Literature DB >> 30521025

Gestational Age at Arrest of Development: An Alternative Approach for Assigning Time at Risk in Studies of Time-Varying Exposures and Miscarriage.

Alexandra C Sundermann1,2, Sudeshna Mukherjee1, Pingsheng Wu3, Digna R Velez Edwards1,2,4, Katherine E Hartmann1,2.   

Abstract

The time between arrest of pregnancy development and miscarriage represents a window in which the pregnancy is nonviable and not developing. In effect, the pregnancy loss has already occurred, and additional exposure cannot influence its outcome. However, epidemiologic studies of miscarriage traditionally use gestational age at miscarriage (GAM) to assign time in survival analyses, which overestimates duration of exposure and time at risk. In Right From the Start, a pregnancy cohort study (2000-2012), we characterized the gap between estimated gestational age at arrest of development (GAAD) and miscarriage using transvaginal ultrasound in 500 women recruited from 3 states (North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas). We compared effect estimates from models using GAAD with GAM to assign time at risk through a simulation study of several exposure patterns with varying effect sizes. The median gap between GAAD and miscarriage was 23 days (interquartile range, 15-32). Use of GAAD decreased the bias and variance of the estimated association for time-varying exposures, whereas half the time using GAM led to estimates that differed from the true effect by more than 20%. Using GAAD to assign time at risk should result in more accurate and consistent characterization of miscarriage risk associated with time-varying exposures.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias (epidemiology); measurement error; miscarriage; pregnancy; reproductive epidemiology; simulation study; spontaneous abortion

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30521025      PMCID: PMC6395168          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  24 in total

1.  Significance of cardiac activity on endovaginal ultrasound in very early embryos.

Authors:  S R Goldstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Reducing misclassification in assignment of timing of events during pregnancy.

Authors:  Juan Yang; Katherine E Hartmann; Amy H Herring; David A Savitz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; Y P Shah; D J Kanon; J V Lindsey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The ultrasonic measurement of fetal crown-rump length as a method of assessing gestational age.

Authors:  J E Drumm; J Clinch; G MacKenzie
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1976-06

Review 5.  Early pregnancy failure--current management concepts.

Authors:  M D Creinin; J L Schwartz; R S Guido; H C Pymar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 6.  Accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound in the diagnosis of early embryonic demise: a systematic review.

Authors:  Y Jeve; R Rana; A Bhide; S Thangaratinam
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Embryonic heart rates: development in early first trimester and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  N Tezuka; S Sato; H Kanasugi; M Hiroi
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Expectant management of spontaneous first-trimester miscarriage: prospective validation of the '2-week rule'.

Authors:  I Casikar; T Bignardi; J Riemke; D Alhamdan; G Condous
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Endovaginal ultrasonographic measurement of early embryonic size as a means of assessing gestational age.

Authors:  S R Goldstein; R Wolfson
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester.

Authors:  Caroline S Hoffman; Lynne C Messer; Pauline Mendola; David A Savitz; Amy H Herring; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.980

View more
  1 in total

1.  Week-by-week alcohol consumption in early pregnancy and spontaneous abortion risk: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Digna R Velez Edwards; James C Slaughter; Pingsheng Wu; Sarah H Jones; Eric S Torstenson; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 8.661

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.