Literature DB >> 19000297

Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester.

Caroline S Hoffman1, Lynne C Messer, Pauline Mendola, David A Savitz, Amy H Herring, Katherine E Hartmann.   

Abstract

Reported last menstrual period (LMP) is commonly used to estimate gestational age (GA) but may be unreliable. Ultrasound in the first trimester is generally considered a highly accurate method of pregnancy dating. The authors compared first trimester report of LMP and first trimester ultrasound for estimating GA at birth and examined whether disagreement between estimates varied by maternal and infant characteristics. Analyses included 1867 singleton livebirths to women enrolled in a prospective pregnancy cohort. The authors computed the difference between LMP and ultrasound GA estimates (GA difference) and examined the proportion of births within categories of GA difference stratified by maternal and infant characteristics. The proportion of births classified as preterm, term and post-term by pregnancy dating methods was also examined. LMP-based estimates were 0.8 days (standard deviation = 8.0, median = 0) longer on average than ultrasound estimates. LMP classified more births as post-term than ultrasound (4.0% vs. 0.7%). GA difference was greater among young women, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women, women of non-optimal body weight and mothers of low-birthweight infants. Results indicate first trimester report of LMP reasonably approximates gestational age obtained from first trimester ultrasound, but the degree of discrepancy between estimates varies by important maternal characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000297     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00965.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  61 in total

1.  Patterns and predictors of vaginal bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Reem Hasan; Donna D Baird; Amy H Herring; Andrew F Olshan; Michele L Jonsson Funk; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Validity of maternal birthweight recall among Colombian children.

Authors:  Caroline E Boeke; Constanza Marín; Henry Oliveros; Mercedes Mora-Plazas; Samantha Agudelo-Cañas; Eduardo Villamor
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

3.  Neonatal DNA methylation patterns associate with gestational age.

Authors:  James W Schroeder; Karen N Conneely; Joseph C Cubells; Varun Kilaru; D Jeffrey Newport; Bettina T Knight; Zachary N Stowe; Patricia A Brennan; Julia Krushkal; Frances A Tylavsky; Robert N Taylor; Ronald M Adkins; Alicia K Smith
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.528

4.  Perinatal outcomes for Asian, Native Hawaiian, and other Pacific Islander mothers of single and multiple race/ethnicity: California and Hawaii, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Ashley H Schempf; Pauline Mendola; Brady E Hamilton; Donald K Hayes; Diane M Makuc
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Alonzo T Folger; Elizabeth A Kelly; Beena Devi Kamath-Rayne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

6.  Prenatal exposure to PM2.5 and birth weight: A pooled analysis from three North American longitudinal pregnancy cohort studies.

Authors:  Maria José Rosa; Ashley Pajak; Allan C Just; Perry E Sheffield; Itai Kloog; Joel Schwartz; Brent Coull; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Andrea A Baccarelli; Kathi Huddleston; John E Niederhuber; Martha María Téllez Rojo; Robert O Wright; Chris Gennings; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Gestational Age at Arrest of Development: An Alternative Approach for Assigning Time at Risk in Studies of Time-Varying Exposures and Miscarriage.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Sudeshna Mukherjee; Pingsheng Wu; Digna R Velez Edwards; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Comparison of gestational dating methods and implications for exposure-outcome associations: an example with PM2.5 and preterm birth.

Authors:  Kristen M Rappazzo; Danelle T Lobdell; Lynne C Messer; Charles Poole; Julie L Daniels
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  The role of parental and perinatal characteristics on Langerhans cell histiocytosis: characterizing increased risk among Hispanics.

Authors:  Erin C Peckham-Gregory; Kenneth L McClain; Carl E Allen; Michael E Scheurer; Philip J Lupo
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Prenatal and postnatal stress and asthma in children: Temporal- and sex-specific associations.

Authors:  Alison Lee; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Maria José Rosa; Calvin Jara; Robert O Wright; Brent A Coull; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.