| Literature DB >> 30487704 |
Qi-Xiong Qin1, Xue-Min Cheng1, Li-Zhi Lu1, Yun-Fei Wei2, Da-Cheng Wang3, Hai-Hua Li4, Guo-Hui Li5, Hong-Bin Liang6, Sheng-Yu Li7, Li Chen1, Zhi-Jian Liang8.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the specific biomarkers and potential pathogenesis of colorectal cancer-related ischemic stroke (CRCIS).Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Colorectal cancer; Ischemic stroke; Pathogenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30487704 PMCID: PMC6250925 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1Patient selection. CRC: Colorectal cancer.
Clinical characteristics of the patients
| Age | 65.33 ± 12.45 | 63.67 ± 9.18 | 0.748 |
| Gender | |||
| Male, | 78 (68.42) | 78 (68.42) | 1.000 |
| Female, | 36 (31.58) | 36 (31.58) | |
| Blood tests | |||
| WBC (109/L) | 7.71 ± 2.27 | 7.18 ± 1.97 | 0.058 |
| HGB (g/L) | 114.96 ± 23.09 | 122.57 ± 85.55 | 0.360 |
| PLT (109/L) | 242.28 ± 116.46 | 235.51 ± 82.35 | 0.613 |
| NC (109/L) | 5.65 ± 2.28 | 4.16 ± 1.49 | < 0.001 |
| PT (s) | 10.94 ± 1.40 | 10.82 ± 0.98 | 0.474 |
| INR | 0.95 ± 0.13 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 0.137 |
| APTT (s) | 29.52 ± 6.79 | 30.11 ± 6.20 | 0.496 |
| FIB (g/L) | 5.42 ± 4.42 | 5.32 ± 4.74 | 0.862 |
| D-dimer (μg/mL) | 1.40 ± 0.93 | 0.56 ± 0.47 | < 0.001 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 33.54 ± 35.50 | 28.79 ± 34.38 | 0.431 |
| CEA (U/mL) | 222.31 ± 175.85 | 88.48 ± 55.04 | < 0.001 |
| CA125 (U/mL) | 47.13 ± 54.32 | 22.70 ± 34.61 | < 0.001 |
| CA199 (U/mL) | 293.41 ± 1428.18 | 24.83 ± 34.212 | 0.066 |
| Type of CRC | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 107 | 110 | 0.235 |
| Nonadenocarcinoma | 7 | 4 | |
| Systemic metastasis, | 0.080 | ||
| Yes | 74 (64.9) | 61 (53.5) | |
| No | 40 (35.1) | 53 (46.5) | |
| Methods of therapy, | |||
| Surgery | 76 (66.7) | 87 (76.3) | 0.107 |
| Chemotherapy | 46 (40.4) | 33 (28.9) | 0.070 |
| No treatment | 28 (24.6) | 24 (21.2) | 0.528 |
With two independent samples t-test;
With chi-square test. CRCIS: Colorectal cancer related-ischemic stroke; CRC: Colorectal cancer; WBC: White blood cell; HGB: Hemoglobin; PLT: Platelet; NC: Neutrophil count; PT: Prothrombin time; INR: International normalized ratio; APTT: Activated partial thromboplastin time; FIB: Fibrinogen; CRP: C-reactive protein; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; CA: Cancer antigen.
Data of ischemic stroke onset, n (%)
| IS lesion pattern | |
| Single arterial lesion | 43 (37.72) |
| Multiple arterial lesions | 71 (62.28) |
| NIHSS scores at the day of IS onset | |
| 0-5 | 31 (27.19) |
| 6-15 | 66 (57.90) |
| 16-20 | 13 (11.40) |
| > 20 | 4 (3.51) |
| Time interval between CRC diagnosis and IS onset | |
| IS as the first manifestation of CRC | 22 (19.30) |
| IS onset after CRC diagnosis | |
| 0-6 mo | 60 (52.63) |
| 7-12 mo | 19 (16.67) |
| > 12 mo | 13 (11.40) |
IS: Ischemic stroke; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; CRC: Colorectal cancer.
Figure 2Typical presentation of ischemic stroke in a colorectal cancer patient without conventional stroke mechanism. A 47-year-old male patient experienced acute ischemic stroke in the first 3 mo after diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging showed high signal changes in the middle cerebral and anterior cerebral and anterior choroidal arteries. Echocardiography results were normal.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis
| D-dimer | 0.002 | 0.001 | 26.660 | 1 | < 0.001 | 1.002 | 1.001-1.003 |
| NC | 0.486 | 0.127 | 14.617 | 1 | < 0.001 | 1.626 | 1.268-2.087 |
| CEA | 0.011 | 0.002 | 20.104 | 1 | < 0.001 | 1.011 | 1.006-1.015 |
| CA125 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 2.595 | 1 | 0.107 | 1.007 | 0.998-1.016 |
| Constant | -5.843 | 0.866 | 45.484 | 1 | < 0.001 | 0.003 |
NC: Neutrophil count; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; CA125: Cancer antigen 125; SE: Standard error; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis of the product of D-dimer, carcinoembryonic antigen, and neutrophil count. The area under the curve of the products was 0.889 ± 0.022 (95%CI: 0.847-0.932, P < 0.001). The optimum cut-off point was 252.06. At this cut-off value, the sensitivity was 86.0% and the specificity was 79.8%. CI: Confidence interval; ROC: Receiver operator characteristic.