| Literature DB >> 30487425 |
Jiewen Yang1, Yangfeng Guo2, Xueying Du3, Yi Jiang4, Wanxin Wang5, Di Xiao6, Tian Wang7, Ciyong Lu8, Lan Guo9.
Abstract
Use of the Internet has become an integral part of daily life. Adolescents are especially at a higher risk of developing problematic Internet use (PIU). Although one of the most well-known comorbid conditions of PIU is sleep disturbance, little is known about the sex disparity in this association. This school-based survey in students of grades 7⁻9 was conducted to estimate the prevalence of PIU and sleep disturbance among Chinese adolescents, to test the association between PIU and sleep disturbance, and to investigate the role of the child's sex in this association. A two-stage stratified cluster sampling method was used to recruit participants, and two-level logistic regression models were fitted. The mean Internet addiction test score was 37.2 (SD: 13.2), and 15.5% (736) met the criteria for PIU. After adjusting for control variables, problematic Internet users were at a higher risk of sleep disturbance (adjusted odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.07⁻3.19). Sex-stratified analyses also demonstrated that association was greater in girls than boys. In this respect, paying more attention to the sleep patterns of adolescents who report excessive Internet use is recommended, and this early identification may be of practical importance for schools, parents, and adolescents themselves.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; problematic Internet use; sex difference; sleep disturbance
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30487425 PMCID: PMC6313705 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15122682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Sample characteristics stratified by sex.
| Variable | Total (%) | Boys (%) | Girls (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 4750 (100) | 2335 (49.2) | 2415 (50.8) | 0.151 |
| Age, mean (SD) | 16.0 (1.5) | 15.99 (1.5) | 16.1 (1.5) | |
| Ethnicity | 0.492 | |||
| Han | 4361 (91.8) | 2137 (91.5) | 2224 (92.1) | |
| Other ethnic groups | 389 (8.2) | 198 (8.5) | 191 (7.9) | |
| HSS | <0.001 | |||
| Above average | 1583 (33.3) | 764 (32.7) | 819 (33.9) | |
| Average | 2802 (59.0) | 1340 (57.4) | 1462 (60.5) | |
| Below average | 306 (6.4) | 205 (8.8) | 101 (4.2) | |
| Missing data | 59 (1.2) | 26 (1.1) | 33 (1.4) | |
| Academic pressure | <0.001 | |||
| Above average | 2424 (51.0) | 1225 (52.5) | 1199(49.6) | |
| Average | 2073 (43.6) | 955 (40.9) | 1118 (46.3) | |
| Below average | 229 (4.8) | 141 (6.0) | 88 (3.6) | |
| Missing data | 24 (0.5) | 14 (0.6) | 10 (0.4) | |
| Weight status | <0.001 | |||
| Normal | 4027 (84.8) | 1850 (79.2) | 2177 (90.1) | |
| Overweight or obese | 723 (15.2) | 485 (20.8) | 238 (9.9) | |
| Daily hours of outdoor activity | <0.001 | |||
| Less than 2 h | 3315 (69.8) | 1463 (62.7) | 1852 (76.7) | |
| 2–3 h | 731 (15.4) | 428 (18.3) | 303 (12.5) | |
| More than 3 h | 536 (11.3) | 347 (14.9) | 189 (7.8) | |
| Missing data | 168 (3.5) | 97 (4.2) | 71 (2.9) | |
| IAT scores, mean (SD) | 37.2 (13.2) | 38.5 (13.9) | 35.9 (12.4) | <0.001 |
| Problem Internet use | <0.001 | |||
| No | 4014 (84.5) | 1906 (81.6) | 2108 (87.3) | |
| Yes | 736 (15.5) | 429 (18.4) | 307 (12.7) | |
| Total PSQI scores, mean (SD) | 6.8 (3.5) | 6.6 (3.7) | 7.0 (3.2) | |
| Sleep disturbance | <0.001 | |||
| No | 2892 (60.9) | 1494 (64.0) | 1398 (57.9) | |
| Yes | 1858 (39.1) | 841 (36.0) | 1017 (42.1) |
Abbreviations: HSS, household socioeconomic status; SD, standard deviation; IAT, Young’s Internet Addiction Test. Chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables, and t tests were used for age data, IAT scores, and total Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores.
Unadjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval of sleep disturbance among adolescents: two-level logistic regression analyses.
| Variable | Sleep Disturbance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total, OR (95% CI) | Boys, OR (95% CI) | Girls, OR (95% CI) | ||||
| PIU (Ref. = No) | ||||||
| Yes | 2.57 (2.13–3.09) | <0.001 | 2.36 (1.85–3.02) | <0.001 | 3.15 (2.34–4.24) | <0.001 |
| Age (1-year increase) | 1.42 (1.35–1.48) | <0.001 | 1.48 (1.39–1.59) | <0.001 | 1.36 (1.28–1.44) | <0.001 |
| Ethnicity (Ref. = Other ethnic groups) | 1.29 (1.02–1.63) | 0.038 | 1.30 (0.92–1.83) | 0.139 | 1.28 (0.92–1.77) | 0.146 |
| HSS (Ref. = Above average) | ||||||
| Average | 1.63 (1.42–1.87) | <0.001 | 1.81 (1.48–2.21) | <0.001 | 1.48 (0.94–2.34) | 0.091 |
| Below average | 2.35 (1.78–3.12) | <0.001 | 3.41 (2.37–4.91) | <0.001 | 1.48 (1.23–1.79) | <0.001 |
| Academic pressure (Ref. = Above average) | ||||||
| Average | 0.52 (0.46–0.59) | <0.001 | 0.47 (0.38–0.57) | <0.001 | 0.56 (0.47–0.67) | <0.001 |
| Below average | 0.56 (0.41–0.76) | <0.001 | 0.59 (0.39–0.87) | 0.008 | 0.55 (0.34–0.89) | 0.015 |
| Weight status (Ref. = Normal) | ||||||
| Overweight or Obese | 0.86 (0.72–1.02) | 0.081 | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) | 0.504 | 0.86 (0.64–1.15) | 0.294 |
| Daily hours of outdoor activity (Ref. = Less than 2 h) | ||||||
| 2–3 h | 0.95 (0.79–1.13) | 0.545 | 0.98 (0.78–1.25) | 0.897 | 0.97 (0.75–1.27) | 0.826 |
| More than 3 h | 0.91 (0.74–1.12) | 0.380 | 0.87 (0.67–1.14) | 0.309 | 1.13 (0.81–1.57) | 0.484 |
Abbreviations: HSS, household socioeconomic status; PIU, problematic Internet use; Ref., reference; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Associations of the interaction item with sleep disturbance: a two-level multivariate logistic regression model *.
| Variable | Sleep Disturbance | |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | ||
| Sex * PIU (Interaction item) | 1.48 (1.12–2.20) | 0.031 |
| PIU (Ref. = No) | ||
| Yes | 2.14 (1.67–2.75) | <0.001 |
| Sex (Ref. = Boys) | 1.32 (1.14–1.52) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: PIU, problematic Internet use; Ref., reference; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. *: The child’s sex, PIU, the interaction item between sex and PIU, ethnicity, HSS, and academic pressure in the two-level multivariate logistic regression model.
Figure 1Adjusted association between problematic Internet use (PIU) and sleep disturbance: stratified by sex.