Literature DB >> 30471462

Supervised learning for bone shape and cortical thickness estimation from CT images for finite element analysis.

Vimal Chandran1, Ghislain Maquer2, Thomas Gerig3, Philippe Zysset2, Mauricio Reyes4.   

Abstract

Knowledge about the thickness of the cortical bone is of high interest for fracture risk assessment. Most finite element model solutions overlook this information because of the coarse resolution of the CT images. To circumvent this limitation, a three-steps approach is proposed. 1) Two initial surface meshes approximating the outer and inner cortical surfaces are generated via a shape regression based on morphometric features and statistical shape model parameters. 2) The meshes are then corrected locally using a supervised learning model build from image features extracted from pairs of QCT (0.3-1 mm resolution) and HRpQCT images (82 µm resolution). As the resulting meshes better follow the cortical surfaces, the cortical thickness can be estimated at sub-voxel precision. 3) The meshes are finally regularized by a Gaussian process model featuring a two-kernel model, which seamlessly enables smoothness and shape-awareness priors during regularization. The resulting meshes yield high-quality mesh element properties, suitable for construction of tetrahedral meshes and finite element simulations. This pipeline was applied to 36 pairs of proximal femurs (17 males, 19 females, 76 ± 12 years) scanned under QCT and HRpQCT modalities. On a set of leave-one-out experiments, we quantified accuracy (root mean square error = 0.36 ± 0.29 mm) and robustness (Hausdorff distance = 3.90 ± 1.57 mm) of the outer surface meshes. The error in the estimated cortical thickness (0.05 ± 0.40 mm), and the tetrahedral mesh quality (aspect ratio = 1.4 ± 0.02) are also reported. The proposed pipeline produces finite element meshes with patient-specific bone shape and sub-voxel cortical thickness directly from CT scans. It also ensures that the nodes and elements numbering remains consistent and independent of the morphology, which is a distinct advantage in population studies.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical thickness; Finite elements; Gaussian process model; Hip fracture; Shape regression; Super resolution

Year:  2018        PMID: 30471462     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  5 in total

1.  Measuring the thickness of vertebral endplate and shell using digital tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Michael R Dix; Angela Xiao; Daniel J Oravec; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.

Authors:  Enrico Schileo; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  A Review of CT-Based Fracture Risk Assessment with Finite Element Modeling and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ingmar Fleps; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.163

4.  In Silico Clinical Trials in the Orthopedic Device Industry: From Fantasy to Reality?

Authors:  Philippe Favre; Ghislain Maquer; Adam Henderson; Daniel Hertig; Daniel Ciric; Jeffrey E Bischoff
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Statistical Shape and Appearance Models: Development Towards Improved Osteoporosis Care.

Authors:  Lorenzo Grassi; Sami P Väänänen; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.