Literature DB >> 30518809

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.

Chrisa Dimou1,2, Christina Antza1, Evangelos Akrivos2,3, Ioannis Doundoulakis1,2, Stella Stabouli4, Anna Bettina Haidich5, Vasilios Kotsis6.   

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are drugs commonly used for the treatment of hypertension. However, studies on their comparative efficacy have not been extensively investigated. The current systematic review and network meta-analysis studied the comparative efficacy of the two antihypertensive treatment categories in reducing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension patients. A literature search was carried out in Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trials, which had reported blood pressure effects, mortality, and/or morbidity. Blood pressure results were found in 30 studies with 7370 participants and 8 studies with 25,158 participants with mortality/morbidity results included in the analysis. The two drug classes had similar effectiveness in lowering systolic (weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.59, 95% CI: -0.21 to 1.38) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 0.62, 95% CI: -0.06 to 1.30), all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR)): 0.96, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.14), fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37) and stroke (RR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.46). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more helpful in the prevention and/or the hospitalization for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers (RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers were similarly effective in decreasing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more protective in the advancement and/or hospitalization of the hypertensive patient for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30518809     DOI: 10.1038/s41371-018-0138-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  48 in total

Review 1.  Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Comparative Efficacy of Angiotensin II Antagonists in Essential Hypertension: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Bernice Tsoi; Leo E Akioyamen; Ashley Bonner; Claudia Frankfurter; Mitchell Levine; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Ron Goeree; Daria O'Reilly
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.975

3.  ACE-inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for prevention of events in cardiovascular patients without heart failure - A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Ricci; Augusto Di Castelnuovo; Gianluigi Savarese; Pasquale Perrone Filardi; Raffaele De Caterina
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Dias; N J Welton; D M Caldwell; A E Ades
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension.

Authors:  David B Matchar; Douglas C McCrory; Lori A Orlando; Manesh R Patel; Uptal D Patel; Meenal B Patwardhan; Benjamin Powers; Gregory P Samsa; Rebecca N Gray
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Telmisartan versus angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Z Zou; G-L Xi; H-B Yuan; Q-F Zhu; X-Y Shi
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 7.  Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker therapy to reduce cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: part 2.

Authors:  William J Bommer
Journal:  Prev Cardiol       Date:  2008

8.  The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Georgia Salanti; Deborah M Caldwell; Anna Chaimani; Christopher H Schmid; Chris Cameron; John P A Ioannidis; Sharon Straus; Kristian Thorlund; Jeroen P Jansen; Cynthia Mulrow; Ferrán Catalá-López; Peter C Gøtzsche; Kay Dickersin; Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18

10.  Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods.

Authors:  Gerta Rücker; Guido Schwarzer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  6 in total

1.  Continuing versus suspending angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: Impact on adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Authors:  Renato D Lopes; Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli Macedo; Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva; Renata Junqueira Moll-Bernardes; Andre Feldman; Guilherme D'Andréa Saba Arruda; Andrea Silvestre de Souza; Denilson Campos de Albuquerque; Lilian Mazza; Mayara Fraga Santos; Natalia Zerbinatti Salvador; C Michael Gibson; Christopher B Granger; John H Alexander; Olga Ferreira de Souza
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  In vitro and in vivo identification of clinically approved drugs that modify ACE2 expression.

Authors:  Sanju Sinha; Kuoyuan Cheng; Alejandro A Schäffer; Kenneth Aldape; Eytan Ruppin; Eyal Schiff
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 11.429

3.  Individual interventions to improve adherence to pharmaceutical treatment, diet and physical activity among adults with primary hypertension. A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Dora Inés Parra; Isabel Trapero Gimeno; Javier Mauricio Sánchez Rodríguez; Lizeth Catherine Rodríguez Corredor; Juliana Alexandra Hernández Vargas; Luis Alberto López Romero; Fernando J García López; Cristina Escudero-Gómez; Silvia Juliana Trujillo-Cáceres; Pilar Serrano-Gallardo; Lina M Vera-Cala
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Effect of Fimasartan versus Valsartan and Olmesartan on Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Korean Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Three-Parallel Group, Forced Titration, Multicenter, Phase IV Study (Fimasartan Achieving Systolic Blood Pressure Target (FAST) Study).

Authors:  Woo-Baek Chung; Sang-Hyun Ihm; Sung-Won Jang; Sung-Ho Her; Chul Soo Park; Jong-Min Lee; Kiyuk Chang; Doo-Soo Jeon; Ki-Dong Yoo; Ki-Bae Seung
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Protective Role of Enalapril in Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yili Zhang; Junjie Liu; Yuan Li; Nannan Tan; Kangjia Du; Huihui Zhao; Juan Wang; Jian Zhang; Wei Wang; Yong Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  The Number of Pills, Rather Than the Type of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitor, Predicts Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control in Essential Hypertensives on Triple Therapy: A Real-Life Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Riccardo Sarzani; Federico Giulietti; Andrea Filipponi; Sonia Marziali; Letizia Ristori; Silvia Buscarini; Caterina Garbuglia; Simone Biondini; Massimiliano Allevi; Francesco Spannella
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.845

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.