Literature DB >> 30471685

Phase Separation of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Ammon E Posey1, Alex S Holehouse1, Rohit V Pappu2.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in the topic of intracellular phase transitions that lead to the formation of biologically regulated biomolecular condensates. These condensates are membraneless bodies formed by phase separation of key protein and nucleic acid molecules from the cytoplasmic or nucleoplasmic milieus. The drivers of phase separation are referred to as scaffolds whereas molecules that preferentially partition into condensates formed by scaffolds are known as clients. Recent advances have shown that it is possible to generate physical and functional facsimiles of many biomolecular condensates in vitro. This is achieved by titrating the concentration of key scaffold proteins and solution parameters such as salt concentration, pH, or temperature. The ability to reproduce phase separation in vitro allows one to compare the relationships between information encoded in the sequences of scaffold proteins and the driving forces for phase separation. Many scaffold proteins include intrinsically disordered regions whereas others are entirely disordered. Our focus is on comparative assessments of phase separation for different scaffold proteins, specifically intrinsically disordered linear multivalent proteins. We highlight the importance of coexistence curves known as binodals for quantifying phase behavior and comparing driving forces for sequence-specific phase separation. We describe the information accessible from full binodals and highlight different methods for-and challenges associated with-mapping binodals. In essence, we provide a wish list for in vitro characterization of phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins. Fulfillment of this wish list through key advances in experiment, computation, and theory should bring us closer to being able to predict in vitro phase behavior for scaffold proteins and connect this to the functions and features of biomolecular condensates.
© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binodal; Coexistence curve; Intrinsically disordered proteins; Multivalency; Phase separation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30471685     DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  42 in total

1.  Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains.

Authors:  Erik W Martin; Alex S Holehouse; Ivan Peran; Mina Farag; J Jeremias Incicco; Anne Bremer; Christy R Grace; Andrea Soranno; Rohit V Pappu; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Emerging Roles for Phase Separation in Plants.

Authors:  Ryan J Emenecker; Alex S Holehouse; Lucia C Strader
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Ubiquitin-Modulated Phase Separation of Shuttle Proteins: Does Condensate Formation Promote Protein Degradation?

Authors:  Thuy P Dao; Carlos A Castañeda
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 4.  Structure, dynamics and functions of UBQLNs: at the crossroads of protein quality control machinery.

Authors:  Tongyin Zheng; Yiran Yang; Carlos A Castañeda
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  Biomolecular Condensates and Cancer.

Authors:  Ann Boija; Isaac A Klein; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Charge-driven condensation of RNA and proteins suggests broad role of phase separation in cytoplasmic environments.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Grzegorz Nawrocki; Joyce Goodluck; Ali Akbar Ashkarran; Charles G Hoogstraten; Lisa J Lapidus; Michael Feig
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  α-Synuclein aggregation nucleates through liquid-liquid phase separation.

Authors:  Soumik Ray; Nitu Singh; Rakesh Kumar; Komal Patel; Satyaprakash Pandey; Debalina Datta; Jaladhar Mahato; Rajlaxmi Panigrahi; Ambuja Navalkar; Surabhi Mehra; Laxmikant Gadhe; Debdeep Chatterjee; Ajay Singh Sawner; Siddhartha Maiti; Sandhya Bhatia; Juan Atilio Gerez; Arindam Chowdhury; Ashutosh Kumar; Ranjith Padinhateeri; Roland Riek; G Krishnamoorthy; Samir K Maji
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 24.427

8.  Sequence determinants of in cell condensate morphology, dynamics, and oligomerization as measured by number and brightness analysis.

Authors:  Ryan J Emenecker; Alex S Holehouse; Lucia C Strader
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 9.  Low complexity domains, condensates, and stem cell pluripotency.

Authors:  Munender Vodnala; Eun-Bee Choi; Yick W Fong
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 10.  Post-Translational Modifications Modulate Proteinopathies of TDP-43, FUS and hnRNP-A/B in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Stefania Farina; Francesca Esposito; Martina Battistoni; Giuseppe Biamonti; Sofia Francia
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.