Literature DB >> 28807582

Comparative Efficacy of Angiotensin II Antagonists in Essential Hypertension: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Bernice Tsoi1, Leo E Akioyamen2, Ashley Bonner3, Claudia Frankfurter4, Mitchell Levine1, Eleanor Pullenayegum5, Ron Goeree1, Daria O'Reilly1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the long-term clinical benefits of individual members of angiotensin II receptor blockers is limited given the lack of head-to-head studies. We conducted a network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of different members within this drug class with respect to outcomes of (i) blood pressure reduction (at 24 and 52 weeks) and (ii) prevention of cardiovascular disease (>104 weeks).
METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted - Protocol registration: (PROSPERO - CRD42014007067) - to identify relevant literature from the following databases: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline and EMBASE; searched from inception to July 2016. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they reported long-term effectiveness relating to blood pressure, mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke. Eligible studies included those with placebo or specific active-treatment comparators (either another angiotensin II receptor blockers or hydrochlorothiazide). A Bayesian random-effects network model was used to combine direct within-trial comparisons between treatment groups with indirect evidence from other trials.
RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were identified, representing 28 unique trials. Blood pressure reduction, based on 12 studies (n=807) with fixed dosing regimen, was found to be similar amongst members of the angiotensin receptor blocker drug class at both 24 and 52 weeks. A network meta-analysis of five studies (n=16,716) with a treat-to-target approach found that prevention of all-cause mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction was similar across the angiotensin-receptor blockers therapies initiated.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is insufficient to show differences in any members within the angiotensin II receptor blocker drug class with respect to blood pressuring lowering effects or a reduction in cardiovascular diseases.
Copyright © 2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers; Blood pressure; Meta-analysis; Myocardial infarction; Stroke; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28807582     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  7 in total

1.  A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.

Authors:  Chrisa Dimou; Christina Antza; Evangelos Akrivos; Ioannis Doundoulakis; Stella Stabouli; Anna Bettina Haidich; Vasilios Kotsis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Differential effects of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers on reducing intraocular pressure and TGFβ signaling in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Ralph J Hazlewood; Qingxia Chen; Frances K Clark; John Kuchtey; Rachel W Kuchtey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparative efficacy and safety of fimasartan in patients with hypertension: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Suk Min Seo; Sang Hyun Ihm; Jeong-Eun Yi; Seung Hee Jeong; Bong-Seog Kim
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Effect of Fimasartan versus Valsartan and Olmesartan on Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Korean Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Three-Parallel Group, Forced Titration, Multicenter, Phase IV Study (Fimasartan Achieving Systolic Blood Pressure Target (FAST) Study).

Authors:  Woo-Baek Chung; Sang-Hyun Ihm; Sung-Won Jang; Sung-Ho Her; Chul Soo Park; Jong-Min Lee; Kiyuk Chang; Doo-Soo Jeon; Ki-Dong Yoo; Ki-Bae Seung
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 5.  Management of arterial hypertension with angiotensin receptor blockers: Current evidence and the role of olmesartan.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 6.  Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension and the Role of Olmesartan.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.

Authors:  Hiromi Rakugi; Kazuomi Kario; Masako Yamaguchi; Takayoshi Sasajima; Hiromi Gotou; Jack Zhang
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.528

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.