| Literature DB >> 25257529 |
Jahamunna A A Barbosa1, Ariana Zoppi2, Mario A Quevedo3, Polyanne N de Melo4, Arthur S A de Medeiros5, Letícia Streck6, Alice R de Oliveira7, Matheus F Fernandes-Pedrosa8, Marcela R Longhi9, Arnóbio A da Silva-Júnior10.
Abstract
The interaction of methotrexate (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25257529 PMCID: PMC4200828 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150917077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Phase solubility diagrams of (a) Methotrexate (MTX) in different β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) concentrations; and (b) MTX in fixed 15 mM β-CD associated with different triethanolamine (TEA) concentrations.
Chemical shifts for protons of MTX and β-CD in different systems.
| Studied Protons | Free State (ppm) | Binary Complex (ppm) | Δδ (ppm) | Ternary Complex (ppm) | Δδ (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTX | |||||
| Ha | 8.6892 | 8.3530 | −0.3362 | 8.3677 | −0.3215 |
| Hc | 3.2404 | 3.4216 | 0.1812 | 3.3696 | 0.1292 |
| Hd | 6.9292 | 6.7362 | −0.1930 | 6.7828 | −0.1464 |
| He | 7.7425 | 7.7527 | 0.0102 | 7.7676 | 0.0251 |
| β-CD | |||||
| H1 | 5.0984 | 5.0875 | −0.0109 | 5.0845 | −0.0139 |
| H2 | 3.6778 | 3.6762 | −0.0016 | 3.6670 | −0.0108 |
| H3 | 3.9936 | 3.9065 | −0.0871 | 3.9416 | −0.0520 |
| H4 | 3.6118 | 3.6079 | −0.0039 | 3.6051 | −0.0067 |
| H5 | 3.9063 | 3.8395 | −0.0668 | 3.8103 | −0.0960 |
| H6 | 3.9063 | 3.8782 | −0.0281 | 3.8694 | −0.0369 |
Figure 2(a) Schematic representation of chemical structure and proton atom numbering scheme for MTX, β-CD and TEA; (b) 1H-NMR Spectra of MTX, binary MTX:β-CD complex, ternary MTX:β-CD:TEA complex and β-CD; (c) Partial contour plot of the 2D ROESY spectrum of (c) MTX:β-CD binary; and (d) MTX:β-CD:TEA ternary complexes (F1 β-CD protons and F2 MTX protons).
Figure 3Binding mode predicted by molecular docking assays of MTX to β-CD in (a) top view; (b) side view; and (c) rear view; (d) MTX:β-CD (cluster 1); (e) MTX:β-CD (cluster 2); and clusters of MTX:β-CD:TEA; (f) pose-1 and (g) pose-2.
Energetic decomposition analysis (MM-PBSA method) performed on the molecular dynamics trajectory for MTX:β-CD and MTX:β-CD:TEA complexes.
| Energetic Component | Value (kcal·mol−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Binary Complex | Ternary Complex | |
| Electrostatic | −30.07 | −220.22 |
| Van der Waals | −33.20 | −30.09 |
| Total Gas Energy | −63.27 | −250.30 |
| Solvation Energy | 43.76 | 217.87 |
| Estimated ∆ | −19.50 | −32.43 |
Intermolecular MTX-β-CD interactions with occupancy (%) in the overall trajectory and average distance (Å) are informed.
| Atoms | Occupancy (%) | Average Distance (Å) |
|---|---|---|
| MTX(O3):β-CD (O-H6) | 24.54 | 2.68 (±0.11) |
| MTX(O4):β-CD (O-H6) | 15.80 | 2.65 (±0.15) |
| MTX(O2):β-CD (O-H6) | 5.52 | 2.70 (±0.12) |
| β-CD (O3):MTX (NH28) | 6.35 | 2.88 (±0.08) |
C,H,N elementary analysis results.
| Sample | Theoretical %N from MTX | Analytical Content (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | N | ||
| MTX | 24.65 | 46.67 | 5.45 | 21.65 |
| β-CD | – | 38.01 | 6.78 | 0.01 |
| β-CD:MTX | 1.75% | 38.96 | 6.71 | 1.55 |
| β-CD:MTX:TEA | 1.80% | 40.65 | 6.77 | 2.74 |
Figure 4FTIR spectra of pure β-CD and MTX, physical mixtures and respective binary and ternary freeze-dried complexes.
Figure 5DSC and TG/DTG curves of β-CD, MTX, binary and ternary physical mixtures and binary (BC) and ternary (TC) freeze-dried complexes. Comparisons made for (a) binary complexes; and (b) ternary complexes.
Figure 6Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) β-CD; (b) MTX; (c) MTX:β-CD binary; and (d) MTX:β-CD:TEA ternary freeze-dried complexes.
Figure 7Dissolution studies for MTX, MTX:β-CD binary and MTX:β-CD:TEA ternary complexes.