Literature DB >> 30478050

Scientific communication in a post-truth society.

Shanto Iyengar1, Douglas S Massey2.   

Abstract

Within the scientific community, much attention has focused on improving communications between scientists, policy makers, and the public. To date, efforts have centered on improving the content, accessibility, and delivery of scientific communications. Here we argue that in the current political and media environment faulty communication is no longer the core of the problem. Distrust in the scientific enterprise and misperceptions of scientific knowledge increasingly stem less from problems of communication and more from the widespread dissemination of misleading and biased information. We describe the profound structural shifts in the media environment that have occurred in recent decades and their connection to public policy decisions and technological changes. We explain how these shifts have enabled unscrupulous actors with ulterior motives increasingly to circulate fake news, misinformation, and disinformation with the help of trolls, bots, and respondent-driven algorithms. We document the high degree of partisan animosity, implicit ideological bias, political polarization, and politically motivated reasoning that now prevail in the public sphere and offer an actual example of how clearly stated scientific conclusions can be systematically perverted in the media through an internet-based campaign of disinformation and misinformation. We suggest that, in addition to attending to the clarity of their communications, scientists must also develop online strategies to counteract campaigns of misinformation and disinformation that will inevitably follow the release of findings threatening to partisans on either end of the political spectrum.

Keywords:  bias; communication; media; politics; science

Year:  2018        PMID: 30478050      PMCID: PMC6475392          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

Review 1.  The case for motivated reasoning.

Authors:  Z Kunda
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.

Authors:  Eytan Bakshy; Solomon Messing; Lada A Adamic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; D E McGhee; J L Schwartz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-06

4.  The science of fake news.

Authors:  David M J Lazer; Matthew A Baum; Yochai Benkler; Adam J Berinsky; Kelly M Greenhill; Filippo Menczer; Miriam J Metzger; Brendan Nyhan; Gordon Pennycook; David Rothschild; Michael Schudson; Steven A Sloman; Cass R Sunstein; Emily A Thorson; Duncan J Watts; Jonathan L Zittrain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States.

Authors:  Douglas S Massey; Jonathan Rothwell; Thurston Domina
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2009-11-01
  5 in total
  23 in total

1.  The Science of Science Communication III.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Speaking my truth: Why personal experiences can bridge divides but mislead.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Diego A Reinero; Victoria Spring; Elizabeth A Harris; Annie Duke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences-Its evolution and adaptation.

Authors:  May R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Interventions to reduce partisan animosity.

Authors:  Rachel Hartman; Will Blakey; Jake Womick; Chris Bail; Eli J Finkel; Hahrie Han; John Sarrouf; Juliana Schroeder; Paschal Sheeran; Jay J Van Bavel; Robb Willer; Kurt Gray
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-09-19

5.  Preventive Medicine for Person, Place, and Planet: Revisiting the Concept of High-Level Wellness in the Planetary Health Paradigm.

Authors:  Susan L Prescott; Alan C Logan; David L Katz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Advanced approaches for a better understanding of scientific knowledge transfer in forest and forest-related policy.

Authors:  Michael Böcher
Journal:  For Policy Econ       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  Conversations Surrounding the Use of DNA Tests in the Family Reunification of Migrants Separated at the United States-Mexico Border in 2018.

Authors:  Jennifer K Wagner; Diana Madden; Valedie Oray; Sara H Katsanis
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Web of lies: a tool for determining the limits of verification in preventing the spread of false information on networks.

Authors:  Kinga Makovi; Manuel Muñoz-Herrera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Transparency of informed consent in pilot and feasibility studies is inadequate: a single-center quality assurance study.

Authors:  Mohammed I U Khan; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Matthew Holek; Faris Bdair; Zoha H Durrani; Katie Mellor; Saskia Eddy; Sandra M Eldridge; Claire L Chan; Michael J Campbell; Christine M Bond; Sally Hopewell; Gillian A Lancaster; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-04-16

10.  Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media.

Authors:  Curtis Martin; Bertrum H MacDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.