| Literature DB >> 30522507 |
Ashutosh K Pathak1, Justine C Shiau2, Matthew B Thomas3, Courtney C Murdock2,4,5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The malaria Eradication Research Agenda (malERA) has identified human-to-mosquito transmission of Plasmodium falciparum as a major target for eradication. The cornerstone for identifying and evaluating transmission in the laboratory is standard membrane feeding assays (SMFAs) where mature gametocytes of P. falciparum generated in vitro are offered to mosquitoes as part of a blood-meal. However, propagation of "infectious" gametocytes requires 10-12 days with considerable physico-chemical demands imposed on host RBCs and thus, "fresh" RBCs that are ≤ 1-week old post-collection are generally recommended. However, in addition to the costs, physico-chemical characteristics unique to RBC donors may confound reproducibility and interpretation of SMFAs. Cryogenic storage of RBCs ("cryo-preserved RBCs") is accepted by European and US FDAs as an alternative to refrigeration (4 °C) for preserving RBC "quality" and while cryo-preserved RBCs have been used for in vitro cultures of other Plasmodia and the asexual stages of P. falciparum, none of the studies required RBCs to support parasite development for > 4 days.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles stephensi; Cryogenic preservation; Gametogenesis; Malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; RBCs; SMFAs; Transmission
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30522507 PMCID: PMC6282341 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2612-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1a Overall rates of mature gametocytaemia of Plasmodium falciparum NF54 cultured in vitro in refrigerated (closed circles) or cryo-preserved (closed triangles) RBCs and b rates of gametocytaemia in RBCs cryo-preserved within 3–4 days of collection from each donor and thawed after 1 (closed squares), 4 (closed circles), 8 (closed triangles) and 12 weeks (closed diamonds) of storage. Data represents mean ± standard errors (se). See Additional file 3a for detailed trends separated by flask, RBC donor as well as experimental block
Outputs of the statistical models
| Dependent variable → | Gametocytemia in vitro (male + female stage V) | Oocyst prevalence in mosquito midguts | Sporozoite prevalence in salivary glands | Oocyst abundance (infected and uninfected midguts) | Oocyst intensity (infected midguts only) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary statistics → | OR | Std. error | p-value | OR | Std. error | p-value | OR | Std. error | p-value | IRR | Std. error | p-value | IRR | Std. error | p-value |
| Fixed effects | |||||||||||||||
| (Intercept) | 0.00 | 0.00 | < 0.001 | 1.09 | 0.52 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.96 | 0.85 | 0.43 | 5.19 | 0.48 | < 0.001 |
| 4 °C RBCs vs Cryo-RBCs | 1.31 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 1.05 | 0.38 | 0.89 | 1.35 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 1.20 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 1.12 | 0.36 | 0.75 |
| Duration of storage | 1.01 | 0.04 | 0.72 | 0.89 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.86 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.95 | 0.07 | 0.48 |
| Experimental design | |||||||||||||||
| Total flasks/mosquito infections (SMFAs), nested within experimental block | 11 | 11 | 10a | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||
| Total number of experimental blocks | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Total no. of RBC donors tested | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Total number of observations | 51 | 283 | 235 | 283 | 157 | ||||||||||
| Random effects | |||||||||||||||
| Group structure and variance for random effects | |||||||||||||||
| Flasks/SMFAs nested within experimental block | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.10 | ||||||||||
| Experimental block | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 0.40 | ||||||||||
| RBC donor | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.46 | 0.21 | ||||||||||
| Overdispersion tests | |||||||||||||||
| Dispersion ratio | 0.98 | 1.23 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.07 | ||||||||||
| p-value | 0.50 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 0.27 | ||||||||||
| Notes | |||||||||||||||
| GLMM family (link) | Binomial (logit) | Binomial (logit) | Binomial (logit) | Negative binomial (log) | Negative binomial (log) | ||||||||||
IRR Incidence rate ratios, NA not applicable, OR odds ratios
aNo of infections is lower as sporozoite prevalence was not available from 1 infection
Fig. 2a Overall prevalence of oocysts and sporozoites in midguts (left panel) and salivary glands (right panel) of Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes infected with mature gametocytes of Plasmodium falciparum NF54 from flasks depicted in Fig. 1. Data represents mean ± se. b Prevalence of oocysts and sporozoites from parasites cultured in RBCs collected from four independent donors (indicated by colours) stored for 1-week as refrigerated (“4 °C”, circles) or cryo-preserved (“Cryo”, triangles). NA = not available because sporozoite prevalence for donor 1 was zero due to low corresponding oocyst prevalence at the preceding midgut stages (6%, closed black triangle in b, left panel). Horizontal bars represent group means. See Additional file 3b for prevalence separated by RBC donor and experimental block
Fig. 3a Oocyst abundance (oocyst counts from all midguts regardless of infection status) and b intensity (oocyst counts from infected midguts only) in mosquitoes depicted in Fig. 2 (left, top and bottom panels). Parasites were cultured in RBCs collected from 4 independent donors (indicated by colours) stored for 1 week as refrigerated (“4 °C”, circles) or cryo-preserved (“Cryo”, triangles). Horizontal bars represent group means with each data point representing oocyst counts from an individual mosquito midgut. For visualization purposes, counts were jittered horizontally to 40% but not vertically to maintain alignment with the gradient on the y-axis