| Literature DB >> 25257529 |
Jahamunna A A Barbosa1, Ariana Zoppi2, Mario A Quevedo3, Polyanne N de Melo4, Arthur S A de Medeiros5, Letícia Streck6, Alice R de Oliveira7, Matheus F Fernandes-Pedrosa8, Marcela R Longhi9, Arnóbio A da Silva-Júnior10.
Abstract
The interaction of methotrexate (MTX) with beta-cyclodextrin (β-CD) in the presence of triethanolamine (TEA) was investigated with the aim to elucidate the mechanism whereby self-assembly cyclodextrin systems work in association with this third component. Solubility diagram studies showed synergic increment of the MTX solubility to be about thirty-fold. Experiments using 2D ROESY and molecular modeling studies revealed the inclusion of aromatic ring III of the drug into β-CD cavity, in which TEA contributes by intensifying MTX interaction with β-CD and stabilizes MTX:β-CD:TEA ternary complex by electrostatic interaction. The maintenance of these interactions in solid phase was also studied in ternary MTX:β-CD:TEA and comparisons were made with freeze dried binary MTX:β-CD and physical mixtures. FTIR studies evidenced that MTX-β-CD interaction remained in solid ternary complexes, which was also supported by thermal (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TG)/first derivative of TG analysis (DTG) and C,N,H elementary analysis) and structural (X-ray diffraction analysis, (XRD)) studies, mainly regarding the increment of drug stability. The efficient in vitro drug dissolution studies successfully demonstrated the contribution of ternary complexes, which highlights the importance of this possible new raw material for further applications in drug delivery systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25257529 PMCID: PMC4200828 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150917077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Phase solubility diagrams of (a) Methotrexate (MTX) in different β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) concentrations; and (b) MTX in fixed 15 mM β-CD associated with different triethanolamine (TEA) concentrations.
Chemical shifts for protons of MTX and β-CD in different systems.
| Studied Protons | Free State (ppm) | Binary Complex (ppm) | Δδ (ppm) | Ternary Complex (ppm) | Δδ (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTX | |||||
| Ha | 8.6892 | 8.3530 | −0.3362 | 8.3677 | −0.3215 |
| Hc | 3.2404 | 3.4216 | 0.1812 | 3.3696 | 0.1292 |
| Hd | 6.9292 | 6.7362 | −0.1930 | 6.7828 | −0.1464 |
| He | 7.7425 | 7.7527 | 0.0102 | 7.7676 | 0.0251 |
| β-CD | |||||
| H1 | 5.0984 | 5.0875 | −0.0109 | 5.0845 | −0.0139 |
| H2 | 3.6778 | 3.6762 | −0.0016 | 3.6670 | −0.0108 |
| H3 | 3.9936 | 3.9065 | −0.0871 | 3.9416 | −0.0520 |
| H4 | 3.6118 | 3.6079 | −0.0039 | 3.6051 | −0.0067 |
| H5 | 3.9063 | 3.8395 | −0.0668 | 3.8103 | −0.0960 |
| H6 | 3.9063 | 3.8782 | −0.0281 | 3.8694 | −0.0369 |
Figure 2(a) Schematic representation of chemical structure and proton atom numbering scheme for MTX, β-CD and TEA; (b) 1H-NMR Spectra of MTX, binary MTX:β-CD complex, ternary MTX:β-CD:TEA complex and β-CD; (c) Partial contour plot of the 2D ROESY spectrum of (c) MTX:β-CD binary; and (d) MTX:β-CD:TEA ternary complexes (F1 β-CD protons and F2 MTX protons).
Figure 3Binding mode predicted by molecular docking assays of MTX to β-CD in (a) top view; (b) side view; and (c) rear view; (d) MTX:β-CD (cluster 1); (e) MTX:β-CD (cluster 2); and clusters of MTX:β-CD:TEA; (f) pose-1 and (g) pose-2.
Energetic decomposition analysis (MM-PBSA method) performed on the molecular dynamics trajectory for MTX:β-CD and MTX:β-CD:TEA complexes.
| Energetic Component | Value (kcal·mol−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Binary Complex | Ternary Complex | |
| Electrostatic | −30.07 | −220.22 |
| Van der Waals | −33.20 | −30.09 |
| Total Gas Energy | −63.27 | −250.30 |
| Solvation Energy | 43.76 | 217.87 |
| Estimated ∆ | −19.50 | −32.43 |
Intermolecular MTX-β-CD interactions with occupancy (%) in the overall trajectory and average distance (Å) are informed.
| Atoms | Occupancy (%) | Average Distance (Å) |
|---|---|---|
| MTX(O3):β-CD (O-H6) | 24.54 | 2.68 (±0.11) |
| MTX(O4):β-CD (O-H6) | 15.80 | 2.65 (±0.15) |
| MTX(O2):β-CD (O-H6) | 5.52 | 2.70 (±0.12) |
| β-CD (O3):MTX (NH28) | 6.35 | 2.88 (±0.08) |
C,H,N elementary analysis results.
| Sample | Theoretical %N from MTX | Analytical Content (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | N | ||
| MTX | 24.65 | 46.67 | 5.45 | 21.65 |
| β-CD | – | 38.01 | 6.78 | 0.01 |
| β-CD:MTX | 1.75% | 38.96 | 6.71 | 1.55 |
| β-CD:MTX:TEA | 1.80% | 40.65 | 6.77 | 2.74 |
Figure 4FTIR spectra of pure β-CD and MTX, physical mixtures and respective binary and ternary freeze-dried complexes.
Figure 5DSC and TG/DTG curves of β-CD, MTX, binary and ternary physical mixtures and binary (BC) and ternary (TC) freeze-dried complexes. Comparisons made for (a) binary complexes; and (b) ternary complexes.
Figure 6Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) β-CD; (b) MTX; (c) MTX:β-CD binary; and (d) MTX:β-CD:TEA ternary freeze-dried complexes.
Figure 7Dissolution studies for MTX, MTX:β-CD binary and MTX:β-CD:TEA ternary complexes.