| Literature DB >> 31249504 |
Pin-Hsuan Lin1, Ya-Chen Lee2, Kai-Li Chen3, Pei-Lun Hsieh4, Shang-Yu Yang2, Ying-Lien Lin5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over 40% of Taiwanese College students experience sleep problems that not only impair their quality of life but also contribute to psychosomatic disorders. Of all the factors affecting the sleep quality, internet surfing is among one of the most prevalent. Female college students are more vulnerable to internet-associated sleep disorders than their male counterparts. Therefore, this study aims to investigate (1) the relationship between internet addiction and sleep quality, and (2) whether significant variations in sleep quality exist among students with different degrees of internet use.Entities:
Keywords: Internet Addiction Test; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; college students; internet dependence; sleep quality
Year: 2019 PMID: 31249504 PMCID: PMC6582255 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle characteristics as well as sleep quality and level of internet addiction.
| Sleep quality | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Good ( | Poor ( | ||
| Age (mean ± SD) | 17.30 ± 1.34 | 17.31 ± 1.31 | 17.29 ± 1.36 | 0.83b |
| BMI (mean ± SD) | 20.57 ± 4.08 | 20.30 ± 3.45 | 20.79 ± 4.54 | 0.18b |
| 0.01a,∗ | ||||
| No | 482 (95.80%) | 225 (98.30%) | 257 (93.80%) | |
| Yes | 21 (4.20%) | 4 (1.70%) | 17 (6.20%) | |
| 0.05a | ||||
| No | 485 (96.40%) | 225 (98.30%) | 260 (94.90%) | |
| Yes | 18 (3.60%) | 4 (1.70%) | 14 (5.10%) | |
| 0.42a | ||||
| No | 258 (51.30%) | 122 (53.30%) | 136 (49.60%) | |
| Yes | 245 (48.70%) | 107 (46.70%) | 138 (50.40%) | |
| 0.67a | ||||
| No | 22 (4.40%) | 11 (4.80%) | 11 (4.00%) | |
| Yes | 481 (95.60%) | 218 (95.20%) | 263 (96.00%) | |
| Normal | 164 (32.60%) | 102 (44.50%) | 62 (22.60%) | <0.01a∗ |
| Mild | 265 (52.70%) | 103 (45.00%) | 162 (59.10%) | |
| Moderate | 70 (13.90%) | 22 (9.60%) | 48 (17.50%) | |
| Severe | 4 (0.80%) | 2 (0.90%) | 2 (0.70%) | |
| Total score | 37.34 ± 12.00 | 34.34 ± 11.32 | 39.85 ± 11.99 | <0.01b∗ |
| Salience | 7.58 ± 3.10 | 6.70 ± 2.87 | 8.32 ± 3.10 | <0.01b∗ |
| Excessive use | 10.22 ± 3.36 | 9.34 ± 3.09 | 10.96 ± 3.41 | <0.01b∗ |
| Neglect of work | 4.78 ± 1.86 | 4.61 ± 1.86 | 4.92 ± 1.84 | 0.06 |
| Anticipation | 3.64 ± 1.51 | 3.42 ± 1.38 | 3.82 ± 1.58 | <0.01b∗ |
| Lack of control | 5.66 ± 2.18 | 5.16 ± 2.05 | 6.08 ± 2.20 | <0.01b∗ |
| Neglect of social life | 4.20 ± 1.71 | 3.88 ± 1.61 | 4.47 ± 1.75 | <0.01b∗ |
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) total scores and scores on its different components in students with different degrees of internet addiction.
| Normal (a) | Mild (b) | Moderate to severe (c) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Components | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Tukey | |
| Total score | 4.97 | 2.90 | 6.49 | 2.94 | 6.85 | 2.91 | <0.01∗ | (c) > (b) > (a) |
| Subjective sleep quality | 0.94 | 0.80 | 1.24 | 0.78 | 1.28 | 0.77 | <0.01∗ | (c) > (b) > (a) |
| Sleep latency | 0.72 | 0.78 | 1.15 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.89 | <0.01∗ | (c) > (b) > (a) |
| Sleep duration | 0.81 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.14 | 1.04 | 0.04∗ | (c) > (a) |
| Habitual sleep efficiency | 0.18 | 0.50 | 0.23 | 0.63 | 0.26 | 0.62 | 0.56 | – |
| Sleep disturbance | 0.93 | 0.58 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 1.14 | 0.58 | <0.01∗ | (b) > (a); (c) > (a) |
| Use of sleep medication | 0.06 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.02∗ | (c) > (b); (c) > (a) |
| Daytime dysfunction | 1.34 | 0.92 | 1.62 | 0.85 | 1.82 | 0.80 | <0.01∗ | (b) > (a); (c) > (a) |
Regression coefficients from multiple regression analysis on associations of the six patterns of symptoms in Internet Addiction Test (IAT) with the seven items on sleep quality in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)†.
| PSQI IAT | Total score | Subjective sleep quality | Sleep latency | Sleep duration | Habitual sleep efficiency | Sleep disturbance | Use of sleep medication | Daytime dysfunction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total score | 0.06∗∗ | 0.01∗∗ | 0.01∗∗ | 0.01∗ | <0.01 | 0.01∗∗ | 0.01∗∗ | 0.02∗∗ |
| Salience | 0.30∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.02 | 0.04∗∗ | 0.02∗∗ | 0.07∗∗ |
| Excessive use | 0.20∗∗ | 0.03∗∗ | 0.03∗∗ | 0.03∗∗ | 0.01 | 0.02∗∗ | 0.02∗∗ | 0.06∗∗ |
| Neglect of work | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05∗∗ | 0.03 |
| Anticipation | 0.27∗∗ | 0.03 | 0.06∗ | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05∗∗ | 0.03∗ | 0.07∗∗ |
| Lack of control | 0.31∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.05∗∗ | 0.05∗ | 0.02 | 0.05∗∗ | 0.02 | 0.08∗∗ |
| Neglect of social life | 0.25∗∗ | 0.05∗ | 0.04 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06∗∗ |
Logistic regression analysis on association between scores on Internet Addiction Test (IAT) and sleep quality†.
| Item | B | S.E. | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total score | 0.04 | 0.01 | 1.05 (1.03 – 1.06) | <0.01∗ |
| Salience | 0.20 | 0.04 | 1.22 (1.14 – 1.30) | <0.01∗ |
| Excessive use | 0.16 | 0.03 | 1.17 (1.10 – 1.25) | <0.01∗ |
| Neglect of work | 0.09 | 0.05 | 1.10 (0.99 – 1.21) | 0.07 |
| Anticipation | 0.19 | 0.06 | 1.21 (1.07 – 1.38) | <0.01∗ |
| Lack of control | 0.22 | 0.05 | 1.24 (1.13 – 1.36) | <0.01∗ |
| Neglect of social life | 0.22 | 0.06 | 1.24 (1.11 – 1.39) | <0.01∗ |