Literature DB >> 30518566

Community dynamics and sensitivity to model structure: towards a probabilistic view of process-based model predictions.

Clement Aldebert1, Daniel B Stouffer2.   

Abstract

Statistical inference and mechanistic, process-based modelling represent two philosophically different streams of research whose primary goal is to make predictions. Here, we merge elements from both approaches to keep the theoretical power of process-based models while also considering their predictive uncertainty using Bayesian statistics. In environmental and biological sciences, the predictive uncertainty of process-based models is usually reduced to parametric uncertainty. Here, we propose a practical approach to tackle the added issue of structural sensitivity, the sensitivity of predictions to the choice between quantitatively close and biologically plausible models. In contrast to earlier studies that presented alternative predictions based on alternative models, we propose a probabilistic view of these predictions that include the uncertainty in model construction and the parametric uncertainty of each model. As a proof of concept, we apply this approach to a predator-prey system described by the classical Rosenzweig-MacArthur model, and we observe that parametric sensitivity is regularly overcome by structural sensitivity. In addition to tackling theoretical questions about model sensitivity, the proposed approach can also be extended to make probabilistic predictions based on more complex models in an operational context. Both perspectives represent important steps towards providing better model predictions in biology, and beyond.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Bayesian statistics; community dynamics; model predictions; predation; structural sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30518566      PMCID: PMC6303789          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  14 in total

1.  How far details are important in ecosystem modelling: the case of multi-limiting nutrients in phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions.

Authors:  J-C Poggiale; M Baklouti; B Queguiner; S A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure.

Authors:  Gregor F Fussmann; Bernd Blasius
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Topological sensitivity analysis for systems biology.

Authors:  Ann C Babtie; Paul Kirk; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ecosystem function in predator-prey food webs-confronting dynamic models with empirical data.

Authors:  Alva Curtsdotter; H Thomas Banks; John E Banks; Mattias Jonsson; Tomas Jonsson; Amanda N Laubmeier; Michael Traugott; Riccardo Bommarco
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Defining and detecting structural sensitivity in biological models: developing a new framework.

Authors:  M W Adamson; A Yu Morozov
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Bifurcation analysis of models with uncertain function specification: how should we proceed?

Authors:  M W Adamson; A Yu Morozov
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time.

Authors:  M L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Sensitivity of the dynamics of the general Rosenzweig-MacArthur model to the mathematical form of the functional response: a bifurcation theory approach.

Authors:  Gunog Seo; Gail S K Wolkowicz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 9.  Mechanistic models versus machine learning, a fight worth fighting for the biological community?

Authors:  Ruth E Baker; Jose-Maria Peña; Jayaratnam Jayamohan; Antoine Jérusalem
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  The ecological forecast horizon, and examples of its uses and determinants.

Authors:  Owen L Petchey; Mikael Pontarp; Thomas M Massie; Sonia Kéfi; Arpat Ozgul; Maja Weilenmann; Gian Marco Palamara; Florian Altermatt; Blake Matthews; Jonathan M Levine; Dylan Z Childs; Brian J McGill; Michael E Schaepman; Bernhard Schmid; Piet Spaak; Andrew P Beckerman; Frank Pennekamp; Ian S Pearse
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  1 in total

1.  Emerging Frontiers in the Study of Molecular Evolution.

Authors:  David A Liberles; Belinda Chang; Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Aaron Goldman; Jody Hey; Betül Kaçar; Michelle Meyer; William Murphy; David Posada; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.395

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.