| Literature DB >> 30470177 |
Ginette Irma Kame-Ngasse1, Flobert Njiokou2, Tito Trésor Melachio-Tanekou3, Oumarou Farikou4, Gustave Simo5, Anne Geiger6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tsetse flies are vectors of human and animal African trypanosomiasis. In spite of many decades of chemotherapy and vector control, the disease has not been eradicated. Other methods like the transformation of tsetse fly symbionts to render the fly refractory to trypanosome infection are being evaluated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between trypanosome infections and the presence of symbionts in these tsetse species. Tsetse flies were trapped in two villages of the "Faro and Déo" Division of the Adamawa region of Cameroon. In the field, tsetse fly species were identified and their infection by trypanosomes was checked by microscopy. In the laboratory, DNA was extracted from their midguts and the presence of symbionts (Sodalis glossinidius and Wolbachia sp.) and trypanosomes was checked by PCR. Symbionts/trypanosomes association tests were performed.Entities:
Keywords: Animal African trypanosomiasis; Cameroon; Symbionts; Tripartite interactions; Trypanosoma spp.; Tsetse flies; “Faro and Déo” division
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30470177 PMCID: PMC6251084 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-018-1286-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Sampling sites in the Animal African Trypanosomiasis focus of Dodeo
Primers used for PCR amplification of trypanosome and bacteria DNA
| Specificity | Primer sequence (5′— 3′) | Name | Amplified product (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TGAAGTTGGGAATGTCG | pSG2 | 120 | (Darby et al., 2005) [ |
| YATACCTATTCGAAGGGATAG | 16S rRNA | 438 | (Werren and Windsor, 2000) [ | |
| GTCCAATARSTGATGARGAAAC | wsp | 513 | (Baldo et al., 2006) [ | |
|
| TCGAGCGAGAACGGGCACTTTGCGA | TcS | 341 | (Moser et al., 1989) [ |
|
| GGACACGCCAGAAGGTACTT | TcF | 350 | (Masiga et al., 1992) [ |
|
| CGAATGAATATTAAACAATGCGCAG | Tbr | 164 | (Masiga et al., 1992) [ |
|
| CTGAGTGCTCCATGTGCCAC | Tvw | 150 | (Masiga et al., 1992 |
|
| TGGACTTCGGATTAAGTACAACA | Diag | 150–400 | (Dyer et al., 2008) [ |
Results of the entomological survey
| Focus | Survey villages | No. traps | No. captured flies | ADT | No. teneral flies (%) | No. dissected flies | No. infected flies (light microscopy) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodéo | Mayo-Dagoum | 56 | 220 | 0.785 | 17 (7.72) | 126 | 2 (1.58) |
| Golde Bourle | 30 | 226 | 1.501 | 13 (5.75) | 186 | 1 (0.52) | |
| Total | 86 | 446 | 1.037 | 30 (6.72) | 312 | 3 (0.95) |
No. number of, ADT apparent density per trap per day
Trypanosome infection rates and symbiont occurrence rates in Glossina tachinoides
| Villages | No. samples | S. g. (%) | W. sp. (%) | Tb s.l. (%) | TcF (%) | TcS (%) | Simple infections (%) | TcS/TcF (%) | TcS/ Tb s.l. (%) | TcF/ Tb s.l. (%) | TcS/TcF/ Tb s.l. (%) | Mixed-infections (%) | Global infection (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo-Dagoum | 109 | 50 (45.9) | 75 (68.8) | 14 (12.8) | 1 (0.9) | 5 (4.6) | 20 (18.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.8) | 2 (1.8) | 22 (20.2) |
| Golde Bourle | 161 | 50 (31.1) | 109 (67.7) | 16 (9.9) | 6 (4.1) | 32 (19.9) | 54 (33.5) | 13 (8.1) | 3 (1.7) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.6) | 18 (11.2) | 72 (44.7) |
| Total | 270 | 100 (37.0) | 184 (68.1) | 30 (11.1) | 7 (2.6) | 37 (13.7) | 74 (27.4) | 13 (4.8) | 3 (1.1) | 1 (0.4) | 3 (1.1) | 20 (7.4) | 94 (34.8) |
| Chi-square | / | 6.118 | 0.037 | 0.556 | Fisher exact test | 12.85 | 7.540 | 9.246 | Fisher exact test | Fisher exact test | Fisher exact test | 8.276 | 17.243 |
| / | 0.013 | 0.848 | 0.456 | 0.247 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.275 | 1.000 | 0.567 | 0.004 | < 0.0001 |
No. number of, S. g. Sodalis glossinidius, W. sp. Wolbachia sp., Tb s.l. T. brucei sensus lato, TcF T. congolense forest type, TcS T. congolense savannah type
Trypanosome infection rates and symbiont occurrence rates in Glossina morsitans submorsitans
| Villages | No. | Tb sl (%) | TcS (%) | TcF (%) | Twx (%) | Simple infections (%) | Mixed infections | Global infection (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TcS/TcF | TcS/Tbr | Tbr/TcF | ||||||||||
| Mayo-Dagoum | 16 | 7 (43.8) | 11 (68.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.3) | 1 (6.3) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 (18.8) |
| Golde Bourle | 26 | 5 (19.2) | 14 (53.9) | 7 (43.8) | 4 (15.4) | 1 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (46.2) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14 (53.8) |
| Total | 42 | 12 (28.6) | 25 (59.5) | 7 (16.7) | 4 (9.5) | 1 (2.4) | 1 (2.4) | 13 (31.0) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 17 (40.5) |
No. number of samples, Tb sl T. brucei sensus lato, TcF T. congolense forest type, TcS T. congolense savannah type, Twx Trypanosoma vivax
Relationship between the presence of Sodalis glossinidius and the flies’ infection by trypanosomes in G. tachinoides
| Combination symbiont/trypanosome | Probability values and odds ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
| S. vs Tb sl | 0.797 | 0.909 | [0.440–1.877] |
| W. vs Tb sl | 0.075 | 2.199 | [0.925–5.228] |
| S. vs TcF | 0.694 | 0.837 | [0.345–2.032] |
| W. vs TcF | 0.768 | 1.149 | [0.458–2.883] |
| S. vs TcS | 0.053 | 1.798 | [0.991–3.262] |
| W. vs TcS | 0.182 | 0.659 | [0.358–1.215] |
| S. vs All trypanosomes | 0.563 | 1.164 | [0.695–1.950] |
| W. vs All trypanosomes | 0.572 | 0.858 | [0.503–1.462] |
| Symbionts (S. + W.) vs All trypanosomes | 0.942 | 1.022 | [0.561–1.863] |
S. S. glossinidius, W. Wolbachia sp., vs versus, Tb sl. T. brucei s.l., TcF T. congolense forest type, TcS T. congolense savannah type