| Literature DB >> 30509225 |
Meizhen Zhang1,2,3, Moritz Schumann1,4, Tao Huang5, Timo Törmäkangas6, Sulin Cheng1,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to examine the associations of normal weight obesity (NWO) with physical fitness in Chinese university students. As a secondary aim, we assessed whether possible differences in physical fitness between students classified as NWO and normal weight non-obese (NWNO) were mediated by skeletal muscles mass.Entities:
Keywords: Body composition; Body-mass index; Physical activity; Public health; Skeletal muscle mass
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30509225 PMCID: PMC6278052 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6238-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Conceptual model of the mediation analysis. (a representing the effect of weight group (WG) on body height-adjusted skeletal muscle mass (SMM/BH), b the effect of SMM/BH on physical fitness (PF), and c the effect of weight group on physical fitness (PF))
Participants characteristics stratified by gender and weight group (Mean ± SD)
| Variables | Men ( | Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWNO ( | NWO ( | NWNO ( | NWO ( | |
| Age (year) | 20.2 ± 1.4* | 20.9 ± 1.8 | 19.7 ± 1.6** | 20.6 ± 1.5 |
| BH (cm) | 175.8 ± 6.5** | 171.5 ± 6.8 | 162.9 ± 6.2* | 160.0 ± 5.1 |
| BW (Kg) | 65.3 ± 6.6 | 66.1 ± 6.2 | 53.9 ± 5.5 | 55.5 ± 4.6 |
| WC (cm) | 75.0 ± 4.4** | 79.7 ± 4.0 | 68.1 ± 4.4** | 73.2 ± 4.5 |
| VFA (cm2) | 28.5 ± 13.7** | 59.7 ± 13.3 | 52.4 ± 9.1** | 73.2 ± 14.3 |
| Fat % | 12.3 ± 3.8** | 23.1 ± 3.4 | 24.4 ± 2.6** | 32.1 ± 2.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.1 ± 1.4** | 22.5 ± 1.2 | 20.3 ± 1.3** | 21.7 ± 1.3 |
| SMM/BH (Kg/m) | 18.3 ± 1.5** | 16.5 ± 1.5 | 13.5 ± 1.1** | 12.6 ± 0.9 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 69.5 ± 7.0 | 71.9 ± 8.8 | 66.9 ± 6.1** | 72.1 ± 8.4 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 120.4 ± 9.5 | 119.6 ± 10.0 | 104.9 ± 8.3** | 112.3 ± 10.7 |
| HR | 72.7 ± 9.8 | 73.7 ± 12.5 | 75.5 ± 9.4 | 75.8 ± 9.7 |
| PA (Mets*H/wk) | 30.4 ± 10.4 | 27.8 ± 13.1 | 21.7 ± 8.6* | 27.5 ± 15.3 |
Abbreviations: NWNO Normal weight non-obese, NWO Normal weight obesity
BH Body height, BW Body weight, WC Waist circumference, VFA Visceral fat area, Fat% Body fat percentage, BMI Body mass index, SMM Skeletal muscle mass, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, SBP Systolic blood pressure, HR Heart rate, PA Physical activity;
*Indicates p < 0.05 (NWNO vs. NWO)
**Indicates p < 0.01 (NWNO vs. NWO)
Fig. 2Distance covered during the Andersen Test in NWO and NWNO
Fig. 3Countermovement jumping (CMJ) height in NWO and NWNO
Fig. 4Time needed to cover the 5 × 5-m shuttle run test in NWO and NWNO
Fig. 5Sum of physical fitness score in NWO and NWNO
Standardized effects of the mediation models by gender
| Model (male) | Path coefficients | 95% CI | Model (female) | Path coefficients | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andersen test (A) | Andersen test (A) | ||||||
| Direct effects | Direct effects | ||||||
| WG → SMM (a) | −0.46 | − 0.60~ − 0.32 | < 0.001 | WG → SMM ( | −0.38 | − 0.54~ − 0.22 | < 0.001 |
| SMM → A ( | 0.28 | 0.10~0.45 | 0.002 | SMM → A ( | 0.25 | 0.06~0.45 | 0.012 |
| WG → A (c) | −0.36 | −0.53~ − 0.19 | < 0.001 | WG → A (c) | −0.33 | − 0.53~ − 0.14 | 0.001 |
| Indirect effects | Indirect effects | ||||||
| WG → A | − 0.13 | −0.22~ − 0.04 | 0.006 | WG → A | −0.10 | − 0.18~ − 0.01 | 0.029 |
| Total effect | Total effect | ||||||
| WG → A | −0.49 | − 0.63~ − 0.34 | < 0.001 | WG → A | −0.43 | − 0.61~ − 0.25 | < 0.001 |
| 0.30 | 0.14~0.46 | < 0.001 | 0.24 | 0.08~0.40 | 0.003 | ||
| CMJ (C) | CMJ (C) | ||||||
| Direct effects | Direct effects | ||||||
| WG → SMM ( | −0.46 | −0.60~ − 0.32 | < 0.001 | WG → SMM ( | − 0.38 | −0.54~ − 0.22 | < 0.001 |
| SMM → C ( | 0.30 | 0.13~0.47 | < 0.001 | SMM → C ( | 0.17 | −0.02~0.35 | 0.074 |
| WG → C (c) | −0.36 | − 0.52~0.20 | < 0.001 | WG → C (c) | − 0.34 | −0.52~ − 0.16 | < 0.001 |
| Indirect effects | Indirect effects | ||||||
| WG → C | − 0.14 | − 0.23~ − 0.05 | 0.002 | WG → C | − 0.06 | − 0.14~0.01 | 0.098 |
| Total effect | Total effect | ||||||
| WG → C | − 0.50 | − 0.63~ − 0.36 | < 0.001 | WG → C | − 0.40 | −0.56~ − 0.24 | < 0.001 |
| 0.32 | 0.18~0.46 | < 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.04~0.32 | 0.007 | ||
| 5mSR (S) | 5mSR (S) | ||||||
| Direct effects | Direct effects | ||||||
| WG → SMM ( | −0.46 | −0.60~ − 0.32 | < 0.001 | WG → SMM ( | − 0.38 | −0.54~ − 0.22 | < 0.001 |
| SMM → S ( | − 0.27 | −0.43~ − 0.10 | 0.002 | SMM → S ( | −0.30 | − 0.48~ − 0.12 | 0.001 |
| WG → S (c) | 0.37 | 0.21~0.53 | < 0.001 | WG → S (c) | 0.36 | 0.18~0.53 | < 0.001 |
| Indirect effects | Indirect effects | ||||||
| WG → S | 0.12 | 0.04~0.21 | 0.006 | WG → S | 0.11 | 0.03~0.20 | 0.007 |
| Total effect | Total effect | ||||||
| WG → S | 0.49 | 0.35~0.62 | < 0.001 | WG → S | 0.47 | 0.32~0.63 | < 0.001 |
| 0.29 | 0.15~0.43 | < 0.001 | 0.30 | 0.14~0.46 | < 0.001 | ||
| SumPF (SPF) | SumPF (SPF) | ||||||
| Direct effects | Direct effects | ||||||
| WG → SMM | −0.46 | −0.60~ − 0.32 | < 0.001 | WG → SMM (a) | − 0.38 | − 0.54~ − 0.22 | < 0.001 |
| SMM → SPF | 0.32 | 0.16~0.48 | < 0.001 | SMM → SPF ( | 0.34 | 0.17~0.51 | < 0.001 |
| WG → SPF (c) | − 0.49 | − 0.63~ − 0.34 | < 0.001 | WG → SPF (c) | −0.48 | − 0.64~ − 0.32 | < 0.001 |
| Indirect effects | Indirect effects | ||||||
| WG → SPF | − 0.15 | −0.23~ − 0.06 | 0.001 | WG → SPF | −0.13 | − 0.21~ − 0.05 | 0.003 |
| Total effect | Total effect | ||||||
| WG → SPF | −0.63 | − 0.74~ − 0.52 | < 0.001 | WG → SPF | − 0.61 | −0.75~ − 0.47 | < 0.001 |
| 0.48 | 0.34~0.62 | < 0.001 | 0.47 | 0.31~0.63 | < 0.001 | ||
Abbreviations: WG Weight group, SMM Skeletal muscle mass, CMJ Countermovement jump, 5mSR 5 × 5-m shuttle run, SumPF Sum of physical fitness score, 95% CI 95% confidence intervals