Literature DB >> 30516675

Hybrid 11C-MET PET/MRI Combined With "Machine Learning" in Glioma Diagnosis According to the Revised Glioma WHO Classification 2016.

Sied Kebir, Manuel Weber, Lazaros Lazaridis, Cornelius Deuschl1, Teresa Schmidt, Christoph Mönninghoff2, Kathy Keyvani3, Lale Umutlu1, Daniela Pierscianek, Michael Forsting1, Ulrich Sure, Martin Stuschke4, Christoph Kleinschnitz5, Björn Scheffler, Patrick M Colletti6, Domenico Rubello7, Christoph Rischpler, Martin Glas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the advent of the revised WHO classification from 2016, molecular features, including isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation have become important in glioma subtyping. This pilot trial analyzed the potential for C-methionine (MET) PET/MRI in classifying glioma according to the revised WHO classification using a machine learning model.
METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade II-IV glioma underwent preoperative MET-PET/MRI imaging. Patients were retrospectively divided into four groups: IDH wild-type glioblastoma (GBM), IDH wild-type grade II/III glioma (GII/III-IDHwt), IDH mutant grade II/III glioma with codeletion of 1p19q (GII/III-IDHmut1p19qcod) or without 1p19q-codeletion (GII/III-IDHmut1p19qnc). Within each group, the maximum tumor-to-brain-ratio (TBRmax) of MET-uptake was calculated. To gain generalizable implications from our data, we made use of a machine learning algorithm based on a development and validation subcohort. A support vector machine model was fit to the development subcohort and evaluated on the validation subcohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis served as metric to assess model performance.
RESULTS: Of a total of 259 patients, 39 patients met the inclusion criteria. TBRmax was highest in the GBM cohort (TBRmax 3.83 ± 1.30) and significantly higher (P = 0.004) compared to GII/III-IDHmut1p19qnc group, where TBRmax was lowest (TBRmax 2.05 ± 0.94). ROC analysis showed poor AUC for glioma subtyping (AUC 0.62) and high AUC of 0.79 for predicting IDH status. In the GII/III-IDHmut1p19qcod group, TBR values were slightly higher than in the IDHmut1p19qnc group.
CONCLUSIONS: MET-PET/MRI imaging in pre-operatively classifying glioma entities appears useful for the assessment of IDH status. However, a larger trial is needed prior to translation into the clinical routine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30516675     DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  18 in total

Review 1.  Conventional and advanced imaging throughout the cycle of care of gliomas.

Authors:  Gilles Reuter; Martin Moïse; Wolfgang Roll; Didier Martin; Arnaud Lombard; Félix Scholtes; Walter Stummer; Eric Suero Molina
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Non-invasive tumor decoding and phenotyping of cerebral gliomas utilizing multiparametric 18F-FET PET-MRI and MR Fingerprinting.

Authors:  Johannes Haubold; Aydin Demircioglu; Marcel Gratz; Martin Glas; Karsten Wrede; Ulrich Sure; Gerald Antoch; Kathy Keyvani; Mathias Nittka; Stephan Kannengiesser; Vikas Gulani; Mark Griswold; Ken Herrmann; Michael Forsting; Felix Nensa; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Machine learning-based differentiation between multiple sclerosis and glioma WHO II°-IV° using O-(2-[18F] fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Sied Kebir; Laurèl Rauschenbach; Martin Glas; Manuel Weber; Lazaros Lazaridis; Teresa Schmidt; Kathy Keyvani; Niklas Schäfer; Asma Milia; Lale Umutlu; Daniela Pierscianek; Martin Stuschke; Michael Forsting; Ulrich Sure; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Gerald Antoch; Patrick M Colletti; Domenico Rubello; Ken Herrmann; Ulrich Herrlinger; Björn Scheffler; Ralph A Bundschuh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  MGMT promoter methylation status shows no effect on [18F]FET uptake and CBF in gliomas: a stereotactic image-based histological validation study.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Song; Yi Shan; Leiming Wang; Ye Cheng; Hongwei Yang; Guoguang Zhao; Zhenguang Wang; Jie Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Static 18F-FET PET and DSC-PWI based on hybrid PET/MR for the prediction of gliomas defined by IDH and 1p/19q status.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Song; Leiming Wang; Hongwei Yang; Yongzhi Shan; Ye Cheng; Lixin Xu; Chengyan Dong; Guoguang Zhao; Jie Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Integration of dynamic parameters in the analysis of 18F-FDopa PET imaging improves the prediction of molecular features of gliomas.

Authors:  Merwan Ginet; Timothée Zaragori; Pierre-Yves Marie; Véronique Roch; Guillaume Gauchotte; Fabien Rech; Marie Blonski; Zohra Lamiral; Luc Taillandier; Laëtitia Imbert; Antoine Verger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence for molecular neuroimaging.

Authors:  Amanda J Boyle; Vincent C Gaudet; Sandra E Black; Neil Vasdev; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Katherine A Zukotynski
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

8.  The diagnostic value of lower glucose consumption for IDH1 mutated gliomas on FDG-PET.

Authors:  Feng-Min Liu; Yu-Fei Gao; Yanyan Kong; Yihui Guan; Jinsen Zhang; Shuai-Hong Li; Dan Ye; Wenyu Wen; Chuantao Zuo; Wei Hua
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Expression of glutamate carboxypeptidase II in the glial tumor recurrence evaluated in vivo using radionuclide imaging.

Authors:  Jolanta Kunikowska; Rafał Czepczyński; Dariusz Pawlak; Henryk Koziara; Kacper Pełka; Leszek Królicki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Patterns of local failure in patients with high-grade glioma after postoperative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Yunsheng Gao; Weiqiong Ni; Weiguo Cao; Cheng Xu; Jiayi Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.