Literature DB >> 30472061

Crowdsourced Assessment of Inanimate Biotissue Drills: A Valid and Cost-Effective Way to Evaluate Surgical Trainees.

MaryJoe K Rice1, Mazen S Zenati2, Stephanie M Novak3, Amr I Al Abbas4, Amer H Zureikat4, Herbert J Zeh5, Melissa E Hogg6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Providing feedback to surgical trainees is a critical component for assessment of technical skills, yet remains costly and time consuming. We hypothesize that statistical selection can identify a homogenous group of nonexpert crowdworkers capable of accurately grading inanimate surgical video.
DESIGN: Applicants auditioned by grading 9 training videos using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool and an error-based checklist. The summed OSATS, summed errors, and OSATS summary score were tested for outliers using Cronbach's Alpha and single measure intraclass correlation. Accepted crowdworkers then submitted grades for videos in 3 different compositions: full video 1× speed, full video 2× speed, and critical section segmented video. Graders were blinded to this study and a similar statistical analysis was performed.
SETTING: The study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Pittsburgh, PA), a tertiary care academic teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six premedical students participated as crowdworker applicants and 2 surgery experts were compared as the gold-standard.
RESULTS: The selected hire intraclass correlation was 0.717 for Total Errors and 0.794 for Total OSATS for the first hire group and 0.800 for Total OSATS and 0.654 for Total Errors for the second hire group. There was very good correlation between full videos at 1× and 2× speed with an interitem statistic of 0.817 for errors and 0.86 for OSATS. Only moderate correlation was found with critical section segments. In 1 year 275hours of inanimate video was graded costing $22.27/video or $1.03/minute.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistical selection can be used to identify a homogenous cohort of crowdworkers used for grading trainees' inanimate drills. Crowdworkers can distinguish OSATS metrics and errors in full videos at 2× speed but were less consistent with segmented videos. The program is a comparatively cost-effective way to provide feedback to surgical trainees.
Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotissue; CS; Crowdsource; GJ; HJ; HPB; IHJ; OSATS; Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills; PJ; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Robotic surgery; Surgical education; critical section; gastrojejunostomy; hepaticojejunostomy; hepatobiliary; interrupted hepaticojejunostomy; pancreaticojejunostomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30472061     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  6 in total

Review 1.  State of the art robotic distal pancreatectomy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Amr I Al Abbas; Herbert J Zeh Iii; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 2.  Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Vining; Kinga B Skowron; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-23

3.  Association of Mentorship and a Formal Robotic Proficiency Skills Curriculum With Subsequent Generations' Learning Curve and Safety for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  MaryJoe K Rice; Jacob C Hodges; Johanna Bellon; Jeffrey Borrebach; Amr I Al Abbas; Ahmad Hamad; L Mark Knab; A James Moser; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies: One Decade of Optimizing Performance.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Joal D Beane; Mazen S Zenati; Amr I Al Abbas; Brian A Boone; A James Moser; David L Bartlett; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 13.787

5.  Will It Play in Peoria? A Pilot Study of a Robotic Skills Curriculum for Surgical Oncology Fellows.

Authors:  Sarwat B Ahmad; MaryJoe Rice; Cecilia Chang; Ahmad Hamad; T Peter Kingham; Jin He; Jose M Pimiento; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Research Hotspots and Trend Exploration on the Clinical Translational Outcome of Simulation-Based Medical Education: A 10-Year Scientific Bibliometric Analysis From 2011 to 2021.

Authors:  Shun Yao; Yabin Tang; Chenyue Yi; Yao Xiao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.