Literature DB >> 18947342

Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score.

S Hagen1, C Glazener, L Sinclair, D Stark, C Bugge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the internal consistency, construct validity and sensitivity to change of a pelvic organ prolapse symptom score (POP-SS).
DESIGN: Analysis of data from three prolapse studies, including symptomatic and asymptomatic women who completed the POP-SS.
SETTING: (1) A community setting in New Zealand, (2) two gynaecology outpatient departments in Scotland and (3) a gynaecological surgery department in Scotland. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: (1) Participants from a survey of postnatal women at 12-year follow up, invited to complete a prolapse questionnaire and have prolapse assessment, (2) new gynaecology outpatients presenting with prolapse symptoms, randomised to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) or control and (3) women having anterior and/or posterior prolapse surgery, randomised to mesh insert or no mesh.
METHOD: Data were analysed to assess internal consistency, construct validity and sensitivity to change of the POP-SS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cronbach's alpha, significance of differences in POP-SS scores between studies and significance of difference in POP-SS scores pre- to post-intervention.
RESULTS: For internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.723 to 0.828. Women having surgery had higher POP-SS scores than those having conservative management (mean difference 5.0, 95% CI 3.1-6.9), who in turn had higher scores than the asymptomatic women (mean difference 5.9, 95% CI 4.4-7.4). Significant differences in POP-SS score were detected after surgery and PFMT. The improvement due to surgery was significantly greater than that associated with PFMT (z =-3.006, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: The POP-SS has good internal consistency and construct validity and is sensitive to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18947342     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01903.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  21 in total

1.  Validation of the Amharic version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS).

Authors:  Tadesse Belayneh; Abebaw Gebeyehu; Mulat Adefris; Guri Rortveit; Tinsae Genet
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.

Authors:  Christine Hemming; Lynda Constable; Beatriz Goulao; Mary Kilonzo; Dwayne Boyers; Andrew Elders; Kevin Cooper; Anthony Smith; Robert Freeman; Suzanne Breeman; Alison McDonald; Suzanne Hagen; Isobel Montgomery; John Norrie; Cathryn Glazener
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Elisabeth J Adams; Deepa Gopinath; Fiona Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

4.  Turkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliability.

Authors:  Nuriye Özengin; Serap Kaya; Ceren Orhan; Yeşim Bakar; Bülent Duran; Handan Ankaralı; Türkan Akbayrak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for women with urinary incontinence: the OPAL RCT.

Authors:  Suzanne Hagen; Carol Bugge; Sarah G Dean; Andrew Elders; Jean Hay-Smith; Mary Kilonzo; Doreen McClurg; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Wael Agur; Federico Andreis; Joanne Booth; Maria Dimitrova; Nicola Gillespie; Cathryn Glazener; Aileen Grant; Karen L Guerrero; Lorna Henderson; Marija Kovandzic; Alison McDonald; John Norrie; Nicole Sergenson; Susan Stratton; Anne Taylor; Louise R Williams
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  International Urogynaecology Consultation chapter 1 committee 4: patients' perception of disease burden of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Dudley Robinson; Lisa T Prodigalidad; Symphorosa Chan; Maurizio Serati; Svjetlana Lozo; Jerry Lowder; Chiara Ghetti; Kathie Hullfish; Suzanne Hagen; Chantal Dumoulin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sara Cichowski; Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Gabriela E Halder; Sierra Jansen; Daniela Gold; Montserrat Espuña; Swati Jha; Ahmed Al-Badr; Abdelmageed Abdelrahman; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 8.  The effect of pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Zhengfang Wen; Meng Li
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 1.932

9.  How common are complications following polypropylene mesh, biological xenograft and native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse? A secondary analysis from the PROSPECT trial.

Authors:  F M Reid; A Elders; S Breeman; R M Freeman
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 7.331

10.  Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Elisabeth J Adams; Deepa Gopinath; Fiona Stewart; Melanie Dembinsky; Pauline Sobiesuo; Rohna Kearney
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.