Literature DB >> 16394050

Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester.

Eleanor A Drey1, Diana G Foster, Rebecca A Jackson, Susan J Lee, Lilia H Cardenas, Philip D Darney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with delay of induced abortion into the second trimester of pregnancy.
METHODS: Using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing, 398 women from 5 to 23 weeks of gestation at an urban hospital described steps and reasons that could have led to a delayed abortion. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent contributors to delay.
RESULTS: Half of the 70-day difference between the average gestational durations in first- and second-trimester abortions is due to later suspicion of pregnancy and administration of a pregnancy test. Delays in suspecting and testing for pregnancy cumulatively caused 58% of second-trimester patients to miss the opportunity to have a first-trimester abortion. Women presenting in the second trimester experienced more delaying factors (3.2 versus 2.0, P < .001), with logistical delays occurring more frequently for these women (63.3% versus 30.4%, P < .001). Factors associated with second-trimester abortion in logistic regression were prior second-trimester abortion, delay in obtaining state insurance, difficulty locating a provider, initial referral elsewhere, and uncertainty about last menstrual period. Factors associated with decreased likelihood of second-trimester abortion were presence of nausea or vomiting, prior abortion, and contraception use.
CONCLUSION: Abortion delay results from myriad factors, many of them logistical, such as inappropriate or delayed referrals and delays in obtaining public insurance. Public health interventions could promote earlier recognition of pregnancy, more timely referrals, more easily obtainable public funding, and improved abortion access for indigent women. However, accessible second-trimester abortion services will remain necessary for the women who present late due to delayed recognition of and testing for pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16394050     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000189095.32382.d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  51 in total

1.  Late pregnancy abortions: an analysis of Québec stillbirth data, 1981-2006.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Geoffroy Denis
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Quality of Information Available Online for Abortion Self-Referral.

Authors:  Laura E Dodge; Sharon J Phillips; Dayna T Neo; Siripanth Nippita; Maureen E Paul; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Jill Shah; Michele G Mandel; Jamie W Krashin; Danielle B Suchdev; Denise J Jamieson; Karen Pazol
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-11-23

4.  Implications of Georgia's 20-Week Abortion Ban.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Heather Gould; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver.

Authors:  Tracy A Weitz; Diana Taylor; Sheila Desai; Ushma D Upadhyay; Jeff Waldman; Molly F Battistelli; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The provision of comprehensive reproductive health services in Los Angeles: a physician's perspective.

Authors:  Melissa F Natavio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Abortion Stigma Among Low-Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment.

Authors:  Amanda Gelman; Elian A Rosenfeld; Cara Nikolajski; Lori R Freedman; Julia R Steinberg; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-12-16

8.  Bringing evidence to the debate on abortion coverage in health reform legislation: findings from a national survey in the United States.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Daniel Grossman; Tracy A Weitz; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa.

Authors:  Daniel A Grossman; Kate Grindlay; Todd Buchacker; Joseph E Potter; Carl P Schmertmann
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Dilation and evacuation training in maternal-fetal medicine fellowships.

Authors:  Melissa G Rosenstein; Jema K Turk; Aaron B Caughey; Jody E Steinauer; Jennifer L Kerns
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.