Literature DB >> 15613955

Reducing misclassification in assignment of timing of events during pregnancy.

Juan Yang1, Katherine E Hartmann, Amy H Herring, David A Savitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perinatal epidemiology studies often collect only the calendar month in which an event occurs in early pregnancy because it is difficult for women to recall a specific day when queried later in pregnancy or postpartum. Lack of day information may result in incorrect assignment of completed gestational month because calendar months and pregnancy months are not aligned.
METHODS: To examine the direction and magnitude of misclassification, we compared 3 methods for assignment of completed gestational month: 1) calendar month difference, 2) conditional month difference, and 3) imputed month midpoint. We used data from the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition Study for simulations.
RESULTS: Calendar month difference misclassified 54% of events as 1 month later in pregnancy compared with the actual completed month of gestation. Each of the other 2 methods misclassified approximately 12% of events to 1 month earlier and 12% to 1 month later.
CONCLUSIONS: Calendar month difference, a common method, has the greatest misclassification. Conditional month difference and imputed month midpoint, which require little effort to implement, are superior to calendar month difference for reducing misclassification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15613955     DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147120.50700.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  4 in total

1.  Gestational Age at Arrest of Development: An Alternative Approach for Assigning Time at Risk in Studies of Time-Varying Exposures and Miscarriage.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Sudeshna Mukherjee; Pingsheng Wu; Digna R Velez Edwards; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  First-trimester bleeding characteristics associate with increased risk of preterm birth: data from a prospective pregnancy cohort.

Authors:  D R Velez Edwards; D D Baird; R Hasan; D A Savitz; K E Hartmann
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Are black and Hispanic infants with specific congenital heart defects at increased risk of preterm birth?

Authors:  Wendy N Nembhard; Jason L Salemi; Melissa L Loscalzo; Tao Wang; Kimberlea W Hauser
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Late pregnancy exposures to disinfection by-products and growth-related birth outcomes.

Authors:  Alison F Hinckley; Annette M Bachand; John S Reif
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.