Literature DB >> 10975360

Motion perception at scotopic light levels.

K R Gegenfurtner1, H M Mayser, L T Sharpe.   

Abstract

Although the spatial and temporal properties of rod-mediated vision have been extensively characterized, little is known about scotopic motion perception. To provide such information, we determined thresholds for the detection and identification of the direction of motion of sinusoidal grating patches moving at speeds from 1 to 32 deg/s, under scotopic light levels, in four different types of observers: three normals, a rod monochromat (who lacks all cone vision), an S-cone monochromat (who lacks M- and L-cone vision), and four deuteranopes (who lack M-cone vision). The deuteranopes, whose motion perception does not differ from that of normals, allowed us to measure rod and L-cone thresholds under silent substitution conditions and to compare directly the perceived velocity for moving stimuli detected by either rod or cone vision at the same light level. We find, for rod as for cone vision, that the direction of motion can be reliably identified very near to detection threshold. In contrast, the perceived velocity of rod-mediated stimuli is reduced by approximately 20% relative to cone-mediated stimuli at temporal frequencies below 4 Hz and at all intensity levels investigated (0.92 to -1.12 log cd m(-2)). Most likely, the difference in velocity perception is distal in origin because rod and cone signals converge in the retina and further processing of their combined signals in the visual cortex is presumably identical. To account for the difference, we propose a model of velocity, in which the greater temporal averaging of rod signals in the retina leads to an attenuation of the motion signal in the detectors tuned to high velocities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10975360     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.17.001505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  9 in total

1.  Photopic and scotopic VEPs in patients with congenital stationary night-blindness.

Authors:  Zuzana Kubová; Jan Kremlácek; Miroslav Kuba; Jana Chlubnová; Jaromir Sverák
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Visual motion detection in hierarchical spatial frames of reference.

Authors:  Alexander Sokolov; Marina Pavlova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Fang Jiang; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Arnold J Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Temporal resolution of single-photon responses in primate rod photoreceptors and limits imposed by cellular noise.

Authors:  Greg D Field; Valerie Uzzell; E J Chichilnisky; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Apparent speed increases at low luminance.

Authors:  Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Pink Cricket Balls May Be Visually Challenging at Sunset.

Authors:  Joshua M Adie; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-02-01

8.  Suprathreshold Motion Perception in Anisometropic Amblyopia: Interocular Speed Matching and the Pulfrich Effect.

Authors:  Goro Maehara; Syunsuke Araki; Tsuyoshi Yoneda; Benjamin Thompson; Atsushi Miki
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Pupillary response to moving stimuli of different speeds.

Authors:  Yuexin Wang; Yining Guo; Jiajia Wang; Ziyuan Liu; Xuemin Li
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.349

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.