| Literature DB >> 24506844 |
Li Zhang, Ji-Kai Yin, Yun-You Duan1, Xi Liu, Lei Xu, Jia Wang, Yi-Lin Yang, Li-Jun Yuan, Tie-Sheng Cao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is one of the most common causes of cardiovascular disease as it causes arterial stiffness changes. The purpose of this study is to characterize, in vivo, carotid arterial structural and functional changes by applying radio frequency and X-strain ultrasound techniques.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24506844 PMCID: PMC3932017 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-39
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Figure 1QIMT analysis of the common carotid artery. The red line represents the radiofrequency signal tracking the leading edge of the lumen intima; the green line represents the radiofrequency signal tracking the leading edge of media adventitia interface. The IMT value and vascular diameter was calculated automatically for six cardiac cycles showed on the left side of the picture.
Figure 2QAS analysis of the common carotid artery. (A) The red line represents the radiofrequency signal tracking the leading edge of the lumen intima; the green line represents the radiofrequency signal tracking the leading edge of media adventitia interface. (B) The stiffness value was calculated automatically for six cardiac cycles.
Figure 3X-strain analysis of the common carotid artery. Longitudinal (A) and transverse (B) views were shown in the same position of the common carotid artery. The motion of the lumen intima and the adventitia were colorized as shown in the upper side of left column. The curves of different variables by X-strain analysis were traced automatically (the right column). In the pictures, we provide velocity curves analyzed by the X-strain method.
Parameters of different views of X-train analysis
| Longitudinal displacement | mm |
| Longitudinal strain | % |
| Radial strain | % |
| Longitudinal strain rate | 1/sec |
| Radial strain rate | 1/sec |
| Rotational displacement | Degree |
| Radial displacement | mm |
| Circumferential strain | % |
| Radial strain | % |
| Circumferential strain rate | 1/sec |
| Radial strain rate | 1/sec |
Clinical characteristics of the study subjects
| Gender (M/F) | 19/22 | 22/28 | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 53.05 ± 11.99 | 53.60 ± 9.29 | 0.814 |
| Height (cm) | 164.80 ± 7.49 | 16 6.06 ± 8.26 | 0.471 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.15 ± 8.10 | 70.45 ± 17.98 | 0.290 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.68 ± 2.01 | 25.49 ± 5.83 | 0.407 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.667 ± 0.1746 | 1.754 ± 0.1778 | 0.0257* |
| SBP (mmHg) | 116.11 ± 12.18 | 134.9 ± 18.81 | 0.0007* |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.84 ± 9.241 | 86.50 ± 12.09 | 0.0036* |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | / | 5.47 ± 2.37 | / |
| Smoker/duration (%/years) | 32%/8.23 ± 6.74 | 36%/9.72 ± 4.43 | 0.379 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 3.82 ± 0.31 | 4.42 ± 0.12 | <0.0001* |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.63 ± 0.13 | 1.58 ± 0.17 | 0.137 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.94 ± 0.24 | 3.12 ± 0.08 | 0.036* |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.02 ± 0.65 | 1.13 ± 0.87 | 0.236 |
| HbA1c (%) | 4.38 ± 1.43 | 7.52 ± 1.05 | <0.0001* |
| Serum creatinine (μmol/l) | 47.82 ± 12.5 | 50.31 ± 26.7 | 0.098 |
| Uric acid (μmol/l) | 221.43 ± 25.96 | 229.57 ± 23.2 | 0.569 |
Notes: Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. *Value between controls and patients with diabetes P < 0.05.
Abbreviations:BMI body mass index; BSA body surface area; SBP systolic blood pressure; DBP diastolic blood; TC total cholesterol; HDL high density lipoprotein; LDL low density lipoprotein; TG triglycerides.
Comparison between the two groups by QIMT and QAS measurements
| IMT (μm) | 626.5 ± 169.1 | 568.5 ± 122.6 | 0.1506 |
| PWV (m/s) | 8.388 ± 3.254 | 7.269 ± 1.332 | 0.0430* |
| α | 5.481 ± 7.208 | 4.987 ± 1.749 | 0.1429 |
| β | 12.51 ± 14.16 | 9.279 ± 2.871 | 0.0463* |
| CC (mm2/Kpa) | 0.802 ± 0.3094 | 0.968 ± 0.3992 | 0.0414* |
Notes: *Value between controls and patients with diabetes P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations:IMT intima-media thickness; PWV pulse wave velocity; CC compliance coefficient.
Comparison of displacement variables between the two groups by X-strain analysis
| 0.0884 ± 0.053 | 0.0638 ± 0.028 | 0.0212* | |
| 390.0 ± 163.1 | 365.1 ± 205.1 | 0.2262 | |
| 35.96 ± 27.78 | 65.14 ± 67.36 | 0.0420* | |
| 0.8188 ± 0.5993 | 0.6000 ± 0.2290 | 0.0235* | |
| 314.7 ± 87.15 | 337.3 ± 79.16 | 0.1074 | |
| 137.8 ± 49.7 | 130.8 ± 43.89 | 0.5080 | |
| 0.4981 ± 0.2225 | 0.6876 ± 0.3874 | 0.0161* | |
| 316.4 ± 79.9 | 394.3 ± 147.1 | 0.0072* | |
| 123.7 ± 59.81 | 122.2 ± 77.56 | 0.2568 |
Notes: *Value between controls and patients with diabetes P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations:RD-D radial displacement difference; RD-DT the time of radial peak displacement difference; RD-TD the time difference of radial peak displacement; LD-D longitudinal displacement difference; LD-DT the time of longitudinal peak displacement difference; LD-TD the time difference of longitudinal peak displacement; ROT-D difference of rotation displacement; ROT-DT the time of rotation peak displacement difference; ROT-TD the time difference of rotation peak displacement.
Comparison of strain variables between the two groups by X-strain analysis
| 1.936 ± 0.9507 | 1.601 ± 0.5719 | 0.1136 | |
| 359.5 ± 78.11 | 379.2 ± 138.7 | 0.7695 | |
| 65.86 ± 49.97 | 61.64 ± 36.65 | 0.9615 | |
| 22.51 ± 7.056 | 21.72 ± 7.576 | 0.5789 | |
| 341.9 ± 77.56 | 369.0 ± 78.26 | 0.0494* | |
| 132.6 ± 52.33 | 151.3 ± 72.17 | 0.2715 | |
| 3.191 ± 1.212 | 3.318 ± 1.586 | 0.6541 | |
| 276.6 ± 45.37 | 268.4 ± 62.3 | 0.3850 |
Notes: *Value between controls and patients with diabetes P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations:CS-D circumferential strain difference; CS-DT the time of circumferential peak strain difference; CS-TD the time difference of circumferential peak strain; LS-D longitudinal strain difference; LS-DT the time of longitudinal peak strain difference; LS-TD the time difference of longitudinal peak strain; RS radial strain; RS-T the time of radial peak strain.
Comparison of strain rate variables between the two groups by X-strain analysis
| 0.2433 ± 0.7987 | 0.2517 ± 0.0968 | 0.7458 | |
| 264.3 ± 115.9 | 279.7 ± 104.5 | 0.3555 | |
| 71.72 ± 78.20 | 62.17 ± 76.90 | 0.1732 | |
| 5.761 ± 4.456 | 6.099 ± 3.517 | 0.5579 | |
| 339.1 ± 147.2 | 317.6 ± 110.7 | 0.7933 | |
| 155.9 ± 71.13 | 162.0 ± 78.33 | 0.9588 | |
| 0.4126 ± 0.1615 | 1.804 ± 6.997 | 0.7827 | |
| 142.7 ± 22.43 | 136.2 ± 30.70 | 0.0474* |
Notes: *Value between controls and patients with diabetes P < 0.05.
Abbreviations:CSR-D circumferential strain rate difference; CSR-DT the time of circumferential peak strain rate difference; CS-TD the time difference of circumferential peak strain rate; LSR-D longitudinal strain rate difference; LSR-DT the time of longitudinal peak strain rate difference; LSR-TD the time difference of longitudinal peak strain rate; RSR radial strain rate; RSR-T the time of radial peak strain rate.
Figure 4Correlations of significantly different parameters in the patient group. Among them, the correlations of BSA and ROT-DT, BSA and β, BSA and PWV, CS-DT and CC, CC and RSR-T, and CC and PWV had statistical significance as shown.
Figure 5Inter-observer variability of PWV and IMT measurements. Linear regression analysis shows good agreement between measurements for PWV and IMT by two independent observers.
Figure 6Intra-observer repeatability of PWV and IMT measurements. Linear regression analysis shows good agreement between measurements for PWV and IMT by the same observer.