Literature DB >> 34050901

State of the art robotic distal pancreatectomy: a review of the literature.

Amr I Al Abbas1, Herbert J Zeh Iii2, Patricio M Polanco3.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy has become increasingly used in practice. While laparoscopic approach is the most commonly used technique, robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) has emerged as a safe, feasible and effective approach for distal pancreatectomy. Most studies have shown that RDP improved perioperative surgical outcomes and has equivalent oncologic outcomes to open technique. Widespread adoption is limited by a steep learning curve, higher costs and the need for institutional training protocols in place for safe integration of the platform into practice.

Keywords:  Learning curve; Minimally invasive; Operative technique; Outcomes; Robotic distal pancreatectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050901     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01070-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  37 in total

1.  Minimally invasive and robotic surgery.

Authors:  M J Mack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Reduced 30-Day Mortality After Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Population Based Study From the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA).

Authors:  Lieke Gietelink; Michel W J M Wouters; Willem A Bemelman; Jan Willem Dekker; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  How does the robot affect outcomes? A retrospective review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  Abhijit Shaligram; Jayaraj Unnirevi; Anton Simorov; Vishal M Kothari; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [Pelviscopic appendectomy].

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate?

Authors:  David A Kooby; William G Hawkins; C Max Schmidt; Sharon M Weber; David J Bentrem; Theresa W Gillespie; Johnita Byrd Sellers; Nipun B Merchant; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C G Martin; Hong Jin Kim; Syed Ahmad; Clifford S Cho; Alexander A Parikh; Carrie K Chu; Nicholas A Hamilton; Courtney J Doyle; Scott Pinchot; Amanda Hayman; Rebecca McClaine; Attila Nakeeb; Charles A Staley; Kelly M McMasters; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Missed Opportunity: Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Is Associated With Lower Incidence of Small Bowel Obstruction Compared to an Open Approach.

Authors:  Christopher T Aquina; Christian P Probst; Adan Z Becerra; James C Iannuzzi; Bradley J Hensley; Katia Noyes; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; John A Stauffer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; O Germay; R Izizaw; M Degueldre; J Vandromme; E Capelluto; J Bruyns
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W Reynolds
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.