Literature DB >> 30505491

Risk stratification of severe aortic stenosis according to new guidelines: long term outcomes.

Andrea Colli1, Eleonora Bizzotto1, Laura Besola1, Dario Gregori1, Francesca Toto1, Erica Manzan1, Gino Gerosa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease assign a class Ia indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR) only to patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis and asymptomatic patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) or positive exercise test. We examined the long-term outcomes for patients undergoing AVR for aortic stenosis over a 11-year period at our institution compared to current international guidelines for AVR.
METHODS: Patients who had undergone isolated AVR for severe aortic valve stenosis between January 2001 and December 2012 were selected. The population was divided into subgroups based on preoperative LVEF (< or ≥50%) and on presence/absence of symptoms (NYHA =I or ≥II, respectively).
RESULTS: We identified 607 patients with a median follow-up (FU) time of 5.75 years (IQR 3.24-8.00 years). The presence of symptoms did not have a significant impact on cardiovascular mortality (P=0.201). Patients with LVEF <50% displayed a higher long-term cardiovascular mortality rate (P=0.015). Multivariate analysis showed that preserved LVEF was a protective factor for asymptomatic patients (P=0.021), while preoperative LVEF did not affect the mortality rate in symptomatic patients (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54-1.44). Correspondingly, asymptomatic patients with reduced LVEF were found to be at a higher risk of long-term mortality compared to the other groups (P=0.011). The only other independent risk factor for death was age (HR 6.46; 95% CI, 2.22-18.76).
CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, current international class I indications for symptomatic patients ensure good long-term survival, while class I indications for asymptomatic patients with reduced LVEF are associated with poor long-term survival. Our results suggest that early surgery should also be considered also for asymptomatic patients with preserved LVEF, particularly in cases of very low operative risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymptomatic; aortic valve stenosis; guidelines; outcome

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505491      PMCID: PMC6236158          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  24 in total

Review 1.  Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention.

Authors:  Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Johnston; Edward G Soltesz; Nakul Vakil; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eric E Roselli; Joseph F Sabik; Nicholas G Smedira; Lars G Svensson; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Timing of valve replacement in aortic stenosis. Moving closer to perfection.

Authors:  B A Carabello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Lee A Fleisher; Hani Jneid; Michael J Mack; Christopher J McLeod; Patrick T O'Gara; Vera H Rigolin; Thoralf M Sundt; Annemarie Thompson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Julien Magne; Erwan Donal; Laurent Davin; Kim O'Connor; Monica Rosca; Catherine Szymanski; Bernard Cosyns; Luc A Piérard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up.

Authors:  Patricia A Pellikka; Maurice E Sarano; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph F Malouf; Kent R Bailey; Christopher G Scott; Marion E Barnes; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival.

Authors:  F Schwarz; P Baumann; J Manthey; M Hoffmann; G Schuler; H C Mehmel; W Schmitz; W Kübler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Low-dose acetyl salicylic acid versus oral anticoagulation after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Final report of the ACTION registry.

Authors:  Andrea Colli; Jean-Philippe Verhoye; Robin Heijmen; Manuel Antunes
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 9.  The natural history of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  D Horstkotte; F Loogen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database.

Authors:  J Matthew Brennan; Fred H Edwards; Yue Zhao; Sean O'Brien; Michael E Booth; Rachel S Dokholyan; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.