Literature DB >> 30505593

Esophagectomy from then to now.

Caitlin Takahashi1, Ravi Shridhar2, Jamie Huston3, Kenneth Meredith3,4.   

Abstract

We have come a long way from the onset of surgery for esophageal cancer. Surgical resection is pivotal for the long-term survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Moreover, advancements in post-operative care and surgical techniques have contributed to reductions in morbidity. More recently minimally invasive esophagectomy has been increasingly used in patients undergoing esophageal cancer resection. Potential advantages of MIE include: the decreased pulmonary complications, lower post-operative wound infection, decreased post-operative pain, and decreased length of hospitalization. The application of robotics to esophageal surgery is becoming more widespread. Robotic esophageal surgery has potential advantages over the known limitations of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches to esophagectomy while adhering to the benefits of the minimally invasive approach. This paper is a review of the evolution from open esophagectomy to the most recent robotic approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Transhiatal esophagectomy; robotic esophagectomy; transthoracic esophagectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505593      PMCID: PMC6219976          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.08.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  56 in total

1.  Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  P M Safranek; J Cubitt; M I Booth; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R J J Verhage; E J Hazebroek; J Boone; R Van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  What should be the gold standard for the surgical component in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Asad Kutup; Michael F Nentwich; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Dean Bogoevski; Jakob R Izbicki; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  K Meredith; J Huston; O Andacoglu; R Shridhar
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Babatunde A Yerokun; Zhifei Sun; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brian C Gulack; Paul J Speicher; Mohamed A Adam; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis; David H Harpole; Mark F Berry; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  J S Bolton; A Sardi; J C Bowen; J K Ellis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  David P Kelsen; Katryn A Winter; Leonard L Gunderson; Joanne Mortimer; Norman C Estes; Daniel G Haller; Jaffer A Ajani; Walter Kocha; Bruce D Minsky; Jack A Roth; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  Open surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: transhiatal vs. transthoracic, does it really matter?

Authors:  Uriel Clemente-Gutiérrez; Heriberto Medina-Franco; Oscar Santes; Jesús Morales-Maza; Alejandro Alfaro-Goldaracena; Martin J Heslin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

Review 2.  The Role of Prehabilitation in Modern Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Augustinas Bausys; Morta Mazeikaite; Klaudija Bickaite; Bernardas Bausys; Rimantas Bausys; Kestutis Strupas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Comparison of the therapeutic effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection and minimally invasive esophagectomy for T1 stage esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Lei Gong; Jie Yue; Xiaofeng Duan; Hongjing Jiang; Hongdian Zhang; Xi Zhang; Zhentao Yu
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection.

Authors:  Lukas F Liesenfeld; Peter Sauer; Markus K Diener; Ulf Hinz; Thomas Schmidt; Beat P Müller-Stich; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; Anja Schaible
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint.

Authors:  Cristian Deana; Luigi Vetrugno; Elena Bignami; Flavio Bassi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.005

6.  Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy.

Authors:  Lei Gong; Hongjing Jiang; Jie Yue; Xiaofeng Duan; Peng Tang; Peng Ren; Xijiang Zhao; Xiangming Liu; Xi Zhang; Zhentao Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

7.  Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes dissection in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Jingpu Wang; Yang Yang; Mohammed Shafiulla Shaik
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.241

8.  The procedure of single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy and laparoscopic surgery for radical esophagectomy.

Authors:  Xiaojin Wang; Xiaojian Li; Wenwen Huo; Hua Cheng; Bin Zhang; Hongcheng Zhong; Ruiqi Wang; Qingdong Cao
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2019-06-11

9.  Prognostic risk factors for respiratory failure after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Quanguan Su; Huan Li; Honghong Yan; Wenxiao Wei; Wei Liao; Gang Ma
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.241

10.  McKeown or Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingpu Wang; Jingfeng Hu; Dengyan Zhu; Kankan Wang; Chunzhi Gao; Tingting Shan; Yang Yang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.