Literature DB >> 30505596

Outcomes associated with robotic approach to pancreatic resections.

Caitlin Takahashi1, Ravi Shridhar2, Jamie Huston3, Kenneth Meredith3,4.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive techniques have improved post-operative outcomes, however, the majority of pancreatic surgery, known for its complexity, is still performed via open approaches. The development of robotics has improved dexterity which may allow for application in more complex surgeries. We queried a prospectively maintained robotic database to identify patients who underwent robotic pancreatic resection by a single surgeon between 2012 and 2016. Patient demographics and operative outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis and Pearson's Chi-square test as appropriate. We identified 119 patients; 65 Whipples [Robotic Whipple (RW)], 43 distal pancreatectomies, 4 total pancreatectomies, 6 pancreatic enucleations, and 1 robotic cyst gastrostomy with a median age of 71 [24-91], median body mass index (BMI) of 27.6 (16.8-40.2), and American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) of 3. The median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 125 [25-800] and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) 6 [1-34]. Mean operative time for RW decreased after 15 cases (578 vs. 457 minutes, P<0.004). Conversions to open occurred in 5 (4.2%) patients. In total of 117 (98.3%) patients underwent R0 resections and the median lymph node (LN) harvest was 16 [0-37]. The 30 and 90 days mortality was 1 (0.8%). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5) were seen in 16 (13.4%) cases (20.3%) but decreased steadily as volume increased (case 30). Pancreatic leaks occurred in 14 (11.8%): A, 8 (6.7%); B, 4 (3.4%); and C, 2 (1.7%). Robotic assisted approaches to pancreatic resections is feasible. However, it takes approximately 15 cases before a decrease in operative time and 30 cases before major complications are decreased. These trends in complications are associated with surgeon experience and volume are critical to consider in robotic pancreatic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic; Whipple; distal pancreatectomy; pancreatic resection

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505596      PMCID: PMC6219977          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.08.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  12 in total

1.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Juan Santiago Azagra; Claudio Bassi; Georges Delvaux; Joseph Weerts; Jean-Michel Fabre; Jean Boulez; Jacques Baulieux; Jean-Louis Peix; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, neuroendocrine and periampullary pancreatic tumors using robotic surgery: a safe and feasible technique.

Authors:  Antonio Luiz de Vasconcellos Macedo; Vladimir Schraibman; Samuel Okazaki; Fernando Concilio Mauro; Marina Gabrielle Epstein; Suzan Menasce Goldman; Suzana A S Lustosa; Delcio Matos
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-07

4.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience.

Authors:  Michael L Kendrick; Daniel Cusati
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-01

6.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: some benefits of evolving surgical techniques.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakamura; Eiji Uchida; Tsutomu Nomura; Takayuki Aimoto; Satoshi Matsumoto; Takashi Tajiri
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  Retrospective analyses of trends in pancreatic surgery: indications, operative techniques, and postoperative outcome of 1,120 pancreatic resections.

Authors:  Uwe A Wittel; Frank Makowiec; Olivia Sick; Gabriel J Seifert; Tobias Keck; Ulrich Adam; Ulrich T Hopt
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  State of the art robotic distal pancreatectomy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Amr I Al Abbas; Herbert J Zeh Iii; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 2.  Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Vining; Kinga B Skowron; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-23

3.  Association of Mentorship and a Formal Robotic Proficiency Skills Curriculum With Subsequent Generations' Learning Curve and Safety for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  MaryJoe K Rice; Jacob C Hodges; Johanna Bellon; Jeffrey Borrebach; Amr I Al Abbas; Ahmad Hamad; L Mark Knab; A James Moser; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Is robotic distal pancreatectomy better than laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy after the learning curve? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chuwen Chen; Jing Hu; Hao Yang; Xuejun Zhuo; Qiuping Ren; Qingbo Feng; Miye Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  401 consecutive minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies: lessons learned from 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Esposito; Marco Ramera; Luca Casetti; Matteo De Pastena; Martina Fontana; Isabella Frigerio; Alessandro Giardino; Roberto Girelli; Luca Landoni; Giuseppe Malleo; Giovanni Marchegiani; Salvatore Paiella; Antonio Pea; Paolo Regi; Filippo Scopelliti; Massimiliano Tuveri; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.453

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.