BACKGROUND: To retrospectively analyze the failure patterns of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for high-grade glioma (HGG) under the new WHO classification, particularly focusing on relationship of recurrence pattern and molecular subtypes. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University from April 2014 to April 2018. A total of 56 patients diagnosed as WHO III-IV were included. Patients, who underwent pathological typing according to the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous (CNCS), including tumor grade and IDH status. We collected the basic data. The initial relapsed T1 enhancement MRI imaging was transferred and fused to the original treatment planning CT. The tumors were classified as in-field, marginal, or out-field if greater than 80%, 20-80%, or less than 20% of the recurrent volume fell within the 95% isodose line, respectively. RESULTS: The median overall survive was 22.0 months (95% CI: 16.7-27.2). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 85.8%, 43.9%, and 28.8%, respectively. Thirty-three (58.9%) patients progressed with a median progression survival of 15.9 (95% CI: 12.9-19.0) months. Of 33 patients experienced recurrence, 22 (66.7%) had in-field recurrence within a 9.3-month median period (range, 3-32.7 months), and 3 patients (9.1%) were respectively marginal recurrence occurred at 5.9, 6.4, and 15 months, and 6 patients (18.2%) developed out-field progression at a median of 16.1 (4.5-27.1) months, and 2 patients developed both in- and out-field recurrence (6.1%) at 3.2, 4.7 months, respectively. There were16 cases of WHO III, 40 cases of WHO IV, 13 cases of IDH mutation (IDHmt), 30 cases of wildtype (wt) and 13 cases of NOS. The incidence of recurrence of IDHmt (4 cases, 30%) was significantly lower than that of IDHwt (19 cases, 63.3%) and IDH NOS (10 cases, 76.9%) (P=0.001). Local recurrence (in the field and margin) of radiotherapy was 16 cases (84.2%) of IDHwt and 2 cases (50%) of IDHmt type (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we highlighted the importance of genomic research on identifying local failure patterns and providing recommendations of target delineation for HGG treatment. IDHwt HGG had a higher probability of in-field recurrence after radiotherapy, and RTOG target delineation guide was appropriate, while EORTC guidelines were recommended to IDHmt HGG. Further investigations in prospective randomized clinical trials were warranted to confirm our results. 2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: To retrospectively analyze the failure patterns of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for high-grade glioma (HGG) under the new WHO classification, particularly focusing on relationship of recurrence pattern and molecular subtypes. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University from April 2014 to April 2018. A total of 56 patients diagnosed as WHO III-IV were included. Patients, who underwent pathological typing according to the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous (CNCS), including tumor grade and IDH status. We collected the basic data. The initial relapsed T1 enhancement MRI imaging was transferred and fused to the original treatment planning CT. The tumors were classified as in-field, marginal, or out-field if greater than 80%, 20-80%, or less than 20% of the recurrent volume fell within the 95% isodose line, respectively. RESULTS: The median overall survive was 22.0 months (95% CI: 16.7-27.2). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 85.8%, 43.9%, and 28.8%, respectively. Thirty-three (58.9%) patients progressed with a median progression survival of 15.9 (95% CI: 12.9-19.0) months. Of 33 patients experienced recurrence, 22 (66.7%) had in-field recurrence within a 9.3-month median period (range, 3-32.7 months), and 3 patients (9.1%) were respectively marginal recurrence occurred at 5.9, 6.4, and 15 months, and 6 patients (18.2%) developed out-field progression at a median of 16.1 (4.5-27.1) months, and 2 patients developed both in- and out-field recurrence (6.1%) at 3.2, 4.7 months, respectively. There were16 cases of WHO III, 40 cases of WHO IV, 13 cases of IDH mutation (IDHmt), 30 cases of wildtype (wt) and 13 cases of NOS. The incidence of recurrence of IDHmt (4 cases, 30%) was significantly lower than that of IDHwt (19 cases, 63.3%) and IDH NOS (10 cases, 76.9%) (P=0.001). Local recurrence (in the field and margin) of radiotherapy was 16 cases (84.2%) of IDHwt and 2 cases (50%) of IDHmt type (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we highlighted the importance of genomic research on identifying local failure patterns and providing recommendations of target delineation for HGG treatment. IDHwt HGG had a higher probability of in-field recurrence after radiotherapy, and RTOG target delineation guide was appropriate, while EORTC guidelines were recommended to IDHmt HGG. Further investigations in prospective randomized clinical trials were warranted to confirm our results. 2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
High-grade glioma (HGG); IDH status; patterns of local failure
The addition of concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) to postoperative radiotherapy occupied a key role in improving prognosis of patients in HGG. It extended the median survival time of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) from 12.1 to 14.6 months, and has been considered the gold standard treatment for newly diagnosed GBM due to significant survival benefit with minimal additional toxicity (1). The target volume design after postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was inconsistent between EORTC and RTOG guidelines (2,3). However, from the existing data, there was no significant difference in the prognosis and recurrence patterns between the two radiotherapy strategies (4-7).Since 1994, with the discovery of important molecular markers (the co-deletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q, the recurrent mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase genes as IDH1/2, etc.) affecting the prognosis of glioma (8-11). In 2016, the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System for the first time integrated histological and molecular parameters, published the revision of WHO classification, which provided new tips and challenges in clinical practice (12), which not only enabled us to integrate them into the diagnostic process and to implement treatment strategies in patients by directing them to appropriate clinical practice (13), but also provided superior prognostic effect and more specific failure patterns. The relationship between molecular subtypes and on local failure patterns after standard adjuvant therapy has not been reported.The aim of this study retrospectively analyzes the failure patterns of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for HGG under the new WHO classification, particularly focusing on relationship of recurrence pattern and molecular subtypes.
Methods
Study design and eligibility
This retrospective study was conducted in Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University. Ethical approval was obtained from hospital’s review board. Data were collected from the hospital’s medical records and the online data-management system. Patient information was anonymized and de-identified before analysis. Patients were deemed eligible when they started curative intent radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. There were no medical interventions in the current study.
Patients and pretreatment evaluation
Clinical data: the patient’s clinical data from Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from April 2014 to April 2018 were included. A total of 56 patients diagnosed as WHO III–IV were included. Patients, who underwent pathological typing according to the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous (CNCS), including tumor grade and IDH status.We collected the basic data such as patient’s age, gender, preoperative magnetic resonance image (MRI), preradiotherapy KPS status, surgical procedure, degree of resection, pathological grade, target delineation method (RTOG or EORTC criteria), treatment schedule, progress pattern, progress time, survival status and date of death ().
IDHwt, isocitrate dehydrogenase wide type; IDHmt, IDHmutant.All patients were classified by pathological grade and IDH type according to the 2016 WHO Central Nervous System Classification (12). Complete examinations required IDH mutation assessment by immunohistochemistry, using antibodies of IDH1 R132H mutant protein and/or mutation hotspots that could identify alternatives sequencing IDH1 mutations such as R132C or IDH2 mutations (12,14,15). In the end, there were16 cases of WHO III, 40 cases of WHO IV, 13 cases of IDH mutation, 30 cases of wild type and 13 cases of IDH NOS ().
Table 2
Molecular classifications of 56 patients
Patients in 2016 WHO classification
No. (%)
AA, IDHwt
6 (10.7)
AA, IDHmt
5 (8.9)
AA, NOS
3 (5.4)
AO, IDHmt and 1p19q-codeleted
2 (3.6)
GBM, IDHwt
24 (42.9)
GBM, IDHmt
6 (10.7)
GBM, NOS
10 (17.9)
SUM
56 (100.0)
Treatment planning and delivery
All patients received radiation therapy and were immobilized in the supine position with a tailored head-thermoplastic mask, followed by a CT simulation. CT simulation (Brilliance Big Bore, Phillips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was performed at a slice thickness of 3–5 mm from the head to below the fourth cervical vertebra. CT scans were fused with enhancement MRI imaging within two weeks before radiotherapy, and delineated slice-by-slice according to EORTC or RTOG guidelines. The target volume delineation was in accordance with RTOG guidelines in 43 patients and 13 cases of EORTC guidelines (2,3). The standard prescription dose is 60 Gy (2 Gy per day from Monday to Friday). A 6-MV photon beam is provided by a Varian TrueBeam or Elekta linear accelerator using a multi-leaf collimator.
Combined chemotherapy
Based on the treatment guidelines for HGG at our hospital, concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone was recommended to patients with HGG. Fifty patients with concurrent TMZ, 43 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy. The median course of adjuvant chemotherapy were 6 [Radiother Oncol. 2016 ">2-23] cycles. The concurrent TMZ regimen was continuous daily TMZ at a dose of 75 mg/m2/day, 7 days a week during the whole radiotherapy period, and was followed by six cycles of adjuvant TMZ (150 to 200 mg/m2 for 5 days every 28 days). The duration of adjuvant cycles varied. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy due to economic or other reasons.
Recurrence definition
According to the RTOG or EORTC guidelines, the ECLIPSE treatment system or the Pinnacle version 8.0 planning system was used to delineate the target volume. The disease progression was determined by the physicians in the multi-disciplinary discussion of the central nervous system (CNS) of Ruijin Hospital based on the change of clinical symptoms and radiological MRI images. Once MRI indicated an abnormally enlarged lesion in the intracranial irradiation field, MRS examination or PET-MRI was recommended, or short-term routine MRI follow-up within 1–2 months to exclude from pseudoprogression. The initial relapsed T1 enhancement MRI imaging was transferred and fused to the original treatment planning CT. In order to reduce the bias, the tumor volume of the recurrent tumor on the MRI was first outlined and then fused with the treatment plan. The recurrent tumors were analyzed to determine the volume of recurrent tumor present within the 95% isodose line of the boost plan of the completed treatment. If ≥80% of T1 enhanced tumor volume was within 95% isodose line, recurrence was defined as “in-field”; “marginal” if >20 but ≤80% of the tumor volume was within the 95% isodose cure. They were both local recurrence. If <20% of the tumor volume is in the 95% isodose line, it was “out-field” or distant failure. Examples of the three failure patterns are shown in respectively.
Figure 1
Example of local and distant failure of plan CT (A1,B1,C1) and MRI (A2,B2,C2): red shadow (A1, B1 and C1): tumor recurrence; blue line (A1,C1): the 95% isodose line; green line (B1): 30% isodose line; (A1) in-field recurrence; (B1) out-field recurrence; (C1) marginal recurrence.
Example of local and distant failure of plan CT (A1,B1,C1) and MRI (A2,B2,C2): red shadow (A1, B1 and C1): tumor recurrence; blue line (A1,C1): the 95% isodose line; green line (B1): 30% isodose line; (A1) in-field recurrence; (B1) out-field recurrence; (C1) marginal recurrence.
Follow-up
All patients were evaluated weekly during treatment. After the completion of radiation therapy, the patients were followed up every 3 months during the first and second year, and every 3–6 months during the next 2–3 years, then every 6 months after that. Routine MRI to the head was performed during follow-up session. The last follow-up was followed by telephone and/or hospital outpatient visits.
Statistical analysis
Estimated overall survival (OS), defined as the first surgery or biopsy time to death. And progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the first surgery or biopsy time to any recurrence were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided and P values of 0.05 or less were considered significant Chi-square (v2) analysis was used to investigate differences in tumor recurrence distribution among all patients. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc.), was used for all statistical analysis.
Results
The last follow-up time was December 2018, and the follow-up rate was 100%. The follow-up time ranged from 3.9 to 53.9 (median 15.5) months. At the time of this analysis, twenty-five patients (44.6%) died due to intracranial tumor progression and 31 (55.4%) survived. Survival analysis showed that the median OS was (22.0±2.7) (95% CI: 16.7–27.2) months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 85.8%, 43.9%, and 28.8%, respectively. Thirty-three (58.9%) patients progressed with a median PFS of (15.9±1.6) (95% CI: 12.9–19.0) months ().
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).As shown in , of 33 patients experienced recurrence, 22 (66.7%) had in-field recurrence within a 9.3-month median period (range, 3–32.7 months), and 3 patients (9.1%) were respectively marginal recurrence occurred at 5.9, 6.4, and 15 months, and 6 patients (18.2%) developed out-field progression at a median of 16.1 (4.5–27.1) months, and 2 patients developed both in- and out-field recurrence (6.1%) at 3.2, 4.7 months, respectively.
Table 3
Pattern of recurrence in 33 patients with HGG
Failure pattern
n (%)
PFS (median) (months)
OS (median) (months)
In-field
22 (66.7)
9.3
17.5
Out-field
6 (18.2)
16.1
22
In- and out-field
2 (6.1)
4.7
17
Marginal
3 (9.1)
6.4
14
OS was 42.3 months in IDHmt patients, 15.2 months in IDHwt patients, and 21.6 months in IDH NOS patients (P=0.001) (), with respective progression-free survival rates of 32.6, 9.5 and 16.1 months (P=0.004).
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) according to IDH subtype. IDHwt, IDH wild type; IDH mt, IDH mutant type.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) according to IDH subtype. IDHwt, IDH wild type; IDH mt, IDH mutant type.The incidence of recurrence of IDHmt (4 cases, 30%) was significantly lower than that of IDHwt (19 cases, 63.3%) and IDH NOS (10 cases, 76.9%) (P=0.001). Local recurrence (in the field and margin) of radiotherapy was 16 cases (84.2%) of IDH wild type and 2 cases (50%) of IDH mutant type (P=0.05).
Discussion
All most all HGG patients experienced local recurrence after curative treatment options. The WHO classification of CNS tumors provided new insights into HGG clinical practice. Improvements in tumor profiling drastically altered understanding of recurrent pattern, which could lead to changes of target delineation (16). With the discovery of molecular pathology closely related to OS, researchers attempted to integrate different molecular and histologic parameters to develop a new tumor classification based on prognosis (10,17). And new subtypes integrated with molecular data provided superior prognostic information (14). Therefore, when considering diagnosis and treatment scheme, the focus should be on pathological grade as well as molecular alterations (13).To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to explore the relationship of patterns of local failure and molecular classifications in patients with high grade glioma after postoperative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. We demonstrated that recurrent pattern after adjuvant to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with HGG was correlated with molecular subtypes. In this study, altogether 33 patients who relapsed, 22 (66.7%) had in-field recurrence within a 9.3-month median period (range, 3–32.7 months), and 3 patients (9.1%) marginal progression occurred at 5.9, 6.4, and 15 months, respectively, and 6 patients (18.2%) developed distant progression at a median of 16.1 (4.5–27.1) months, with 2 patients (6.1%) at 3.2 and 4.7 months occur simultaneously in- and out-field.The incidence of recurrence of IDH mutants (4 cases, 30%) was significantly lower than that of IDH wild type (19 cases, 63.3%) and IDH NOS (10 cases, 76.9%) (P=0.001). Local recurrence (in the field and margin) of radiotherapy was 16 cases (84.2%) of IDH wild type and 2 cases (50%) of IDH mutant type (P=0.05). IDH widetype HGG had a higher probability of in-field recurrence after radiotherapy, and RTOG target delineation guide could be appropriate, while EORTC guidelines were recommended to IDHmt HGG.The available data showed that patterns of failure in HGG following surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy had consistently shown that 80–90% of recurrences are within 2 cm from the original site (18,19), as the main cause of treatment failure. Our results were consistent with these published data (18,19), and the most common recurrence developed in 2 cm from primary tumor, accounting for 75.8%. The local failure rate was insignificant between group RTOG and EORTC guideline, 82.6%, and 60.0% (P=0.17). According to the RTOG protocol, the irradiated brain volume is relatively large. However, clinical target volume delineation using postoperative residual tumor and cavity plus a 2-cm margin, rather than intentionally including peritumoral edema, did not appear to alter the central pattern of failure for patients with HGG. Brain irradiation was associated with neurotoxic side effects including radionecrosis and cognitive decline (20,21). The volume of irradiated brain was considered the one of main reasons of these complications. So it was obviously that RTOG guideline was inappropriate for the above patient with IDHmt HGG, in view of their prolonged survival and the RT related risk of cognitive impairment. At the same time, the reduced irradiation volume of normal brain was subjected to high-dose irradiation, so as to further improve local control (6).In the future, however, the definition of GTV and CTV may be achieved with the use of metabolic MRS, PET/CT and PET/MR fusion-imaging, which will further reduce volume to be irradiated for this subgroup patients (22-24).There were several limitation must be addressed in the current study. The retrospective nature of this analysis and single institute design with the relatively small sample certainly serve pitfalls of this study. Given the aggressive nature of HGG and the complexity of molecular alterations, effective treatment methods are a major unmet medical need Identification and validation of new biomarkers and incorporation them into target delineation could reduce the local failure and improve long term survival of this devastating disease (25).
Conclusions
In this study, we highlighted the importance of genomic research on identifying local failure patterns and providing recommendations of target delineation for HGG treatment. IDHwt HGG had a higher probability of in-field recurrence after radiotherapy, and RTOG target delineation guide was appropriate, while EORTC guidelines were recommended to IDHmt HGG. Further investigations in prospective randomized clinical trials were warranted to confirm our results.
Authors: B Emami; J Lyman; A Brown; L Coia; M Goitein; J E Munzenrider; B Shank; L J Solin; M Wesson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-05-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: June L Chan; Susan W Lee; Benedick A Fraass; Daniel P Normolle; Harry S Greenberg; Larry R Junck; Stephen S Gebarski; Howard M Sandler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heidi S Phillips; Samir Kharbanda; Ruihuan Chen; William F Forrest; Robert H Soriano; Thomas D Wu; Anjan Misra; Janice M Nigro; Howard Colman; Liliana Soroceanu; P Mickey Williams; Zora Modrusan; Burt G Feuerstein; Ken Aldape Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Deanna H Pafundi; Nadia N Laack; Ryan S Youland; Ian F Parney; Val J Lowe; Caterina Giannini; Brad J Kemp; Michael P Grams; Jonathan M Morris; Jason M Hoover; Leland S Hu; Jann N Sarkaria; Debra H Brinkmann Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Alvin R Cabrera; John P Kirkpatrick; John B Fiveash; Helen A Shih; Eugene J Koay; Stephen Lutz; Joshua Petit; Samuel T Chao; Paul D Brown; Michael Vogelbaum; David A Reardon; Arnab Chakravarti; Patrick Y Wen; Eric Chang Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-03-31
Authors: Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Daniel H Lachance; Annette M Molinaro; Kyle M Walsh; Paul A Decker; Hugues Sicotte; Melike Pekmezci; Terri Rice; Matt L Kosel; Ivan V Smirnov; Gobinda Sarkar; Alissa A Caron; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Corinne E Praska; Anisha R Chada; Chandralekha Halder; Helen M Hansen; Lucie S McCoy; Paige M Bracci; Roxanne Marshall; Shichun Zheng; Gerald F Reis; Alexander R Pico; Brian P O'Neill; Jan C Buckner; Caterina Giannini; Jason T Huse; Arie Perry; Tarik Tihan; Mitchell S Berger; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Joseph Wiemels; John K Wiencke; Margaret R Wrensch; Robert B Jenkins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 176.079