Johan Lönnbro1,2, Susanna M Wallerstedt3,4. 1. Department of Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 90, Gothenburg, Sweden. johan.lonnbro@gu.se. 2. Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden. johan.lonnbro@gu.se. 3. Department of Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 90, Gothenburg, Sweden. 4. HTA Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As prescribing skills are a prerequisite for rational use of medicines, and education and training are important in acquiring these skills, we aimed to explore what aspects junior physicians find important when being taught the art of prescribing. METHODS: Written feedback from 34 interns after participating in an educational session as part of a randomized controlled study at a university hospital formed the qualitative data in this study. Manifest content analysis was performed, guided by the research question "Educating junior physicians in the art of prescribing: what aspects do they find important?" Meaning units were extracted and categorized, and emergent themes were identified. RESULTS: Five themes emerged. The first, clinical relevance, was exemplified by the categories valuable for health care; perceived relevance for one's own work; and translating theory into practice while the second, applicable content, included categories such as clinical advice; practical tips on using the electronic medical record system; and tools that facilitate. The third and fourth themes, reality-based teaching and creative discussions, were exemplified by the categories patient cases and feedback; and discussion-based teaching; wide-ranging discussions and a permissive and open atmosphere, respectively. In the last theme, effective structure, we identified the categories clear structure; small group teaching; allocated time for discussion; well-organized administration; and home assignment for practice. CONCLUSION: Creative discussions, effectively structured in small group sessions, with clinically relevant, reality-based content built on case studies and feedback, are aspects which junior physicians find important when educated in the art of prescribing.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: As prescribing skills are a prerequisite for rational use of medicines, and education and training are important in acquiring these skills, we aimed to explore what aspects junior physicians find important when being taught the art of prescribing. METHODS: Written feedback from 34 interns after participating in an educational session as part of a randomized controlled study at a university hospital formed the qualitative data in this study. Manifest content analysis was performed, guided by the research question "Educating junior physicians in the art of prescribing: what aspects do they find important?" Meaning units were extracted and categorized, and emergent themes were identified. RESULTS: Five themes emerged. The first, clinical relevance, was exemplified by the categories valuable for health care; perceived relevance for one's own work; and translating theory into practice while the second, applicable content, included categories such as clinical advice; practical tips on using the electronic medical record system; and tools that facilitate. The third and fourth themes, reality-based teaching and creative discussions, were exemplified by the categories patient cases and feedback; and discussion-based teaching; wide-ranging discussions and a permissive and open atmosphere, respectively. In the last theme, effective structure, we identified the categories clear structure; small group teaching; allocated time for discussion; well-organized administration; and home assignment for practice. CONCLUSION: Creative discussions, effectively structured in small group sessions, with clinically relevant, reality-based content built on case studies and feedback, are aspects which junior physicians find important when educated in the art of prescribing.
Authors: John Q Young; Sumant R Ranji; Robert M Wachter; Connie M Lee; Brian Niehaus; Andrew D Auerbach Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rebekah L Gardner; Emily Cooper; Jacqueline Haskell; Daniel A Harris; Sara Poplau; Philip J Kroth; Mark Linzer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: M A O'Brien; S Rogers; G Jamtvedt; A D Oxman; J Odgaard-Jensen; D T Kristoffersen; L Forsetlund; D Bainbridge; N Freemantle; D A Davis; R B Haynes; E L Harvey Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2007-10-17