| Literature DB >> 30463617 |
Shuhao Sun1, Fima Klebaner1, Xinan Zhang2, Tianhai Tian3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer is one of the leading causes for the morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although substantial studies have been conducted theoretically and experimentally in recent years, it is still a challenge to explore the mechanisms of cancer initiation and progression. The investigation for these problems is very important for the diagnosis of cancer diseases and development of treatment schemes.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; Cancer cell doubling time; Initial mutation rate; Mathematical model
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30463617 PMCID: PMC6249718 DOI: 10.1186/s12918-018-0629-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Fig. 1Numerical simulations of model (4) using the constant mutation rate and non-constant mutation rate. a proportions of cells with two mutations. b proportions of cells with eight mutations. (Solid line: model using constant mutation rate; dash-red line: model using non-constant mutation rate)
Estimated average mutation rate, initial mutation rate and the value of parameter b based on the clinic data of seven patients from [18] (Survival from diagnosis: month)
| Patients | Survival from diagnosis | Clone time diagnosis | Mutations | Mutation rate | Initial rate | b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pa01C | 6 | 9.8 | 49 | 0.0192 | 0.01917 | 0.00001 |
| Pa02C | 8 | 9.4 | 35 | 0.019 | 0.0189 | 0.000018 |
| Pa03C | 1 | 2.4 | 28 | 0.0223 | 0.0201 | 0.000030 |
| Pa04C | 7 | 7.9 | 34 | 0.0188 | 0.0185 | 0.000019 |
| Pa05C | 10 | 4.3 | 28 | 0.0194 | 0.0189 | 0.000029 |
| Pa07C | 3 | 3.1 | 50 | 0.0198 | 0.0198 | 0.00001 |
| Pa08C | 15 | 10.6 | 35 | 0.0193 | 0.0190 | 0.000018 |
Fig. 2Negative correlations between the patient suvivour time and gene mutation rate (Circle: initial mutation rate, blue under line: predicted initial mutation rate; star: average mutation rate, red above line: predicted average gene mutation rate)
Fig. 3The number of cell doubling over time. a The Amikura-Yachita curve using piece-wise doubling time (solid-line) and our proposed average nonlinear model (15) (dot-line). b The doubling time curve for seven patients using the proposed nonlinear model (14)
Estimated tumour size for seven patients. Tumour-size (L) (M) (H) is based on the lower bound, average time and higher bound of the clone time
| Patients | Pa01c | Pa02c | Pa03c | Pa04c | Pa05x | Pa07c | Pa08c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clone time(y) | 4.05-5.94 | 3.3-4.84 | 3.9-5.72 | 3.45-5.06 | 3.3-4.8 | 3.7-5.4 | 3.1-4.6 |
| Tumor-size(L) | 4.55 | 4.12 | 9.08 | 3.52 | 4.63 | 5.95 | 4.20 |
| Tumor-size(M) | 4.73 | 4.46 | 10.15 | 3.80 | 5.15 | 6.25 | 4.58 |
| Tumor-size(H) | 4.82 | 4.71 | 11.09 | 4.01 | 5.59 | 6.42 | 4.86 |
| Time for 2cm | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.325 | 0.275 | 0.19 | 0.29 |
Time for 2cm is the scaled time (based on the average time) for tumour to teach 2cm