol/L (4 mg/dL) for HDL cholesterol. Further, in 108,602 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study in random nonfasting samples, the highest versus the lowest quartile of triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, remnant cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and apolipoprotein B were all associated with higher risk of both ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction. Finally, lipid-lowering trials using nonfasting blood samples for assessment of lipid levels found that reducing levels of nonfasting lipids reduced the risk of cardiovascular disease. To date there is no sound scientific evidence as to why fasting should be superior to nonfasting when evaluating a lipid profile for cardiovascular risk prediction. Indeed, nonfasting samples rather than fasting samples have many obvious advantages. First, it would simplify blood sampling in the laboratory. Second, it would benefit the patient, avoiding the inconvenience of fasting and therefore needing to have blood drawn early in the day. Third, for individuals with diabetes, the risk of hypoglycaemia due to fasting would be minimised. Many countries are currently changing their guidelines towards a consensus on measuring a lipid profile for cardiovascular risk prediction in the nonfasting state, simplifying blood sampling for patients, laboratories, and clinicians worldwide.
Copyright © 2018 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LDL cholesterol; postprandial; risk scores; total cholesterol; triglycerides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30522787     DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.09.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  39 in total

1.  Macronutrient, Energy, and Bile Acid Metabolism Pathways Altered Following a Physiological Meal Challenge, Relative to Fasting, among Guatemalan Adults.

Authors:  Elaine A Yu; Tianwei Yu; Dean P Jones; Reynaldo Martorell; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Aryeh D Stein
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Fetal phthalates and bisphenols and childhood lipid and glucose metabolism. A population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chalana M Sol; Susana Santos; Liesbeth Duijts; Alexandros G Asimakopoulos; Maria-Pilar Martinez-Moral; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  Are Clinicians Aggressive Enough in Treating Diabetes-Related Hyperlipidemia in Youth?

Authors:  Sarah Jackson; Ana Creo; Seema Kumar
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  High Insulin in Early Childhood Is Associated with Subsequent Asthma Risk Independent of Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Tara F Carr; Raquel Granell; Debra A Stern; Stefano Guerra; Anne Wright; Marilyn Halonen; John Henderson; Fernando D Martinez
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2021-10-14

5.  A single, high-fat meal adversely affects postprandial endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juanita J Fewkes; Nicole J Kellow; Stephanie F Cowan; Gary Williamson; Aimee L Dordevic
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 8.472

6.  Foetal tobacco and cannabis exposure, body fat and cardio-metabolic health in childhood.

Authors:  Kim N Cajachagua-Torres; Hanan El Marroun; Irwin K M Reiss; Susana Santos; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.910

7.  Nonfasting Lipid Profile May Suffice to Manage Dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Andrade
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2020-04-25

8.  Lipid profile of regular kratom (Mitragyna speciosa Korth.) users in the community setting.

Authors:  Mohammad Farris Iman Leong Bin Abdullah; Kok Leng Tan; Salbiah Mohd Isa; Nur Sabrina Yusoff; Nelson Jeng Yeou Chear; Darshan Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Abnormal fatty acid metabolism is a core component of spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Deguise; Giovanni Baranello; Chiara Mastella; Ariane Beauvais; Jean Michaud; Alessandro Leone; Ramona De Amicis; Alberto Battezzati; Christopher Dunham; Kathryn Selby; Jodi Warman Chardon; Hugh J McMillan; Yu-Ting Huang; Natalie L Courtney; Alannah J Mole; Sabrina Kubinski; Peter Claus; Lyndsay M Murray; Melissa Bowerman; Thomas H Gillingwater; Simona Bertoli; Simon H Parson; Rashmi Kothary
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.511

10.  Fasting blood triglycerides vary with circadian phase in both young and older people.

Authors:  Robin K Yuan; Kirsi-Marja Zitting; Wei Wang; Orfeu M Buxton; Jonathan S Williams; Jeanne F Duffy; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.