Literature DB >> 30465061

Validation of the Amharic version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS).

Tadesse Belayneh1, Abebaw Gebeyehu2, Mulat Adefris3, Guri Rortveit4,5, Tinsae Genet3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) into Amharic and evaluate its psychometric properties.
METHODS: We followed an intercultural adaptation procedure to translate and adapt the POP-SS. One hundred and eighty-six women with POP symptoms completed the Amharic POP-SS and Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaires. All women were examined using a simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (SPOP-Q) system and were divided into four groups based on the POP-Q scores as stage 1, 2, 3, and 4. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined using Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Criterion validity was assessed against the SPOP-Q stage and the P-QoL scale. Furthermore, we tested construct validity using exploratory factor analysis.
RESULTS: The POP-SS score was successfully translated and achieved good content validity. It had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.81; p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference among four groups of stages in POP-SS score. and women with stage 3 had the highest median score (Kruskal-Wallis test; p < 0.05). The POP-SS score was also significantly correlated with the P-QoL score (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.28, p < 0.001). The exploratory factor analysis identified two factors, namely, physical symptoms and evacuation symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The POP-SS scale was successfully translated to Amharic and appears reliable and valid for women with symptoms of POP. However, further studies are needed to evaluate its responsiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amharic validation; Ethiopian; Pelvic organ prolapse; Reliability; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30465061     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3825-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  25 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Statistics Notes: Validating scales and indexes.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

3.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 5.  Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials.

Authors:  Catherine Acquadro; Katrin Conway; Asha Hareendran; Neil Aaronson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse.

Authors:  G Alessandro Digesu; Vik Khullar; Linda Cardozo; Dudley Robinson; Stefano Salvatore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-10-21

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations.

Authors:  Linn Gjersing; John R M Caplehorn; Thomas Clausen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures.

Authors:  Hugh Hurst; Jennifer Bolton
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score.

Authors:  S Hagen; C Glazener; L Sinclair; D Stark; C Bugge
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort.

Authors:  Guri Rortveit; Jeanette S Brown; David H Thom; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Jennifer M Creasman; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and health-related quality of life: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Tadesse Belayneh; Abebaw Gebeyehu; Mulat Adefris; Guri Rortveit; Janne Lillelid Gjerde; Tadesse Awoke Ayele
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Translating the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Score into Samoan using a modified back translation methodology.

Authors:  Melanie Dembinsky; Ramona Boodoosingh; Saunima'a Ma Fulu-Aiolupotea; Uila Laifa Lima; Alec Ekeroma; Carol Bugge; Suzanne Hagen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.