| Literature DB >> 30501061 |
Elayne Barros Ferreira1, Walter Ferreira da Silva Júnior2, Jonas Gabriel de Oliveira Pinheiro3, Aldilane Gonçalves da Fonseca4, Telma Maria Araújo Moura Lemos5, Hugo Alexandre de Oliveira Rocha6, Eduardo Pereira de Azevedo7, Francisco Jaime Bezerra Mendonça Junior8, Ádley Antonini Neves de Lima9.
Abstract
The novel 2-aminothiophene derivativeEntities:
Keywords: 2-aminothiophene derivative; anti-proliferative; antitumor; cytostatic; β-cyclodextrin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30501061 PMCID: PMC6320897 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structure of 2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene-3-carbonitrile (6CN).
Figure 23D demonstration of 6CN-βCD association at its lower energy at two different angles. Dashed lines represent intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The chemical elements are represented by different colors: yellow (sulfur), blue (nitrogen), red (oxygen) and gray (carbon).
Figure 3Phase solubility diagram of 6CN with different concentrations of βCD.
Figure 4DSC curves for 6CN (I), βCD (II) and 6CN-βCD obtained by PM (III), KND (IV) and ROTA (V). The DSC curves were obtained at a temperature range of 25 to 350 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1, with dynamic atmosphere of N2 (50 mL min−1).
Figure 5TG/DTG and TGA first derivative curves for 6CN, β-CD, and 6CN/β-CD obtained by PM, KND and ROTA at a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1, under dynamic atmosphere of N2 (100 mL·min−1).
Figure 6FTIR spectra of 6CN (I), βCD (II), PM (III), KND (IV), ROTA (V) (4000 to 400 cm−1 and resolution of 4). The chemical group that correspond to each band is also displayed.
Figure 7XRD diffratograms of 6CN, βCD and the 6CN-βCD binary systems obtained by PM, KND and ROTA.
Figure 8Micrographs of 6CN (A), βCD (B), and binary systems obtained by PM (C), KND (D) and ROTA (E).
Figure 9Viability of non-tumoral cells (3T3) as determined by the MTT method after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to DMEM (control), ET1% (vehicle), Cisp (50 μM cisplatin as positive control) and 5, 10, 25 and 50 μM of each test sample: 6CN (A) and binary systems obtained by PM (B), KND (C) and ROTA (D). Results were expressed as bar charts showing the mean percentage ± SD (n = 3 for each experimental group). Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post-test using GraphPad Prism version 5.00. A difference in the mean values of of **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Figure 10Viability of hepatic adenocarcinoma cells (HepG2) as determined by the MTT method after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to DMEM (control), ET1% (vehicle), Cisp (50 μM cisplatin as positive control) and 5, 10, 25 and 50 μM of each test sample: 6CN (A) and binary systems obtained by PM (B), KND (C) and ROTA (D). Results were expressed as bar charts showing the mean percentage ± SD (n = 3 for each experimental group). Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post-test using GraphPad Prism version 5.00. A difference in the mean values of *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Figure 11Viability of renal carcinoma cells (786-0) as determined by MTT method after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to DMEM (control), ET1% (vehicle), Cisp (50 μM cisplatin as positive control) and 5, 10, 25 and 50 μM of each test sample: 6CN (A) and binary systems obtained by PM (B), KND (C) and ROTA (D). Results were expressed as bar charts showing the mean percentage ± SD (n = 3 for each experimental group). Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post-test using GraphPad Prism version 5.00. A difference in the mean values of *** p < 0.001, and * p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.