| Literature DB >> 30518330 |
Jing-Hua Li1, Ning Zhu1, Ying-Bin Min1, Xiang-Zhou Shi1, Yun-You Duan1, Yi-Lin Yang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the relationship between liver stiffness and carotid artery elasticity in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. We used an acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technique to measure stiffness, and a radio frequency (RF) vascular quantitative ultrasound technique to measure changes in common carotid artery elasticity and vascular function.Entities:
Keywords: Carotid artery elasticity; HBV; HCV; Ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30518330 PMCID: PMC6280487 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0910-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1ARFI liver stiffness images and common carotid artery RF ultrasound images in patients with CHB: a Use of the ARFI technique to measure liver stiffness in patients with CHB using a conventional ultrasound interface. b Use of QIMT and QAS techniques to quantify the carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and vascular elasticity in patients with CHB
General clinical data of all study participants
| Control Group | Patients with chronic viral hepatitis | F |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with CHB | Patients with CHC | ||||
| Age, Years | 45.8 ± 10.6 | 46.5 ± 12.2 | 47.6 ± 12.1 | 0.400 | 0.670 |
| Men Percentage, Count (%) | 43(67) | 98(67) | 47(67) | – | – |
| Systolic pressure, mmHg | 115.7 ± 11.6 | 116.2 ± 13.1 | 119.7 ± 12.8 | 2.166 | 0.177 |
| Diastolic, pressure mmHg | 71.2 ± 8.7 | 73.2 ± 8.6 | 71.2 ± 8.6 | 1.872 | 0.156 |
| Blood Glu, mmol/L | 4.9 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 1.1 | 6.0 ± 1.7 | 15.933 | < 0.001 |
| Glycated haemoglobin, % | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 5.5 ± 1.4 | 6.8 ± 1.6 | 30.804 | < 0.001 |
| BMI, Kg/m2 | 23.2 ± 2.6 | 23.5 ± 3.0 | 24.4 ± 3.4 | 2.936 | 0.055 |
| Cholesterol, mmol/L | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 3.8 ± 1.3 | 3.7 ± 1.1 | 0.373 | 0.689 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 0.185 | 0.831 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 0.695 | 0.500 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 3.115 | 0.046* |
| Platelets, 109 /L | 187.6 ± 70.2 | 137.4 ± 77.8 | 138.3 ± 64.3 | 11.598 | < 0.001 |
| AST, U/L | 23.8 ± 8.7 | 45.8 ± 34.2 | 37.7 ± 24.6 | 13.927 | < 0.001 |
| ALT, U/L | 28.5 ± 13.8 | 46.1 ± 38.5 | 43.1 ± 40.4 | 5.765 | 0.004 |
| Albumin, g/L | 43.8 ± 7.4 | 40.9 ± 8.9 | 40.8 ± 8.2 | 3.104 | 0.046* |
| Globulin, g/L | 24.2 ± 6.3 | 25.3 ± 7.2 | 24.9 ± 7.1 | 0.566 | 0.569 |
Note: CHB chronic hepatitis B, CHC chronic hepatitis C, BMI Body mass index, LDL Low-density lipoprotein, HDL High-density lipoprotein, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase. * P < 0.05 when compared to the control group
Fig. 2Comparison of liver stiffness and carotid artery IMT values among the 3 groups: a Use of the ARFI technique to measure liver stiffness in patients with CHB, CHC and control group using a conventional ultrasound interface. b Use of QIMT and QAS techniques to quantify the carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and vascular elasticity in patients among the 3 groups. Note: ARFI: acoustic radiation force impulse; IMT: intima-media thickness; CHB: chronic hepatitis B; CHC: chronic hepatitis C; ***: when compared to the control group, P < 0.001
Fig. 3Carotid elasticity parameters and comparisons among the 3 groups: a PWV values and comparisons among the 3 groups; b α values and comparisons among the 3 groups; c β values and comparisons among the 3 groups; d CC values and comparisons among the 3 groups; e DC values and comparisons among the 3 groups; f Aix values of the 3 groups. CHB: chronic hepatitis B; CHC: chronic hepatitis C; PWV: pulse wave velocity; CC: arterial wall compliance coefficient; DC: arterial wall dilation coefficient; Aix: augmentation index. Note: ***: when compared to the control group, P < 0.001
Liver stiffness and left common carotid elasticity parameters in the different age groups
| Age, Year | No. | ARFI, m/s | IMT, μm | PWV, m/s | DC, 1/kPa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | < 50 | 41 | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 478.44 ± 107.86 | 5.72 ± 0.73 | 0.035 ± 0.007 |
| ≥50 | 23 | 1.06 ± 0.13 | 633.26 ± 120.02 | 6.75 ± 0.80 | 0.026 ± 0.007 | |
|
| – | 0.127 | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | |
| CHB Group | < 50 | 86 | 1.72 ± 0.50 | 456.70 ± 87.56 | 6.26 ± 1.35 | 0.038 ± 0.062 |
| ≥50 | 61 | 2.02 ± 0.50 | 630.30 ± 112.17 | 7.32 ± 1.00 | 0.020 ± 0.007 | |
|
| – | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | 0.009* | |
| CHC Group | < 50 | 41 | 1.84 ± 0.38 | 526.63 ± 130.03 | 7.70 ± 1.57 | 0.018 ± 0.009 |
| ≥50 | 29 | 1.89 ± 0.36 | 673.17 ± 167.48 | 8.36 ± 1.09 | 0.015 ± 0.006 | |
|
| – | 0.569 | < 0.001* | 0.041* | 0.079 |
ARFI radio frequency, IMT intima-media thickness, PWV pulse wave velocity, DC arterial wall dilation coefficient
* P < 0.05 when compared to the control group
Liver stiffness and left common carotid elasticity parameters in the different age groups
| Age, Year | No. | CC, mm2/kPa | α | β | Aix,% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | < 50 | 41 | 1.376 ± 0.259 | 2.70 ± 0.54 | 5.54 ± 1.10 | 0.82 ± 5.18 |
| ≥50 | 23 | 1.137 ± 0.129 | 3.63 ± 0.81 | 7.30 ± 1.70 | 3.14 ± 4.76 | |
|
| – | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | 0.082 | |
| CHB Group | < 50 | 86 | 1.139 ± 0.420 | 3.71 ± 1.69 | 7.58 ± 3.41 | 1.55 ± 4.41 |
| ≥50 | 61 | 0.935 ± 0.291 | 4.72 ± 1.51 | 9.61 ± 2.96 | 5.25 ± 4.68 | |
|
| – | 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | |
| CHC Group | < 50 | 41 | 0.854 ± 0.423 | 5.31 ± 1.97 | 10.65 ± 3.79 | 1.75 ± 3.45 |
| ≥50 | 29 | 0.761 ± 0.303 | 6.42 ± 2.57 | 13.11 ± 5.13 | 4.84 ± 3.75 | |
|
| – | 0.317 | 0.044* | 0.024* | 0.001* |
CC arterial wall compliance coefficient, Aix augmentation index
* P < 0.05 when compared to the control group
Fig. 4a There was a relationship between IMT and age of CHB patients. b Relationship between IMT and age of CHC patients. c Relationship between IMT and blood glucose meter of CHC patients. Note: IMT: intima-media thickness; CHB: chronic hepatitis B; CHC: chronic hepatitis C