| Literature DB >> 31803169 |
Ashutosh K Pathak1,2,3, Justine C Shiau1, Matthew B Thomas4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,3,5,6,7.
Abstract
The relationship between Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte density and infections in mosquitoes is central to understanding the rates of transmission with important implications for control. Here, we determined whether field relevant variation in environmental temperature could also modulate this relationship. Anopheles stephensi were challenged with three densities of P. falciparum gametocytes spanning a ~10-fold gradient, and housed under diurnal/daily temperature range ("DTR") of 9°C (+5°C and -4°C) around means of 20, 24, and 28°C. Vector competence was quantified as the proportion of mosquitoes infected with oocysts in the midguts (oocyst rates) or infectious with sporozoites in the salivary glands (sporozoite rates) at peak periods of infection for each temperature to account for the differences in development rates. In addition, oocyst intensities were also recorded from infected midguts and the overall study replicated across three separate parasite cultures and mosquito cohorts. While vector competence was similar at 20 DTR 9°C and 24 DTR 9°C, oocyst and sporozoite rates were also comparable, with evidence, surprisingly, for higher vector competence in mosquitoes challenged with intermediate gametocyte densities. For the same gametocyte densities however, severe reductions in the sporozoite rates was accompanied by a significant decline in overall vector competence at 28 DTR 9°C, with gametocyte density per se showing a positive and linear effect at this temperature. Unlike vector competence, oocyst intensities decreased with increasing temperatures with a predominantly positive and linear association with gametocyte density, especially at 28 DTR 9°C. Oocyst intensities across individual infected midguts suggested temperature-specific differences in mosquito susceptibility/resistance: at 20 DTR 9°C and 24 DTR 9°C, dispersion (aggregation) increased in a density-dependent manner but not at 28 DTR 9°C where the distributions were consistently random. Limitations notwithstanding, our results suggest that variation in temperature could modify seasonal dynamics of infectious reservoirs with implications for the design and deployment of transmission-blocking vaccines/drugs.Entities:
Keywords: diurnal temperature range; gametocytemia; human infectious reservoir; malaria transmission; oocysts; parasite aggregation; sporozoites; vector competence
Year: 2019 PMID: 31803169 PMCID: PMC6873802 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1The study design showing gametocyte densities, temperature regimes, and time of sampling for each temperature, to account for the differences in development rates.
Figure 2Oocyst rates in midguts (A) and sporozoite rates in salivary glands (B) at the three temperature regimes. Values represents mean ± standard error (se) of prevalence in percent units from three biological replicates.
Statistical models for prevalence of oocysts and sporozoites in midguts and salivary glands respectively.
| (Intercept) | 1.065 | 0.281 | 3.785 | |
| 24 DTR 9°C | −0.359 | 0.309 | −1.162 | 0.245 |
| 28 DTR 9°C | −1.505 | 0.328 | −4.590 | |
| Sporozoite prevalence (vs. oocyst prevalence) | 0.148 | 0.332 | 0.447 | 0.655 |
| Gametocyte density (linear trend) | 2.116 | 1.383 | 1.530 | 0.126 |
| Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | −3.720 | 1.450 | −2.566 | |
| 24 DTR 9°C * sporozoite prevalence (vs. oocyst prevalence) | −0.160 | 0.430 | −0.372 | 0.710 |
| 28 DTR 9°C * sporozoite prevalence (vs. oocyst prevalence) | −2.446 | 0.561 | −4.362 | |
| 24 DTR 9°C * Gametocyte density (linear trend) | −1.022 | 1.854 | −0.551 | 0.582 |
| 28 DTR 9°C * Gametocyte density (linear trend) | 4.099 | 2.056 | 1.993 | |
| 24 DTR 9°C * Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | 0.256 | 1.963 | 0.130 | 0.896 |
| 28 DTR 9°C * Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | −0.047 | 2.114 | −0.022 | 0.982 |
| Sporozoite prevalence * Gametocyte density (linear trend) | 0.654 | 2.270 | 0.288 | 0.773 |
| Sporozoite prevalence * Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | 3.396 | 2.173 | 1.563 | 0.118 |
| 24 DTR 9°C * sporozoite prevalence * Gametocyte density (linear trend) | 0.054 | 2.983 | 0.018 | 0.986 |
| 28 DTR 9°C * sporozoite prevalence * Gametocyte density (linear trend) | −0.723 | 3.878 | −0.186 | 0.852 |
| 24 DTR 9°C * sporozoite prevalence * Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | 0.451 | 2.921 | 0.154 | 0.877 |
| 28 DTR 9°C * sporozoite prevalence * Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | −3.374 | 3.954 | −0.853 | 0.394 |
| Random variation in intercepts between temperatures nested within each biological replicate | 0.03 | |||
| Random variation in intercepts between the three biological replicates | 0.08 | |||
| Number of observations (i.e., mosquitoes sampled) | 1469 | |||
| Marginal | 0.427/0.446 | |||
For one biological replicate, sporozoite prevalence data for all three densities at 20 DTR 9°C and lowest density at 24 DTR 9°C was not available. Bolded values indicate statistically clear effects based on p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of gametocyte density and temperature on oocyst rates in midguts (A) and sporozoite rates in the salivary glands (B). Values represents means ± standard error (se) from three biological replicates. The color scheme is continued from Figure 2 with blue representing 20 DTR 9°C, green representing 24 DTR 9°C and red/vermillion indicating 28 DTR 9°C.
Figure 4Oocyst intensities (midguts with oocysts ≥1, i.e., infected midguts) across temperatures (A) and gametocyte density (B). Values represents means ± standard error (se) from three biological replicates.
Statistical models for oocyst intensity (infected midguts).
| (Intercept) | 2.112 | 0.143 | 14.772 | |
| 24 DTR 9°C | −0.580 | 0.168 | −3.449 | |
| 28 DTR 9°C | −1.386 | 0.185 | −7.481 | |
| Gametocyte density (linear trend) | 12.513 | 1.078 | 11.612 | |
| Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | −3.234 | 1.072 | −3.016 | |
| 24 DTR 9°C/Gametocyte density (linear trend) | −2.271 | 1.634 | −1.390 | 0.165 |
| 28 DTR 9°C/Gametocyte density (linear trend) | −6.434 | 2.342 | −2.747 | |
| 24 DTR 9°C/Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | −2.749 | 1.624 | −1.692 | 0.091 |
| 28 DTR 9°C/Gametocyte density (quadratic/“hump-shaped” trend) | −0.565 | 2.558 | −0.221 | 0.825 |
| Random variation in intercepts between temperatures within each replicate | 0.03 | |||
| Random variation in intercepts between replicates | 0.1 | |||
| Observations | 504 | |||
| Marginal | 0.522/0.579 | |||
| GLMM family (“link”) | Negative binomial with variance increasing quadratically with the mean [glmmTMB family = nbinom2 (link = “log”)] | |||
Bolded values indicate statistically clear effects based on p < 0.05.
Figure 5Effect of temperature (A) and gametocyte density (B) on the distribution of oocyst burdens across individual (infected) midguts at the three temperatures using the Variance to Mean Ratios (VMR) as the measure of dispersion (s2: m). Values represents means ± standard error (se) of the VMR from three biological replicates.